Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Risk and Organizational Networks: Making Sense ...
View graph of relations

Risk and Organizational Networks: Making Sense of Failure in the Division of Labour

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Risk and Organizational Networks: Making Sense of Failure in the Division of Labour. / Busby, Jeremy; Alcock, R. E.

In: Risk Management, Vol. 10, No. 4, 10.2008, p. 235-256.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Busby J, Alcock RE. Risk and Organizational Networks: Making Sense of Failure in the Division of Labour. Risk Management. 2008 Oct;10(4):235-256. doi: 10.1057/rm.2008.10

Author

Busby, Jeremy ; Alcock, R. E. / Risk and Organizational Networks: Making Sense of Failure in the Division of Labour. In: Risk Management. 2008 ; Vol. 10, No. 4. pp. 235-256.

Bibtex

@article{3741c53510d34db3b754596a5e7d46bb,
title = "Risk and Organizational Networks: Making Sense of Failure in the Division of Labour",
abstract = "Recent crises have implicated organizational networks, rather than individual, unitary organizations, suggesting that the network rather than the single organization is the appropriate unit of analysis for understanding risk. It is the division of labour across organizational boundaries that appear to be especially threatening. This study investigated how sense is made of the risk that arises from this division of labour, analysing journalistic commentary on two iconic cases in the UK: the Hatfield derailment and the Sudan 1 food contamination scandal. In both cases it was the nature of networks that was central to most explanations of the events that took place, and in both cases it was the societal perception of risk that was more consequential than the objective physical harm. The main conclusion from the analysis was that this sensemaking was ambivalent about organizational networks – seeing advantages as well as drawbacks, and indicating that the main problem was not the choice of how to divide labour but to ensure that the chosen division was rigorously developed and maintained.",
keywords = "risk, organizations, networks, division of labour",
author = "Jeremy Busby and Alcock, {R. E.}",
year = "2008",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1057/rm.2008.10",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "235--256",
journal = "Risk Management",
issn = "1460-3799",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk and Organizational Networks: Making Sense of Failure in the Division of Labour

AU - Busby, Jeremy

AU - Alcock, R. E.

PY - 2008/10

Y1 - 2008/10

N2 - Recent crises have implicated organizational networks, rather than individual, unitary organizations, suggesting that the network rather than the single organization is the appropriate unit of analysis for understanding risk. It is the division of labour across organizational boundaries that appear to be especially threatening. This study investigated how sense is made of the risk that arises from this division of labour, analysing journalistic commentary on two iconic cases in the UK: the Hatfield derailment and the Sudan 1 food contamination scandal. In both cases it was the nature of networks that was central to most explanations of the events that took place, and in both cases it was the societal perception of risk that was more consequential than the objective physical harm. The main conclusion from the analysis was that this sensemaking was ambivalent about organizational networks – seeing advantages as well as drawbacks, and indicating that the main problem was not the choice of how to divide labour but to ensure that the chosen division was rigorously developed and maintained.

AB - Recent crises have implicated organizational networks, rather than individual, unitary organizations, suggesting that the network rather than the single organization is the appropriate unit of analysis for understanding risk. It is the division of labour across organizational boundaries that appear to be especially threatening. This study investigated how sense is made of the risk that arises from this division of labour, analysing journalistic commentary on two iconic cases in the UK: the Hatfield derailment and the Sudan 1 food contamination scandal. In both cases it was the nature of networks that was central to most explanations of the events that took place, and in both cases it was the societal perception of risk that was more consequential than the objective physical harm. The main conclusion from the analysis was that this sensemaking was ambivalent about organizational networks – seeing advantages as well as drawbacks, and indicating that the main problem was not the choice of how to divide labour but to ensure that the chosen division was rigorously developed and maintained.

KW - risk

KW - organizations

KW - networks

KW - division of labour

U2 - 10.1057/rm.2008.10

DO - 10.1057/rm.2008.10

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 235

EP - 256

JO - Risk Management

JF - Risk Management

SN - 1460-3799

IS - 4

ER -