Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Costa‐Gomes, M. A., Ju, Y. and Li, J. (2018), ROLE‐REVERSAL CONSISTENCY: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE GOLDEN RULE. Econ Inq. . doi:10.1111/ecin.12708 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecin.12708 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
Accepted author manuscript, 472 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Role-Reversal Consistency
T2 - An Experimental Study of the Golden Rule
AU - Costa-Gomes, Miguel A.
AU - Ju, Yuan
AU - Li, Jiawen
N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Costa‐Gomes, M. A., Ju, Y. and Li, J. (2018), ROLE‐REVERSAL CONSISTENCY: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE GOLDEN RULE. Econ Inq. . doi:10.1111/ecin.12708 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecin.12708 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - We report an experiment that asks whether people in a strategic situation behave according to the Golden Rule, that is, do not treat others in ways that they find disagreeable to themselves, a property that we call role‐reversal consistency. Overall, we find that over three quarters of the subjects are role‐reversal consistent. Regression analysis suggests that this finding is not driven by players maximizing their subjective expected monetary earnings given their stated beliefs about their opponents' behavior. We find that subjects' stated beliefs and actions reveal mild projection bias. (JEL C78, C91)
AB - We report an experiment that asks whether people in a strategic situation behave according to the Golden Rule, that is, do not treat others in ways that they find disagreeable to themselves, a property that we call role‐reversal consistency. Overall, we find that over three quarters of the subjects are role‐reversal consistent. Regression analysis suggests that this finding is not driven by players maximizing their subjective expected monetary earnings given their stated beliefs about their opponents' behavior. We find that subjects' stated beliefs and actions reveal mild projection bias. (JEL C78, C91)
U2 - 10.1111/ecin.12708
DO - 10.1111/ecin.12708
M3 - Journal article
VL - 57
SP - 685
EP - 704
JO - Economic Inquiry
JF - Economic Inquiry
SN - 0095-2583
IS - 1
ER -