Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Rural and urban poaching in Victorian England.

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Rural and urban poaching in Victorian England.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Rural and urban poaching in Victorian England. / Winstanley, M. J.; Osborne, H.
In: Rural History, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.10.2006, p. 187-212.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Winstanley, MJ & Osborne, H 2006, 'Rural and urban poaching in Victorian England.', Rural History, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 187-212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956793306001877

APA

Vancouver

Winstanley MJ, Osborne H. Rural and urban poaching in Victorian England. Rural History. 2006 Oct 1;17(2):187-212. doi: 10.1017/S0956793306001877

Author

Winstanley, M. J. ; Osborne, H. / Rural and urban poaching in Victorian England. In: Rural History. 2006 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 187-212.

Bibtex

@article{b8389f0a7e50497c97b88d286702f0af,
title = "Rural and urban poaching in Victorian England.",
abstract = "Poaching is commonly portrayed as the archetypal nineteenth-century {\textquoteleft}rural{\textquoteright} crime, particularly associated with agricultural districts of southern and eastern England. This study argues that this interpretation is misleading. Judicial statistics collected from the mid-nineteenth century suggest that poaching was much more widespread in the North and Midlands than has previously been acknowledged. These industrialising regions largely determined the national trends in poaching in the second half of the century which have usually been considered to be characteristics of rural society in the South. The South shared neither the national peak in prosecutions of the mid-1870s nor the dramatic decline in prosecutions thereafter. It considers a range of possible explanations for these different regional trends. These include a discussion of the potential motivation of so-called {\textquoteleft}steam age poachers{\textquoteright} but also the growing regional specialisation in game preservation during the period and the different opportunities, and obstacles, this presented for poaching.",
author = "Winstanley, {M. J.} and H. Osborne",
note = "The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Rural History, 17 (2), pp 187-212 2006, {\textcopyright} 2006 Cambridge University Press. This is a genuinely joint article arising out of shared postgraduate teaching and research interests while Dr Osborne was at Lancaster. Data collection was equally shared and the analysis and format of the article jointly written. Two presentations on the subject were made by the authors to the Agricultural History Conference (2001) and Field Sports conference (2005). RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : History",
year = "2006",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0956793306001877",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "187--212",
journal = "Rural History",
issn = "0956-7933",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rural and urban poaching in Victorian England.

AU - Winstanley, M. J.

AU - Osborne, H.

N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Rural History, 17 (2), pp 187-212 2006, © 2006 Cambridge University Press. This is a genuinely joint article arising out of shared postgraduate teaching and research interests while Dr Osborne was at Lancaster. Data collection was equally shared and the analysis and format of the article jointly written. Two presentations on the subject were made by the authors to the Agricultural History Conference (2001) and Field Sports conference (2005). RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : History

PY - 2006/10/1

Y1 - 2006/10/1

N2 - Poaching is commonly portrayed as the archetypal nineteenth-century ‘rural’ crime, particularly associated with agricultural districts of southern and eastern England. This study argues that this interpretation is misleading. Judicial statistics collected from the mid-nineteenth century suggest that poaching was much more widespread in the North and Midlands than has previously been acknowledged. These industrialising regions largely determined the national trends in poaching in the second half of the century which have usually been considered to be characteristics of rural society in the South. The South shared neither the national peak in prosecutions of the mid-1870s nor the dramatic decline in prosecutions thereafter. It considers a range of possible explanations for these different regional trends. These include a discussion of the potential motivation of so-called ‘steam age poachers’ but also the growing regional specialisation in game preservation during the period and the different opportunities, and obstacles, this presented for poaching.

AB - Poaching is commonly portrayed as the archetypal nineteenth-century ‘rural’ crime, particularly associated with agricultural districts of southern and eastern England. This study argues that this interpretation is misleading. Judicial statistics collected from the mid-nineteenth century suggest that poaching was much more widespread in the North and Midlands than has previously been acknowledged. These industrialising regions largely determined the national trends in poaching in the second half of the century which have usually been considered to be characteristics of rural society in the South. The South shared neither the national peak in prosecutions of the mid-1870s nor the dramatic decline in prosecutions thereafter. It considers a range of possible explanations for these different regional trends. These include a discussion of the potential motivation of so-called ‘steam age poachers’ but also the growing regional specialisation in game preservation during the period and the different opportunities, and obstacles, this presented for poaching.

U2 - 10.1017/S0956793306001877

DO - 10.1017/S0956793306001877

M3 - Journal article

VL - 17

SP - 187

EP - 212

JO - Rural History

JF - Rural History

SN - 0956-7933

IS - 2

ER -