Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Sabbatical leave

Research

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Sabbatical leave: who gains and how much?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Sabbatical leave: who gains and how much? / Davidson, Oranit B.; Eden, Dov; Westman, Mina et al.
In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 95, No. 5, 09.2010, p. 953-964.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Davidson, OB, Eden, D, Westman, M, Cohen-charash, Y, Hammer, LB, Kluger, AN, Krausz, M, Maslach, C, O'Driscoll, M, Perrewé, PL, Quick, JC, Rosenblatt, Z & Spector, PE 2010, 'Sabbatical leave: who gains and how much?', Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 953-964. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020068

APA

Davidson, O. B., Eden, D., Westman, M., Cohen-charash, Y., Hammer, L. B., Kluger, A. N., Krausz, M., Maslach, C., O'Driscoll, M., Perrewé, P. L., Quick, J. C., Rosenblatt, Z., & Spector, P. E. (2010). Sabbatical leave: who gains and how much? Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 953-964. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020068

Vancouver

Davidson OB, Eden D, Westman M, Cohen-charash Y, Hammer LB, Kluger AN et al. Sabbatical leave: who gains and how much? Journal of Applied Psychology. 2010 Sept;95(5):953-964. doi: 10.1037/a0020068

Author

Davidson, Oranit B. ; Eden, Dov ; Westman, Mina et al. / Sabbatical leave : who gains and how much?. In: Journal of Applied Psychology. 2010 ; Vol. 95, No. 5. pp. 953-964.

Bibtex

@article{d6d573c4e6644a2997c2cd965362975f,
title = "Sabbatical leave: who gains and how much?",
abstract = "A rigorous quasi-experiment tested the ameliorative effects of a sabbatical leave, a special case of respite from routine work. We hypothesized that (a) respite increases resource level and well-being and (b) individual differences and respite features moderate respite effects. A sample of 129 faculty members on sabbatical and 129 matched controls completed measures of resource gain, resource loss, and well-being before, during, and after the sabbatical. Among the sabbatees, resource loss declined and resource gain and well-being rose during the sabbatical. The comparison group showed no change. Moderation analysis revealed that those who reported higher respite self-efficacy and greater control, were more detached, had a more positive sabbatical experience, and spent their sabbatical outside their home country enjoyed more enhanced well-being than others.",
author = "Davidson, {Oranit B.} and Dov Eden and Mina Westman and Yochi Cohen-charash and Hammer, {Leslie B.} and Kluger, {Avraham N.} and Moshe Krausz and Christina Maslach and Michael O'Driscoll and Perrew{\'e}, {Pamela L.} and Quick, {James Campbell} and Zehava Rosenblatt and Spector, {Paul E.}",
year = "2010",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1037/a0020068",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "953--964",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sabbatical leave

T2 - who gains and how much?

AU - Davidson, Oranit B.

AU - Eden, Dov

AU - Westman, Mina

AU - Cohen-charash, Yochi

AU - Hammer, Leslie B.

AU - Kluger, Avraham N.

AU - Krausz, Moshe

AU - Maslach, Christina

AU - O'Driscoll, Michael

AU - Perrewé, Pamela L.

AU - Quick, James Campbell

AU - Rosenblatt, Zehava

AU - Spector, Paul E.

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - A rigorous quasi-experiment tested the ameliorative effects of a sabbatical leave, a special case of respite from routine work. We hypothesized that (a) respite increases resource level and well-being and (b) individual differences and respite features moderate respite effects. A sample of 129 faculty members on sabbatical and 129 matched controls completed measures of resource gain, resource loss, and well-being before, during, and after the sabbatical. Among the sabbatees, resource loss declined and resource gain and well-being rose during the sabbatical. The comparison group showed no change. Moderation analysis revealed that those who reported higher respite self-efficacy and greater control, were more detached, had a more positive sabbatical experience, and spent their sabbatical outside their home country enjoyed more enhanced well-being than others.

AB - A rigorous quasi-experiment tested the ameliorative effects of a sabbatical leave, a special case of respite from routine work. We hypothesized that (a) respite increases resource level and well-being and (b) individual differences and respite features moderate respite effects. A sample of 129 faculty members on sabbatical and 129 matched controls completed measures of resource gain, resource loss, and well-being before, during, and after the sabbatical. Among the sabbatees, resource loss declined and resource gain and well-being rose during the sabbatical. The comparison group showed no change. Moderation analysis revealed that those who reported higher respite self-efficacy and greater control, were more detached, had a more positive sabbatical experience, and spent their sabbatical outside their home country enjoyed more enhanced well-being than others.

U2 - 10.1037/a0020068

DO - 10.1037/a0020068

M3 - Journal article

VL - 95

SP - 953

EP - 964

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 5

ER -