Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Scaling up research on family justice using lar...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Scaling up research on family justice using large-scale administrative data: an invitation to the socio-legal community

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Scaling up research on family justice using large-scale administrative data: an invitation to the socio-legal community. / Broadhurst, K.; Cusworth, L.; Harwin, J. et al.
In: Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Vol. 43, No. 3, 18.08.2021, p. 237-255.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Broadhurst K, Cusworth L, Harwin J, Alrouh B, Bedston S, Trinder L et al. Scaling up research on family justice using large-scale administrative data: an invitation to the socio-legal community. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2021 Aug 18;43(3):237-255. Epub 2021 Jul 30. doi: 10.1080/09649069.2021.1953856

Author

Bibtex

@article{2116f95edc2c4edc87a9ec8d0deeb5f6,
title = "Scaling up research on family justice using large-scale administrative data: an invitation to the socio-legal community",
abstract = "This article outlines the value of administrative data for family justice research. Although socio-legal scholars have extended their research beyond purely theoretical or doctrinal analyses, studies using large-scale digital datasets remain few in number. As new opportunities arise to link large-scale administrative datasets across health, education, welfare and justice, it is vital that the community of family justice researchers and analysts are supported to deliver research based on entire service or family court populations. In this context, this article provides a definition of administrative data, before outlining the potential of single, linked or blended administrative data sets for family justice research. The remaining sections of the article speak to questions that are pertinent to this particular academic community, including the distinctive contribution of the socio-legal scholar to interdisciplinary teams and the place of data providers in collaborative research. Drawing on the sociological concept of {\textquoteleft}publics{\textquoteright}, the final section considers the multiple interest groups whose social licence must be secured, when personal records are used to understand the relationship between law and family life. ",
keywords = "Administrative data, digital records, justice, socio-legal, theory",
author = "K. Broadhurst and L. Cusworth and J. Harwin and B. Alrouh and S. Bedston and L. Trinder and K. Jones and D. Ford and L. Griffiths",
year = "2021",
month = aug,
day = "18",
doi = "10.1080/09649069.2021.1953856",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "237--255",
journal = "Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law",
issn = "0964-9069",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scaling up research on family justice using large-scale administrative data

T2 - an invitation to the socio-legal community

AU - Broadhurst, K.

AU - Cusworth, L.

AU - Harwin, J.

AU - Alrouh, B.

AU - Bedston, S.

AU - Trinder, L.

AU - Jones, K.

AU - Ford, D.

AU - Griffiths, L.

PY - 2021/8/18

Y1 - 2021/8/18

N2 - This article outlines the value of administrative data for family justice research. Although socio-legal scholars have extended their research beyond purely theoretical or doctrinal analyses, studies using large-scale digital datasets remain few in number. As new opportunities arise to link large-scale administrative datasets across health, education, welfare and justice, it is vital that the community of family justice researchers and analysts are supported to deliver research based on entire service or family court populations. In this context, this article provides a definition of administrative data, before outlining the potential of single, linked or blended administrative data sets for family justice research. The remaining sections of the article speak to questions that are pertinent to this particular academic community, including the distinctive contribution of the socio-legal scholar to interdisciplinary teams and the place of data providers in collaborative research. Drawing on the sociological concept of ‘publics’, the final section considers the multiple interest groups whose social licence must be secured, when personal records are used to understand the relationship between law and family life. 

AB - This article outlines the value of administrative data for family justice research. Although socio-legal scholars have extended their research beyond purely theoretical or doctrinal analyses, studies using large-scale digital datasets remain few in number. As new opportunities arise to link large-scale administrative datasets across health, education, welfare and justice, it is vital that the community of family justice researchers and analysts are supported to deliver research based on entire service or family court populations. In this context, this article provides a definition of administrative data, before outlining the potential of single, linked or blended administrative data sets for family justice research. The remaining sections of the article speak to questions that are pertinent to this particular academic community, including the distinctive contribution of the socio-legal scholar to interdisciplinary teams and the place of data providers in collaborative research. Drawing on the sociological concept of ‘publics’, the final section considers the multiple interest groups whose social licence must be secured, when personal records are used to understand the relationship between law and family life. 

KW - Administrative data

KW - digital records

KW - justice

KW - socio-legal

KW - theory

U2 - 10.1080/09649069.2021.1953856

DO - 10.1080/09649069.2021.1953856

M3 - Journal article

VL - 43

SP - 237

EP - 255

JO - Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

JF - Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

SN - 0964-9069

IS - 3

ER -