Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Science for whom?
View graph of relations

Science for whom?: Agricultural Development and the Theory of Induced Innovation

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Science for whom? Agricultural Development and the Theory of Induced Innovation. / Palladino, Paolo.

In: Agriculture and Human Values, Vol. 4, No. 2-3, 03.1987, p. 53-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Palladino, Paolo. / Science for whom? Agricultural Development and the Theory of Induced Innovation. In: Agriculture and Human Values. 1987 ; Vol. 4, No. 2-3. pp. 53-64.

Bibtex

@article{6350b60bab7a4a32b05e6399a03fcfc1,
title = "Science for whom?: Agricultural Development and the Theory of Induced Innovation",
abstract = "Marxist social scientists have argued that the relationship between social and technical change is one of mutual interaction; innovation in the modes of production affects social organization, and social organization, in turn, has an impact on the development of novel modes of production. This consideration is of fundamental importance for the construction of any economic development policy. However, analyses of this critical relationship have been elaborated within a conceptual framework which most social scientists and policy makers who work within the framework of neoclassical economic thought find difficult to understand. When marxists argue that technical innovations are the product of a class conflict, non-marxist social scientists are left wondering about what the exact meaning of such a statement. Because marxists have been unable to communicate their message, their important insights into the relation between social and technical change have not been incorporated in contemporary development policy; this situation has often resulted in great social costs. In the past fifteen years, however, Yujiro Hayami and Vernon Ruttan have attempted to analyze the critical interaction of social and technical change using neo-classical economic concepts. I argue that their approach can be utilized to express marxist insights in a language accessible to non-marxist social scientists. The careful and critical adoption of this approach could provide the grounds for a more fruitful dialogue about the interaction of social and technical change, and aid the construction of a new development policy.",
author = "Paolo Palladino",
year = "1987",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1007/BF01530642",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "53--64",
journal = "Agriculture and Human Values",
issn = "0889-048X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2-3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Science for whom?

T2 - Agricultural Development and the Theory of Induced Innovation

AU - Palladino, Paolo

PY - 1987/3

Y1 - 1987/3

N2 - Marxist social scientists have argued that the relationship between social and technical change is one of mutual interaction; innovation in the modes of production affects social organization, and social organization, in turn, has an impact on the development of novel modes of production. This consideration is of fundamental importance for the construction of any economic development policy. However, analyses of this critical relationship have been elaborated within a conceptual framework which most social scientists and policy makers who work within the framework of neoclassical economic thought find difficult to understand. When marxists argue that technical innovations are the product of a class conflict, non-marxist social scientists are left wondering about what the exact meaning of such a statement. Because marxists have been unable to communicate their message, their important insights into the relation between social and technical change have not been incorporated in contemporary development policy; this situation has often resulted in great social costs. In the past fifteen years, however, Yujiro Hayami and Vernon Ruttan have attempted to analyze the critical interaction of social and technical change using neo-classical economic concepts. I argue that their approach can be utilized to express marxist insights in a language accessible to non-marxist social scientists. The careful and critical adoption of this approach could provide the grounds for a more fruitful dialogue about the interaction of social and technical change, and aid the construction of a new development policy.

AB - Marxist social scientists have argued that the relationship between social and technical change is one of mutual interaction; innovation in the modes of production affects social organization, and social organization, in turn, has an impact on the development of novel modes of production. This consideration is of fundamental importance for the construction of any economic development policy. However, analyses of this critical relationship have been elaborated within a conceptual framework which most social scientists and policy makers who work within the framework of neoclassical economic thought find difficult to understand. When marxists argue that technical innovations are the product of a class conflict, non-marxist social scientists are left wondering about what the exact meaning of such a statement. Because marxists have been unable to communicate their message, their important insights into the relation between social and technical change have not been incorporated in contemporary development policy; this situation has often resulted in great social costs. In the past fifteen years, however, Yujiro Hayami and Vernon Ruttan have attempted to analyze the critical interaction of social and technical change using neo-classical economic concepts. I argue that their approach can be utilized to express marxist insights in a language accessible to non-marxist social scientists. The careful and critical adoption of this approach could provide the grounds for a more fruitful dialogue about the interaction of social and technical change, and aid the construction of a new development policy.

U2 - 10.1007/BF01530642

DO - 10.1007/BF01530642

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

SP - 53

EP - 64

JO - Agriculture and Human Values

JF - Agriculture and Human Values

SN - 0889-048X

IS - 2-3

ER -