Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Scientific Opinion on the report of the FOCUS g...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Scientific Opinion on the report of the FOCUS groundwater working group (FOCUS, 2009): assessment of lower tiers

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Scientific Opinion on the report of the FOCUS groundwater working group (FOCUS, 2009): assessment of lower tiers. / EFSA PPR Panel.
In: EFSA Journal, Vol. 11, No. 2, 3114, 27.02.2013.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

EFSA PPR Panel. Scientific Opinion on the report of the FOCUS groundwater working group (FOCUS, 2009): assessment of lower tiers. EFSA Journal. 2013 Feb 27;11(2):3114. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3114

Author

Bibtex

@article{38033ee32de04cb8ac87889368edec8b,
title = "Scientific Opinion on the report of the FOCUS groundwater working group (FOCUS, 2009): assessment of lower tiers",
abstract = "Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the report of the FOCUS groundwater working group (FOCUS, 2009) with respect to lower tier leaching assessments. The PPR Panel is of the general opinion that the FOCUS groundwater working group has successfully harmonised major concepts in the leaching models and that, overall, the leaching estimations have improved. Despite several limitations, the PPR Panel considers that the revised FOCUS scenarios cover significant arable areas in the EU, including the New Member States, and allow for decision making at the EU level. The PPR Panel however has observed that flaws in underlying data have become apparent after finalising the report. Also new approaches on scenario selection have become available. The PPR Panel recommends that these flaws and new approaches are taken into account when developing revised scenarios.",
author = "Ockleford, {Colin Douglas} and {EFSA PPR Panel}",
year = "2013",
month = feb,
day = "27",
doi = "10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3114",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "EFSA Journal",
issn = "1831-4732",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scientific Opinion on the report of the FOCUS groundwater working group (FOCUS, 2009)

T2 - assessment of lower tiers

AU - Ockleford, Colin Douglas

AU - EFSA PPR Panel

PY - 2013/2/27

Y1 - 2013/2/27

N2 - Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the report of the FOCUS groundwater working group (FOCUS, 2009) with respect to lower tier leaching assessments. The PPR Panel is of the general opinion that the FOCUS groundwater working group has successfully harmonised major concepts in the leaching models and that, overall, the leaching estimations have improved. Despite several limitations, the PPR Panel considers that the revised FOCUS scenarios cover significant arable areas in the EU, including the New Member States, and allow for decision making at the EU level. The PPR Panel however has observed that flaws in underlying data have become apparent after finalising the report. Also new approaches on scenario selection have become available. The PPR Panel recommends that these flaws and new approaches are taken into account when developing revised scenarios.

AB - Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the report of the FOCUS groundwater working group (FOCUS, 2009) with respect to lower tier leaching assessments. The PPR Panel is of the general opinion that the FOCUS groundwater working group has successfully harmonised major concepts in the leaching models and that, overall, the leaching estimations have improved. Despite several limitations, the PPR Panel considers that the revised FOCUS scenarios cover significant arable areas in the EU, including the New Member States, and allow for decision making at the EU level. The PPR Panel however has observed that flaws in underlying data have become apparent after finalising the report. Also new approaches on scenario selection have become available. The PPR Panel recommends that these flaws and new approaches are taken into account when developing revised scenarios.

U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3114

DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3114

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

JO - EFSA Journal

JF - EFSA Journal

SN - 1831-4732

IS - 2

M1 - 3114

ER -