Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 18,3, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2018.10.006
Accepted author manuscript, 740 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Seasonal fluctuation of lung function in cystic fibrosis
T2 - A national register-based study in two northern European populations
AU - Qvist, Tavs
AU - Schlüter, Daniela K
AU - Rajabzadeh, Vian
AU - Diggle, Peter John
AU - Pressler, Tania
AU - Carr, Siobhan B
AU - Taylor-Robinson, David
N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 18,3, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2018.10.006
PY - 2019/5/1
Y1 - 2019/5/1
N2 - BackgroundMany risk factors for lung disease in cystic fibrosis (CF) display a seasonal pattern yet it is unclear whether this is reflected in seasonal fluctuations in lung function.MethodsWe conducted a longitudinal study using CF registries in Denmark and the UK. 485 individuals with a median of 103 FEV1 measurements per person and 7622 individuals with a median of nine FEV1 measures per person were included from Denmark and the UK respectively. We estimated the effect of seasonality on percent predicted FEV1 trajectories using mixed effects models whilst adjusting for clinically important covariates.ResultsWe found no significant cyclical seasonal variation in lung function in either country. The maximum variation in percent predicted FEV1 around the yearly average was estimated to be 0.1 percentage points (95%CI 0 to 0.21) and 0.14 percentage points (95%CI 0 to 0.29) in Denmark and the UK, respectively. When considering possible step-like changes between the four seasons, we found that lung function was higher in spring compared to winter in the UK (0.34 percentage points, 95%CI 0.1 to 0.59) though the difference was not of clinical significance. ConclusionIn both the UK and Denmark there may be small seasonal changes in lung function but this effect is not of clinical importance.
AB - BackgroundMany risk factors for lung disease in cystic fibrosis (CF) display a seasonal pattern yet it is unclear whether this is reflected in seasonal fluctuations in lung function.MethodsWe conducted a longitudinal study using CF registries in Denmark and the UK. 485 individuals with a median of 103 FEV1 measurements per person and 7622 individuals with a median of nine FEV1 measures per person were included from Denmark and the UK respectively. We estimated the effect of seasonality on percent predicted FEV1 trajectories using mixed effects models whilst adjusting for clinically important covariates.ResultsWe found no significant cyclical seasonal variation in lung function in either country. The maximum variation in percent predicted FEV1 around the yearly average was estimated to be 0.1 percentage points (95%CI 0 to 0.21) and 0.14 percentage points (95%CI 0 to 0.29) in Denmark and the UK, respectively. When considering possible step-like changes between the four seasons, we found that lung function was higher in spring compared to winter in the UK (0.34 percentage points, 95%CI 0.1 to 0.59) though the difference was not of clinical significance. ConclusionIn both the UK and Denmark there may be small seasonal changes in lung function but this effect is not of clinical importance.
KW - Seasonality
KW - Season
KW - Fluctuation
KW - Percent predicted FEV1
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcf.2018.10.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jcf.2018.10.006
M3 - Journal article
VL - 18
SP - 390
EP - 395
JO - Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
JF - Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
SN - 1569-1993
IS - 3
ER -