Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Secondary school prospectuses and educational m...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Secondary school prospectuses and educational markets

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Secondary school prospectuses and educational markets. / Knight, P; Hesketh, A J.
In: Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.03.1998, p. 21-35.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Knight, P & Hesketh, AJ 1998, 'Secondary school prospectuses and educational markets', Cambridge Journal of Education, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764980280103

APA

Vancouver

Knight P, Hesketh AJ. Secondary school prospectuses and educational markets. Cambridge Journal of Education. 1998 Mar 1;28(1):21-35. doi: 10.1080/0305764980280103

Author

Knight, P ; Hesketh, A J. / Secondary school prospectuses and educational markets. In: Cambridge Journal of Education. 1998 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 21-35.

Bibtex

@article{bb6ee79866f14633aeaff035f6ea35b3,
title = "Secondary school prospectuses and educational markets",
abstract = "This study examines the 1996 prospectuses of 59 of the 100 secondary schools whose 1991 prospectuses were reviewed in a previous paper (Knight, 1992). The intention is to consider the ways in which schools present themselves in the educational market‐place. It is shown that they take the business of marketing through prospectuses seriously, evidence being the more professional appearance that these brochures now have. While other changes are also noticed, the argument is that prospectuses tend to depict schools of all types in similar ways. An explanation for this is offered, drawing upon marketing and on game theories. On this analysis, beliefs that changes in educational policy will lead to increasing differentiation of provision is, at least in terms of image‐making, exaggerated. More striking than the evidence of diversity is the evidence that schools are busily managing their images in much the same ways.",
author = "P Knight and Hesketh, {A J}",
year = "1998",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/0305764980280103",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "21--35",
journal = "Cambridge Journal of Education",
issn = "0305-764X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Secondary school prospectuses and educational markets

AU - Knight, P

AU - Hesketh, A J

PY - 1998/3/1

Y1 - 1998/3/1

N2 - This study examines the 1996 prospectuses of 59 of the 100 secondary schools whose 1991 prospectuses were reviewed in a previous paper (Knight, 1992). The intention is to consider the ways in which schools present themselves in the educational market‐place. It is shown that they take the business of marketing through prospectuses seriously, evidence being the more professional appearance that these brochures now have. While other changes are also noticed, the argument is that prospectuses tend to depict schools of all types in similar ways. An explanation for this is offered, drawing upon marketing and on game theories. On this analysis, beliefs that changes in educational policy will lead to increasing differentiation of provision is, at least in terms of image‐making, exaggerated. More striking than the evidence of diversity is the evidence that schools are busily managing their images in much the same ways.

AB - This study examines the 1996 prospectuses of 59 of the 100 secondary schools whose 1991 prospectuses were reviewed in a previous paper (Knight, 1992). The intention is to consider the ways in which schools present themselves in the educational market‐place. It is shown that they take the business of marketing through prospectuses seriously, evidence being the more professional appearance that these brochures now have. While other changes are also noticed, the argument is that prospectuses tend to depict schools of all types in similar ways. An explanation for this is offered, drawing upon marketing and on game theories. On this analysis, beliefs that changes in educational policy will lead to increasing differentiation of provision is, at least in terms of image‐making, exaggerated. More striking than the evidence of diversity is the evidence that schools are busily managing their images in much the same ways.

U2 - 10.1080/0305764980280103

DO - 10.1080/0305764980280103

M3 - Journal article

VL - 28

SP - 21

EP - 35

JO - Cambridge Journal of Education

JF - Cambridge Journal of Education

SN - 0305-764X

IS - 1

ER -