Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Second-Order Conditioning and Conditioned Inhib...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Second-Order Conditioning and Conditioned Inhibition in Different Moments of the Same Training: The Effect of A+ and AX− Trial Number

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Second-Order Conditioning and Conditioned Inhibition in Different Moments of the Same Training: The Effect of A+ and AX− Trial Number. / Muñiz-Diez, C.; Muñiz-Moreno, Judit; Loy, Ignacio.
In: Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 15, 632548, 21.04.2021.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Muñiz-Diez C, Muñiz-Moreno J, Loy I. Second-Order Conditioning and Conditioned Inhibition in Different Moments of the Same Training: The Effect of A+ and AX− Trial Number. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 2021 Apr 21;15:632548. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.632548

Author

Muñiz-Diez, C. ; Muñiz-Moreno, Judit ; Loy, Ignacio. / Second-Order Conditioning and Conditioned Inhibition in Different Moments of the Same Training : The Effect of A+ and AX− Trial Number. In: Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 2021 ; Vol. 15.

Bibtex

@article{a2cb1fe24be342cbbf01d97a9ff93a66,
title = "Second-Order Conditioning and Conditioned Inhibition in Different Moments of the Same Training: The Effect of A+ and AX− Trial Number",
abstract = "The feature negative discrimination (A+/AX -) can result in X gaining excitatory properties (second-order conditioning, SOC) or in X gaining inhibitory properties (conditioned inhibition, CI), a challenging finding for most current associative learning theories. Research on the variables that modulate which of these phenomena would occur is scarce but has clearly identified the trial number as an important variable. In the set of experiments presented here, the effect of trial number was assessed in a magazine training task with rats as a function of both the conditioning sessions and the number of A+ and AX - trials per session, holding constant the total number of trials per session. The results indicated that SOC is most likely to be found at the beginning of training when there are many A+ and few AX - trials, and CI (as assessed by a retardation test) is most likely to be found at the end of training when there are few A+ and many AX - trials. Both phenomena were also found at different moments of training when the number of A+ trials was equal to the number of AX - trials. These results cannot be predicted by acquisition-focused associative models but can be predicted by theories that distinguish between learning and performance. ",
author = "C. Mu{\~n}iz-Diez and Judit Mu{\~n}iz-Moreno and Ignacio Loy",
year = "2021",
month = apr,
day = "21",
doi = "10.3389/fnbeh.2021.632548",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-5153",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Second-Order Conditioning and Conditioned Inhibition in Different Moments of the Same Training

T2 - The Effect of A+ and AX− Trial Number

AU - Muñiz-Diez, C.

AU - Muñiz-Moreno, Judit

AU - Loy, Ignacio

PY - 2021/4/21

Y1 - 2021/4/21

N2 - The feature negative discrimination (A+/AX -) can result in X gaining excitatory properties (second-order conditioning, SOC) or in X gaining inhibitory properties (conditioned inhibition, CI), a challenging finding for most current associative learning theories. Research on the variables that modulate which of these phenomena would occur is scarce but has clearly identified the trial number as an important variable. In the set of experiments presented here, the effect of trial number was assessed in a magazine training task with rats as a function of both the conditioning sessions and the number of A+ and AX - trials per session, holding constant the total number of trials per session. The results indicated that SOC is most likely to be found at the beginning of training when there are many A+ and few AX - trials, and CI (as assessed by a retardation test) is most likely to be found at the end of training when there are few A+ and many AX - trials. Both phenomena were also found at different moments of training when the number of A+ trials was equal to the number of AX - trials. These results cannot be predicted by acquisition-focused associative models but can be predicted by theories that distinguish between learning and performance.

AB - The feature negative discrimination (A+/AX -) can result in X gaining excitatory properties (second-order conditioning, SOC) or in X gaining inhibitory properties (conditioned inhibition, CI), a challenging finding for most current associative learning theories. Research on the variables that modulate which of these phenomena would occur is scarce but has clearly identified the trial number as an important variable. In the set of experiments presented here, the effect of trial number was assessed in a magazine training task with rats as a function of both the conditioning sessions and the number of A+ and AX - trials per session, holding constant the total number of trials per session. The results indicated that SOC is most likely to be found at the beginning of training when there are many A+ and few AX - trials, and CI (as assessed by a retardation test) is most likely to be found at the end of training when there are few A+ and many AX - trials. Both phenomena were also found at different moments of training when the number of A+ trials was equal to the number of AX - trials. These results cannot be predicted by acquisition-focused associative models but can be predicted by theories that distinguish between learning and performance.

U2 - 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.632548

DO - 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.632548

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33967712

VL - 15

JO - Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

SN - 1662-5153

M1 - 632548

ER -