Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Securitising the unconscious : the Bush doctrin...
View graph of relations

Securitising the unconscious : the Bush doctrine of pre-emption and 'minority report'.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Securitising the unconscious : the Bush doctrine of pre-emption and 'minority report'. / Weber, Cynthia.
In: Geopolitics, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2005, p. 482-499.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Weber C. Securitising the unconscious : the Bush doctrine of pre-emption and 'minority report'. Geopolitics. 2005;10(3):482-499. doi: 10.1080/14650040591003499

Author

Bibtex

@article{6604e38e3e894ac08d61148dae313473,
title = "Securitising the unconscious : the Bush doctrine of pre-emption and 'minority report'.",
abstract = "Using Minority Report as its interpretive guide, this essay considers how the securitisation of the unconscious is performed in primarily fiction (film) but also 'fact' (US foreign policy). The essay makes two general arguments. Implicitly, it argues that American moralities and what I call US moral grammars of war are not only formulated in traditional realms of politics but in geopolitical moral imaginaries in which US foreign policy intersects with popular (often filmic) imaginaries as well as with narratives about the family. Elaborating on this final point about the family, the essay explicitly argues that the feminine is the keystone of the US moral grammar of war in the war on terror because it is the foundational figure upon whom a specific articulation of a moral US 'we' is constructed. What this means is that as the US 'we' looks ahead to who a future moral American US 'we' might become (which is the theme of Minority Report and a theme in everyday post-11 September American life), it ought to begin by understanding how the feminine both secures and insecures the complex relationship between justice and security, particularly as it functions in relation to the present-day Bush administration's policies of securitising the unconscious.",
author = "Cynthia Weber",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1080/14650040591003499",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "482--499",
journal = "Geopolitics",
issn = "1465-0045",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Securitising the unconscious : the Bush doctrine of pre-emption and 'minority report'.

AU - Weber, Cynthia

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Using Minority Report as its interpretive guide, this essay considers how the securitisation of the unconscious is performed in primarily fiction (film) but also 'fact' (US foreign policy). The essay makes two general arguments. Implicitly, it argues that American moralities and what I call US moral grammars of war are not only formulated in traditional realms of politics but in geopolitical moral imaginaries in which US foreign policy intersects with popular (often filmic) imaginaries as well as with narratives about the family. Elaborating on this final point about the family, the essay explicitly argues that the feminine is the keystone of the US moral grammar of war in the war on terror because it is the foundational figure upon whom a specific articulation of a moral US 'we' is constructed. What this means is that as the US 'we' looks ahead to who a future moral American US 'we' might become (which is the theme of Minority Report and a theme in everyday post-11 September American life), it ought to begin by understanding how the feminine both secures and insecures the complex relationship between justice and security, particularly as it functions in relation to the present-day Bush administration's policies of securitising the unconscious.

AB - Using Minority Report as its interpretive guide, this essay considers how the securitisation of the unconscious is performed in primarily fiction (film) but also 'fact' (US foreign policy). The essay makes two general arguments. Implicitly, it argues that American moralities and what I call US moral grammars of war are not only formulated in traditional realms of politics but in geopolitical moral imaginaries in which US foreign policy intersects with popular (often filmic) imaginaries as well as with narratives about the family. Elaborating on this final point about the family, the essay explicitly argues that the feminine is the keystone of the US moral grammar of war in the war on terror because it is the foundational figure upon whom a specific articulation of a moral US 'we' is constructed. What this means is that as the US 'we' looks ahead to who a future moral American US 'we' might become (which is the theme of Minority Report and a theme in everyday post-11 September American life), it ought to begin by understanding how the feminine both secures and insecures the complex relationship between justice and security, particularly as it functions in relation to the present-day Bush administration's policies of securitising the unconscious.

U2 - 10.1080/14650040591003499

DO - 10.1080/14650040591003499

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 482

EP - 499

JO - Geopolitics

JF - Geopolitics

SN - 1465-0045

IS - 3

ER -