Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Seeing historically: Goethe and Vygotsky’s ‘ena...
View graph of relations

Seeing historically: Goethe and Vygotsky’s ‘enabling theory-method’.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Seeing historically: Goethe and Vygotsky’s ‘enabling theory-method’. / Shotter, John.
In: Culture and Psychology, Vol. 6, No. 2, 06.2000, p. 233-252.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Shotter J. Seeing historically: Goethe and Vygotsky’s ‘enabling theory-method’. Culture and Psychology. 2000 Jun;6(2):233-252. doi: 10.1177/1354067X0062010

Author

Shotter, John. / Seeing historically: Goethe and Vygotsky’s ‘enabling theory-method’. In: Culture and Psychology. 2000 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 233-252.

Bibtex

@article{bb392731d30b4901b081ce702b4ef552,
title = "Seeing historically: Goethe and Vygotsky{\textquoteright}s {\textquoteleft}enabling theory-method{\textquoteright}.",
abstract = "We can study dead forms from a distance, seeking to understand the pattern of past events that caused them to come into existence. We can, however, enter into a relationship with living forms and, in making ourselves open to their movements, find ourselves spontaneously responding to them, and in so doing, we can gain a sense of their character. In other words, from within our dialogically structured involvements with other living things, a kind of relationally responsive understanding, quite different from the referential-representational kind of understanding familiar to us in cognitive psychology, becomes directly available to us. Thus, rather than seeking to explain a child{\textquoteright}s present activities in terms of their causes in the past, from the standpoint of an external observer, we can turn to a quite different aim: that of perceiving in a present behavior the possibilities and opportunities it offers for further developments. Orientation toward this aim is what I think is so special about both Vygotsky{\textquoteright}s and Goethe{\textquoteright}s historical methods of inquiry into the development of living forms.",
keywords = "development • dialogicality • relational-responsive • responsiveness • understanding",
author = "John Shotter",
year = "2000",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1177/1354067X0062010",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "233--252",
journal = "Culture and Psychology",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seeing historically: Goethe and Vygotsky’s ‘enabling theory-method’.

AU - Shotter, John

PY - 2000/6

Y1 - 2000/6

N2 - We can study dead forms from a distance, seeking to understand the pattern of past events that caused them to come into existence. We can, however, enter into a relationship with living forms and, in making ourselves open to their movements, find ourselves spontaneously responding to them, and in so doing, we can gain a sense of their character. In other words, from within our dialogically structured involvements with other living things, a kind of relationally responsive understanding, quite different from the referential-representational kind of understanding familiar to us in cognitive psychology, becomes directly available to us. Thus, rather than seeking to explain a child’s present activities in terms of their causes in the past, from the standpoint of an external observer, we can turn to a quite different aim: that of perceiving in a present behavior the possibilities and opportunities it offers for further developments. Orientation toward this aim is what I think is so special about both Vygotsky’s and Goethe’s historical methods of inquiry into the development of living forms.

AB - We can study dead forms from a distance, seeking to understand the pattern of past events that caused them to come into existence. We can, however, enter into a relationship with living forms and, in making ourselves open to their movements, find ourselves spontaneously responding to them, and in so doing, we can gain a sense of their character. In other words, from within our dialogically structured involvements with other living things, a kind of relationally responsive understanding, quite different from the referential-representational kind of understanding familiar to us in cognitive psychology, becomes directly available to us. Thus, rather than seeking to explain a child’s present activities in terms of their causes in the past, from the standpoint of an external observer, we can turn to a quite different aim: that of perceiving in a present behavior the possibilities and opportunities it offers for further developments. Orientation toward this aim is what I think is so special about both Vygotsky’s and Goethe’s historical methods of inquiry into the development of living forms.

KW - development • dialogicality • relational-responsive • responsiveness • understanding

U2 - 10.1177/1354067X0062010

DO - 10.1177/1354067X0062010

M3 - Journal article

VL - 6

SP - 233

EP - 252

JO - Culture and Psychology

JF - Culture and Psychology

IS - 2

ER -