Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention
View graph of relations

Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies. / Levine, M; Cassidy, C; Brazier, G et al.
In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 7, 07.2002, p. 1452-1463.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Levine, M, Cassidy, C, Brazier, G & Reicher, S 2002, 'Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies', Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1452-1463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01446.x

APA

Levine, M., Cassidy, C., Brazier, G., & Reicher, S. (2002). Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(7), 1452-1463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01446.x

Vancouver

Levine M, Cassidy C, Brazier G, Reicher S. Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2002 Jul;32(7):1452-1463. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01446.x

Author

Levine, M ; Cassidy, C ; Brazier, G et al. / Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention : Two experimental studies. In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2002 ; Vol. 32, No. 7. pp. 1452-1463.

Bibtex

@article{2e3b210de4ad48e58f23168928a6a06e,
title = "Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies",
abstract = "This paper outlines a new approach to the study of bystander intervention. Using insights derived from self-categorization theory (Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987), we explore the social category relations among those present in the context of physical violence. The paper describes two experiments that manipulate the social category relations between (a) bystander and fellow bystanders, and (b) bystander and victim. Analysis indicates that fellow bystanders are only influential when they are in-group rather than out-group members. Furthermore, bystanders are more likely to help victims who are described as in-group as opposed to out-group members. Overall, the findings suggest an important role for a self-categorization perspective in developing strategies to promote bystander intervention.",
keywords = "SOCIAL IDENTITY, EMERGENCY, BEHAVIOR, AROUSAL",
author = "M Levine and C Cassidy and G Brazier and S Reicher",
year = "2002",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01446.x",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1452--1463",
journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "1559-1816",
publisher = "V H WINSTON & SON INC",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention

T2 - Two experimental studies

AU - Levine, M

AU - Cassidy, C

AU - Brazier, G

AU - Reicher, S

PY - 2002/7

Y1 - 2002/7

N2 - This paper outlines a new approach to the study of bystander intervention. Using insights derived from self-categorization theory (Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987), we explore the social category relations among those present in the context of physical violence. The paper describes two experiments that manipulate the social category relations between (a) bystander and fellow bystanders, and (b) bystander and victim. Analysis indicates that fellow bystanders are only influential when they are in-group rather than out-group members. Furthermore, bystanders are more likely to help victims who are described as in-group as opposed to out-group members. Overall, the findings suggest an important role for a self-categorization perspective in developing strategies to promote bystander intervention.

AB - This paper outlines a new approach to the study of bystander intervention. Using insights derived from self-categorization theory (Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987), we explore the social category relations among those present in the context of physical violence. The paper describes two experiments that manipulate the social category relations between (a) bystander and fellow bystanders, and (b) bystander and victim. Analysis indicates that fellow bystanders are only influential when they are in-group rather than out-group members. Furthermore, bystanders are more likely to help victims who are described as in-group as opposed to out-group members. Overall, the findings suggest an important role for a self-categorization perspective in developing strategies to promote bystander intervention.

KW - SOCIAL IDENTITY

KW - EMERGENCY

KW - BEHAVIOR

KW - AROUSAL

U2 - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01446.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01446.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 32

SP - 1452

EP - 1463

JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

SN - 1559-1816

IS - 7

ER -