Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Service evaluation of the GOALS family-based ch...

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Service evaluation of the GOALS family-based childhood obesity treatment intervention during the first 3 years of implementation

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Service evaluation of the GOALS family-based childhood obesity treatment intervention during the first 3 years of implementation. / Watson, Paula M.; Dugdill, Lindsey; Pickering, Katie et al.
In: BMJ Open, Vol. 5, No. 2, e006519, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Watson, PM, Dugdill, L, Pickering, K, Owen, S, Hargreaves, J, Staniford, LJ, Murphy, RC, Knowles, Z & Cable, NT 2015, 'Service evaluation of the GOALS family-based childhood obesity treatment intervention during the first 3 years of implementation', BMJ Open, vol. 5, no. 2, e006519. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006519

APA

Watson, P. M., Dugdill, L., Pickering, K., Owen, S., Hargreaves, J., Staniford, L. J., Murphy, R. C., Knowles, Z., & Cable, N. T. (2015). Service evaluation of the GOALS family-based childhood obesity treatment intervention during the first 3 years of implementation. BMJ Open, 5(2), Article e006519. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006519

Vancouver

Watson PM, Dugdill L, Pickering K, Owen S, Hargreaves J, Staniford LJ et al. Service evaluation of the GOALS family-based childhood obesity treatment intervention during the first 3 years of implementation. BMJ Open. 2015;5(2):e006519. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006519

Author

Watson, Paula M. ; Dugdill, Lindsey ; Pickering, Katie et al. / Service evaluation of the GOALS family-based childhood obesity treatment intervention during the first 3 years of implementation. In: BMJ Open. 2015 ; Vol. 5, No. 2.

Bibtex

@article{ad5117ea9d814441a4f124168d79b5da,
title = "Service evaluation of the GOALS family-based childhood obesity treatment intervention during the first 3 years of implementation",
abstract = "Objectives: To evaluate the impact of the GOALS (Getting Our Active Lifestyles Started) family-based childhood obesity treatment intervention during the first 3 years of implementation. Design: Single-group repeated measures with qualitative questionnaires. Setting: Community venues in a socioeconomically deprived, urban location in the North-West of England. Participants: 70 overweight or obese children (mean age 10.5 years, 46% boys) and their parents/carers who completed GOALS between September 2006 and March 2009. Interventions: GOALS was a childhood obesity treatment intervention that drew on social cognitive theory to promote whole family lifestyle change. Sessions covered physical activity (PA), diet and behaviour change over 182h weekly group sessions (lasting approximately 6 months). A Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist of intervention components is provided. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was child body mass index (BMI) z-score, collected at baseline, post-intervention and 12 months. Secondary outcome measures were child self-perceptions, parent/carer BMI and qualitative changes in family diet and PA (parent/carer questionnaire). Results: Child BMI z-score reduced by 0.07 from baseline to post-intervention (p<0.001) and was maintained at 12 months (p<0.05). There was no change in parent/carer BMI or child self-perceptions, other than an increase in perceived social acceptance from baseline to post-intervention (p<0.05). Parents/carers reported positive changes to family PA and dietary behaviours after completing GOALS. Conclusions: GOALS completion was associated with small improvements in child BMI z-score and improved family PA and dietary behaviours. Several intervention modifications were necessary during the implementation period and it is suggested childhood obesity treatment interventions need time to embed before a definitive evaluation is conducted. Researchers are urged to use the TIDieR checklist to ensure transparent reporting of interventions and facilitate the translation of evidence to practice.",
author = "Watson, {Paula M.} and Lindsey Dugdill and Katie Pickering and Stephanie Owen and Jackie Hargreaves and Staniford, {Leanne J.} and Murphy, {Rebecca C.} and Zoe Knowles and Cable, {N. Timothy}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006519",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Service evaluation of the GOALS family-based childhood obesity treatment intervention during the first 3 years of implementation

AU - Watson, Paula M.

AU - Dugdill, Lindsey

AU - Pickering, Katie

AU - Owen, Stephanie

AU - Hargreaves, Jackie

AU - Staniford, Leanne J.

AU - Murphy, Rebecca C.

AU - Knowles, Zoe

AU - Cable, N. Timothy

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the impact of the GOALS (Getting Our Active Lifestyles Started) family-based childhood obesity treatment intervention during the first 3 years of implementation. Design: Single-group repeated measures with qualitative questionnaires. Setting: Community venues in a socioeconomically deprived, urban location in the North-West of England. Participants: 70 overweight or obese children (mean age 10.5 years, 46% boys) and their parents/carers who completed GOALS between September 2006 and March 2009. Interventions: GOALS was a childhood obesity treatment intervention that drew on social cognitive theory to promote whole family lifestyle change. Sessions covered physical activity (PA), diet and behaviour change over 182h weekly group sessions (lasting approximately 6 months). A Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist of intervention components is provided. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was child body mass index (BMI) z-score, collected at baseline, post-intervention and 12 months. Secondary outcome measures were child self-perceptions, parent/carer BMI and qualitative changes in family diet and PA (parent/carer questionnaire). Results: Child BMI z-score reduced by 0.07 from baseline to post-intervention (p<0.001) and was maintained at 12 months (p<0.05). There was no change in parent/carer BMI or child self-perceptions, other than an increase in perceived social acceptance from baseline to post-intervention (p<0.05). Parents/carers reported positive changes to family PA and dietary behaviours after completing GOALS. Conclusions: GOALS completion was associated with small improvements in child BMI z-score and improved family PA and dietary behaviours. Several intervention modifications were necessary during the implementation period and it is suggested childhood obesity treatment interventions need time to embed before a definitive evaluation is conducted. Researchers are urged to use the TIDieR checklist to ensure transparent reporting of interventions and facilitate the translation of evidence to practice.

AB - Objectives: To evaluate the impact of the GOALS (Getting Our Active Lifestyles Started) family-based childhood obesity treatment intervention during the first 3 years of implementation. Design: Single-group repeated measures with qualitative questionnaires. Setting: Community venues in a socioeconomically deprived, urban location in the North-West of England. Participants: 70 overweight or obese children (mean age 10.5 years, 46% boys) and their parents/carers who completed GOALS between September 2006 and March 2009. Interventions: GOALS was a childhood obesity treatment intervention that drew on social cognitive theory to promote whole family lifestyle change. Sessions covered physical activity (PA), diet and behaviour change over 182h weekly group sessions (lasting approximately 6 months). A Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist of intervention components is provided. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was child body mass index (BMI) z-score, collected at baseline, post-intervention and 12 months. Secondary outcome measures were child self-perceptions, parent/carer BMI and qualitative changes in family diet and PA (parent/carer questionnaire). Results: Child BMI z-score reduced by 0.07 from baseline to post-intervention (p<0.001) and was maintained at 12 months (p<0.05). There was no change in parent/carer BMI or child self-perceptions, other than an increase in perceived social acceptance from baseline to post-intervention (p<0.05). Parents/carers reported positive changes to family PA and dietary behaviours after completing GOALS. Conclusions: GOALS completion was associated with small improvements in child BMI z-score and improved family PA and dietary behaviours. Several intervention modifications were necessary during the implementation period and it is suggested childhood obesity treatment interventions need time to embed before a definitive evaluation is conducted. Researchers are urged to use the TIDieR checklist to ensure transparent reporting of interventions and facilitate the translation of evidence to practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922376695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006519

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006519

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25652799

AN - SCOPUS:84922376695

VL - 5

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 2

M1 - e006519

ER -