Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Service, services and products: rethinking oper...
View graph of relations

Service, services and products: rethinking operations strategy

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Service, services and products: rethinking operations strategy. / Spring, M; Araujo, L M.
In: International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 29, No. 5, 2009, p. 444-467.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Spring, M & Araujo, LM 2009, 'Service, services and products: rethinking operations strategy', International Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 444-467. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570910953586

APA

Spring, M., & Araujo, L. M. (2009). Service, services and products: rethinking operations strategy. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 29(5), 444-467. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570910953586

Vancouver

Spring M, Araujo LM. Service, services and products: rethinking operations strategy. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. 2009;29(5):444-467. doi: 10.1108/01443570910953586

Author

Spring, M ; Araujo, L M. / Service, services and products: rethinking operations strategy. In: International Journal of Operations and Production Management. 2009 ; Vol. 29, No. 5. pp. 444-467.

Bibtex

@article{0daffe264efd496393703cababc52fcf,
title = "Service, services and products: rethinking operations strategy",
abstract = "Purpose – This paper proposes a new approach to operations and supply strategy in the light of recent developments in the analysis of the respective roles of products and services in delivering benefits to customers. Design/methodology/approach – Reviews and synthesises concepts from operations management (OM), marketing, economics and related areas. Examples of product and service combinations are considered, drawing attention to the ways in which services may be distinguished from products. An institutional basis for defining services is favoured over IHIP. A corollary of this is how services are made tradable: the modularity theory of the firm is used to do this. The paper then outlines, considers and compares various approaches to the combination of products and services: “service-dominant logic”, support services, product-service systems, systems integration, performance-based logistics, bundling and, finally, the notion of “the offering”. Findings – It is found that the notion of the business model is useful as an integrating concept. This focuses on four areas: network structure, how transactions are made, how revenue models and incentives interact and how capabilities are accessed. Implications for future research in OM are considered. Research limitations/implications – Hitherto, operations strategy (OS) has concentrated on intra-firm capabilities, which is only part of one of the four areas identified. Therefore, an extensive agenda for research into inter-firm capabilities and the other three areas identified is presented. Originality/value – This is among the first papers in OM to break completely with IHIP as a basis for service definition and to work through the implications for OS. It is also the first to develop systematically an understanding of how the emerging concept of the business model can inform OM.",
author = "M Spring and Araujo, {L M}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1108/01443570910953586",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "444--467",
journal = "International Journal of Operations and Production Management",
issn = "0144-3577",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Service, services and products: rethinking operations strategy

AU - Spring, M

AU - Araujo, L M

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Purpose – This paper proposes a new approach to operations and supply strategy in the light of recent developments in the analysis of the respective roles of products and services in delivering benefits to customers. Design/methodology/approach – Reviews and synthesises concepts from operations management (OM), marketing, economics and related areas. Examples of product and service combinations are considered, drawing attention to the ways in which services may be distinguished from products. An institutional basis for defining services is favoured over IHIP. A corollary of this is how services are made tradable: the modularity theory of the firm is used to do this. The paper then outlines, considers and compares various approaches to the combination of products and services: “service-dominant logic”, support services, product-service systems, systems integration, performance-based logistics, bundling and, finally, the notion of “the offering”. Findings – It is found that the notion of the business model is useful as an integrating concept. This focuses on four areas: network structure, how transactions are made, how revenue models and incentives interact and how capabilities are accessed. Implications for future research in OM are considered. Research limitations/implications – Hitherto, operations strategy (OS) has concentrated on intra-firm capabilities, which is only part of one of the four areas identified. Therefore, an extensive agenda for research into inter-firm capabilities and the other three areas identified is presented. Originality/value – This is among the first papers in OM to break completely with IHIP as a basis for service definition and to work through the implications for OS. It is also the first to develop systematically an understanding of how the emerging concept of the business model can inform OM.

AB - Purpose – This paper proposes a new approach to operations and supply strategy in the light of recent developments in the analysis of the respective roles of products and services in delivering benefits to customers. Design/methodology/approach – Reviews and synthesises concepts from operations management (OM), marketing, economics and related areas. Examples of product and service combinations are considered, drawing attention to the ways in which services may be distinguished from products. An institutional basis for defining services is favoured over IHIP. A corollary of this is how services are made tradable: the modularity theory of the firm is used to do this. The paper then outlines, considers and compares various approaches to the combination of products and services: “service-dominant logic”, support services, product-service systems, systems integration, performance-based logistics, bundling and, finally, the notion of “the offering”. Findings – It is found that the notion of the business model is useful as an integrating concept. This focuses on four areas: network structure, how transactions are made, how revenue models and incentives interact and how capabilities are accessed. Implications for future research in OM are considered. Research limitations/implications – Hitherto, operations strategy (OS) has concentrated on intra-firm capabilities, which is only part of one of the four areas identified. Therefore, an extensive agenda for research into inter-firm capabilities and the other three areas identified is presented. Originality/value – This is among the first papers in OM to break completely with IHIP as a basis for service definition and to work through the implications for OS. It is also the first to develop systematically an understanding of how the emerging concept of the business model can inform OM.

U2 - 10.1108/01443570910953586

DO - 10.1108/01443570910953586

M3 - Journal article

VL - 29

SP - 444

EP - 467

JO - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

JF - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

SN - 0144-3577

IS - 5

ER -