Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Settlement and unsettlement in Aotearoa/New Zea...

Electronic data

  • Settlement and unsettlement in Aotearoa/New Zealand and Antarctica

    Rights statement: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=POL The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Polar Record, 41 (2), pp 141-155 2005, © 2005 Cambridge University

    Final published version, 259 KB, PDF document


Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Settlement and unsettlement in Aotearoa/New Zealand and Antarctica

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

<mark>Journal publication date</mark>2005
<mark>Journal</mark>Polar Record
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)141–155
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date27/04/05
<mark>Original language</mark>English


This paper is concerned with Aotearoa/New Zealand’s changing relationship to Antarctica, and the Ross Dependency in particular. Through a consideration of post-colonial theory in the Ross Dependency, it is argued that a productive dialogue about the cultural politics of mainland Aotearoa/New Zealand can be opened up. After some reflections on the post-1945 political and cultural trajectory of the country, attention is given to the place of the Maori and their involvement in the polar continent and Southern Ocean. The adoption of Maori place-names on New Zealand maps of the Ross Dependency is considered further because it helps to illuminate the country’s awkward and incomplete post-colonial transformation. Arguably, such an adoption of Maori place-names in Antarctica contributes to a vision of bicultural harmony. However, this is not a view shared by all observers. Developments affecting the crown agency Antarctica New Zealand, alongside recent heritage projects, are scrutinised further in order to consider how Maori–Pakeha relations influence and define contemporary understandings of New Zealand’s presence in Antarctica.
Finally, the paper briefly contemplates how a trans-Tasman dialogue with Australian scholars might enable further analysis into how geographically proximate settler colonies engage with Antarctica and their associated territorial
claims to the continent and surrounding ocean.