Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Sex @ the end of the twentieth century: some re...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Sex @ the end of the twentieth century: some re-marks on a minor jurisprudence.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article

Published

Standard

Sex @ the end of the twentieth century: some re-marks on a minor jurisprudence. / Loizidou, Elena.
In: Law and Critique, Vol. 10, No. 1, 01.1999, p. 71-86.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article

Harvard

Loizidou, E 1999, 'Sex @ the end of the twentieth century: some re-marks on a minor jurisprudence.', Law and Critique, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008942629557

APA

Loizidou, E. (1999). Sex @ the end of the twentieth century: some re-marks on a minor jurisprudence. Law and Critique, 10(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008942629557

Vancouver

Loizidou E. Sex @ the end of the twentieth century: some re-marks on a minor jurisprudence. Law and Critique. 1999 Jan;10(1):71-86. doi: 10.1023/A:1008942629557

Author

Loizidou, Elena. / Sex @ the end of the twentieth century: some re-marks on a minor jurisprudence. In: Law and Critique. 1999 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 71-86.

Bibtex

@article{aa2f4165dd4d4111aa2e6e9a83836d59,
title = "Sex @ the end of the twentieth century: some re-marks on a minor jurisprudence.",
abstract = "This article offers a re-reading of Goodrichs essay, Law in the Courts of Love. My contention here is that the idiom of love that Goodrich provides us with in this essay cannot address the complexity of sexuality and sexual politics that inhabit our contemporary technoscientific culture. In so doing, I will juxtapose his essay with Laven Berlant and Michael Warners essay, Public Sex. This article will be divided into three sections. In the first section, I will evaluate and review Goodrichs genealogical approach to law and the image of justice that arises out of his approach. The second section will be a re-reading of Goodrichs Law in the Courts of Love through feminist and technoscientific discourses. Its aim is to problematise and re-think not only the idiom of feminine justice that Goodrich offers, but also to question the presuppositions upon which his work is based, primary presuppositions surrounding issues of privacy, sexuality and sexuated rights. Finally, in the third section I will conclude by suggesting that the re-figuration of justice necessitates a re-figuration of the relationship that law has with time and space.",
keywords = "culture - Goodrich - justice - law - privacy - sexuality - sexuated rights",
author = "Elena Loizidou",
year = "1999",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1023/A:1008942629557",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "71--86",
journal = "Law and Critique",
issn = "0957-8536",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex @ the end of the twentieth century: some re-marks on a minor jurisprudence.

AU - Loizidou, Elena

PY - 1999/1

Y1 - 1999/1

N2 - This article offers a re-reading of Goodrichs essay, Law in the Courts of Love. My contention here is that the idiom of love that Goodrich provides us with in this essay cannot address the complexity of sexuality and sexual politics that inhabit our contemporary technoscientific culture. In so doing, I will juxtapose his essay with Laven Berlant and Michael Warners essay, Public Sex. This article will be divided into three sections. In the first section, I will evaluate and review Goodrichs genealogical approach to law and the image of justice that arises out of his approach. The second section will be a re-reading of Goodrichs Law in the Courts of Love through feminist and technoscientific discourses. Its aim is to problematise and re-think not only the idiom of feminine justice that Goodrich offers, but also to question the presuppositions upon which his work is based, primary presuppositions surrounding issues of privacy, sexuality and sexuated rights. Finally, in the third section I will conclude by suggesting that the re-figuration of justice necessitates a re-figuration of the relationship that law has with time and space.

AB - This article offers a re-reading of Goodrichs essay, Law in the Courts of Love. My contention here is that the idiom of love that Goodrich provides us with in this essay cannot address the complexity of sexuality and sexual politics that inhabit our contemporary technoscientific culture. In so doing, I will juxtapose his essay with Laven Berlant and Michael Warners essay, Public Sex. This article will be divided into three sections. In the first section, I will evaluate and review Goodrichs genealogical approach to law and the image of justice that arises out of his approach. The second section will be a re-reading of Goodrichs Law in the Courts of Love through feminist and technoscientific discourses. Its aim is to problematise and re-think not only the idiom of feminine justice that Goodrich offers, but also to question the presuppositions upon which his work is based, primary presuppositions surrounding issues of privacy, sexuality and sexuated rights. Finally, in the third section I will conclude by suggesting that the re-figuration of justice necessitates a re-figuration of the relationship that law has with time and space.

KW - culture - Goodrich - justice - law - privacy - sexuality - sexuated rights

U2 - 10.1023/A:1008942629557

DO - 10.1023/A:1008942629557

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 71

EP - 86

JO - Law and Critique

JF - Law and Critique

SN - 0957-8536

IS - 1

ER -