Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Sex identification from the auricular surface o...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Sex identification from the auricular surface of the adult human ilium

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Sex identification from the auricular surface of the adult human ilium. / Ali, R. S.; Maclaughlin, S. M.
In: International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1991, p. 57-61.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Ali, RS & Maclaughlin, SM 1991, 'Sex identification from the auricular surface of the adult human ilium', International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 57-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.1390010108

APA

Vancouver

Ali RS, Maclaughlin SM. Sex identification from the auricular surface of the adult human ilium. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. 1991;1(1):57-61. doi: 10.1002/oa.1390010108

Author

Ali, R. S. ; Maclaughlin, S. M. / Sex identification from the auricular surface of the adult human ilium. In: International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. 1991 ; Vol. 1, No. 1. pp. 57-61.

Bibtex

@article{8b09aa58b7514ecd97bec764dbed0bdb,
title = "Sex identification from the auricular surface of the adult human ilium",
abstract = "The sacro-iliac joint has largely been excluded in studies of sex identification from the adult human skeleton. Yet this is a joint involved in the transmission of body weight and as such would be expected to exhibit sexual dimorphism. In addition, the auricular surface of the ilium tends to persist even in fragmented remains by virtue of its close proximity to the acetabulo-cristal buttress.The aim of this investigation was to assess the accuracy with which sex could be predicted from dimensions of the auricular surface of the ilium.Significant sex differences were found in the size and shape of the auricular surface. However, these differences were of insufficient magnitude to permit discrimination between the sexes with any acceptable degree of accuracy. Therefore, the auricular surface of the ilium is not recommended for the purpose of sex identification.",
author = "Ali, {R. S.} and Maclaughlin, {S. M.}",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1002/oa.1390010108",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "57--61",
journal = "International Journal of Osteoarchaeology",
issn = "1047-482X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex identification from the auricular surface of the adult human ilium

AU - Ali, R. S.

AU - Maclaughlin, S. M.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - The sacro-iliac joint has largely been excluded in studies of sex identification from the adult human skeleton. Yet this is a joint involved in the transmission of body weight and as such would be expected to exhibit sexual dimorphism. In addition, the auricular surface of the ilium tends to persist even in fragmented remains by virtue of its close proximity to the acetabulo-cristal buttress.The aim of this investigation was to assess the accuracy with which sex could be predicted from dimensions of the auricular surface of the ilium.Significant sex differences were found in the size and shape of the auricular surface. However, these differences were of insufficient magnitude to permit discrimination between the sexes with any acceptable degree of accuracy. Therefore, the auricular surface of the ilium is not recommended for the purpose of sex identification.

AB - The sacro-iliac joint has largely been excluded in studies of sex identification from the adult human skeleton. Yet this is a joint involved in the transmission of body weight and as such would be expected to exhibit sexual dimorphism. In addition, the auricular surface of the ilium tends to persist even in fragmented remains by virtue of its close proximity to the acetabulo-cristal buttress.The aim of this investigation was to assess the accuracy with which sex could be predicted from dimensions of the auricular surface of the ilium.Significant sex differences were found in the size and shape of the auricular surface. However, these differences were of insufficient magnitude to permit discrimination between the sexes with any acceptable degree of accuracy. Therefore, the auricular surface of the ilium is not recommended for the purpose of sex identification.

U2 - 10.1002/oa.1390010108

DO - 10.1002/oa.1390010108

M3 - Journal article

VL - 1

SP - 57

EP - 61

JO - International Journal of Osteoarchaeology

JF - International Journal of Osteoarchaeology

SN - 1047-482X

IS - 1

ER -