Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Shadow writing and participant observation
View graph of relations

Shadow writing and participant observation: a study of criminal justice social work around sentencing

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Shadow writing and participant observation: a study of criminal justice social work around sentencing. / Halliday, Simon; Burns, Nicola; Hutton, Neil et al.
In: Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 35, No. 2, 06.2008, p. 189-213.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Halliday, S, Burns, N, Hutton, N, McNeill, F & Tata, C 2008, 'Shadow writing and participant observation: a study of criminal justice social work around sentencing', Journal of Law and Society, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 189-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2008.00435.x

APA

Halliday, S., Burns, N., Hutton, N., McNeill, F., & Tata, C. (2008). Shadow writing and participant observation: a study of criminal justice social work around sentencing. Journal of Law and Society, 35(2), 189-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2008.00435.x

Vancouver

Halliday S, Burns N, Hutton N, McNeill F, Tata C. Shadow writing and participant observation: a study of criminal justice social work around sentencing. Journal of Law and Society. 2008 Jun;35(2):189-213. Epub 2008 May 9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2008.00435.x

Author

Halliday, Simon ; Burns, Nicola ; Hutton, Neil et al. / Shadow writing and participant observation : a study of criminal justice social work around sentencing. In: Journal of Law and Society. 2008 ; Vol. 35, No. 2. pp. 189-213.

Bibtex

@article{3f636eb28b37496da50672bb748aac8e,
title = "Shadow writing and participant observation: a study of criminal justice social work around sentencing",
abstract = "The study of decision-making by public officials in administrative settings has been a mainstay of law and society scholarship for decades. The methodological challenges posed by this research agenda are well understood: how can socio-legal researchers get inside the heads of legal decision-makers in order to understand the uses of official discretion? This article describes an ethnographic technique the authors developed to help them penetrate the decision-making practices of criminal justice social workers in writing pre-sentence reports for the courts. This technique, called shadow writing, involved a particular form of participant observation whereby the researcher mimicked the process of report writing in parallel with the social workers. By comparing these shadow reports with the real reports in a training-like setting, the social workers revealed in detail the subtleties of their communicative strategies embedded in particular reports and their sensibilities about report writing more generally",
author = "Simon Halliday and Nicola Burns and Neil Hutton and Fergus McNeill and Cyrus Tata",
year = "2008",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-6478.2008.00435.x",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "189--213",
journal = "Journal of Law and Society",
issn = "0263-323X",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shadow writing and participant observation

T2 - a study of criminal justice social work around sentencing

AU - Halliday, Simon

AU - Burns, Nicola

AU - Hutton, Neil

AU - McNeill, Fergus

AU - Tata, Cyrus

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - The study of decision-making by public officials in administrative settings has been a mainstay of law and society scholarship for decades. The methodological challenges posed by this research agenda are well understood: how can socio-legal researchers get inside the heads of legal decision-makers in order to understand the uses of official discretion? This article describes an ethnographic technique the authors developed to help them penetrate the decision-making practices of criminal justice social workers in writing pre-sentence reports for the courts. This technique, called shadow writing, involved a particular form of participant observation whereby the researcher mimicked the process of report writing in parallel with the social workers. By comparing these shadow reports with the real reports in a training-like setting, the social workers revealed in detail the subtleties of their communicative strategies embedded in particular reports and their sensibilities about report writing more generally

AB - The study of decision-making by public officials in administrative settings has been a mainstay of law and society scholarship for decades. The methodological challenges posed by this research agenda are well understood: how can socio-legal researchers get inside the heads of legal decision-makers in order to understand the uses of official discretion? This article describes an ethnographic technique the authors developed to help them penetrate the decision-making practices of criminal justice social workers in writing pre-sentence reports for the courts. This technique, called shadow writing, involved a particular form of participant observation whereby the researcher mimicked the process of report writing in parallel with the social workers. By comparing these shadow reports with the real reports in a training-like setting, the social workers revealed in detail the subtleties of their communicative strategies embedded in particular reports and their sensibilities about report writing more generally

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2008.00435.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2008.00435.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 35

SP - 189

EP - 213

JO - Journal of Law and Society

JF - Journal of Law and Society

SN - 0263-323X

IS - 2

ER -