Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Shenandoah Watershed Study

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Shenandoah Watershed Study: Calibration of a Topography‐Based, Variable Contributing Area Hydrological Model to a Small Forested Catchment

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Shenandoah Watershed Study: Calibration of a Topography‐Based, Variable Contributing Area Hydrological Model to a Small Forested Catchment. / Hornberger, G. M.; Beven, K. J.; Cosby, B. J. et al.
In: Water Resources Research, Vol. 21, No. 12, 01.12.1985, p. 1841-1850.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Hornberger GM, Beven KJ, Cosby BJ, Sappington DE. Shenandoah Watershed Study: Calibration of a Topography‐Based, Variable Contributing Area Hydrological Model to a Small Forested Catchment. Water Resources Research. 1985 Dec 1;21(12):1841-1850. doi: 10.1029/WR021i012p01841

Author

Hornberger, G. M. ; Beven, K. J. ; Cosby, B. J. et al. / Shenandoah Watershed Study : Calibration of a Topography‐Based, Variable Contributing Area Hydrological Model to a Small Forested Catchment. In: Water Resources Research. 1985 ; Vol. 21, No. 12. pp. 1841-1850.

Bibtex

@article{e25c739d9b2847658acc8b1606f14634,
title = "Shenandoah Watershed Study: Calibration of a Topography‐Based, Variable Contributing Area Hydrological Model to a Small Forested Catchment",
abstract = "The topography‐based, variable contributing area model of catchment hydrology of K. J. Beven and E. F. Wood (1983) was adapted for continuous simulation and extended to take account of observed processes in White Oak Run, a small forested catchment in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia. Automatic calibration of the model was attempted using eight different objective functions. All objective functions were indifferent to many of the model parameters and thus parameter estimation could not be done reliably. On the basis of results from a regionalized sensitivity analysis, the original model structure was greatly simplified. The parameters of the simplified model, which produced fits to the measured data very nearly as good as did the more complex model, were estimated well using a sum of squared errors criterion.",
author = "Hornberger, {G. M.} and Beven, {K. J.} and Cosby, {B. J.} and Sappington, {D. E.}",
year = "1985",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1029/WR021i012p01841",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "1841--1850",
journal = "Water Resources Research",
issn = "0043-1397",
publisher = "AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shenandoah Watershed Study

T2 - Calibration of a Topography‐Based, Variable Contributing Area Hydrological Model to a Small Forested Catchment

AU - Hornberger, G. M.

AU - Beven, K. J.

AU - Cosby, B. J.

AU - Sappington, D. E.

PY - 1985/12/1

Y1 - 1985/12/1

N2 - The topography‐based, variable contributing area model of catchment hydrology of K. J. Beven and E. F. Wood (1983) was adapted for continuous simulation and extended to take account of observed processes in White Oak Run, a small forested catchment in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia. Automatic calibration of the model was attempted using eight different objective functions. All objective functions were indifferent to many of the model parameters and thus parameter estimation could not be done reliably. On the basis of results from a regionalized sensitivity analysis, the original model structure was greatly simplified. The parameters of the simplified model, which produced fits to the measured data very nearly as good as did the more complex model, were estimated well using a sum of squared errors criterion.

AB - The topography‐based, variable contributing area model of catchment hydrology of K. J. Beven and E. F. Wood (1983) was adapted for continuous simulation and extended to take account of observed processes in White Oak Run, a small forested catchment in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia. Automatic calibration of the model was attempted using eight different objective functions. All objective functions were indifferent to many of the model parameters and thus parameter estimation could not be done reliably. On the basis of results from a regionalized sensitivity analysis, the original model structure was greatly simplified. The parameters of the simplified model, which produced fits to the measured data very nearly as good as did the more complex model, were estimated well using a sum of squared errors criterion.

U2 - 10.1029/WR021i012p01841

DO - 10.1029/WR021i012p01841

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:0022264619

VL - 21

SP - 1841

EP - 1850

JO - Water Resources Research

JF - Water Resources Research

SN - 0043-1397

IS - 12

ER -