Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Shoreline mapping from coarse–spatial resolutio...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Shoreline mapping from coarse–spatial resolution remote sensing imagery of Seberang Takir, Malaysia

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Shoreline mapping from coarse–spatial resolution remote sensing imagery of Seberang Takir, Malaysia. / Muslim, Aidy M.-; Foody, Giles M.; Atkinson, Peter M.
In: Journal of Coastal Research, Vol. 23, No. 6, 11.2007, p. 1399-1408.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Muslim AM, Foody GM, Atkinson PM. Shoreline mapping from coarse–spatial resolution remote sensing imagery of Seberang Takir, Malaysia. Journal of Coastal Research. 2007 Nov;23(6):1399-1408. doi: 10.2112/04-0421.1

Author

Muslim, Aidy M.- ; Foody, Giles M. ; Atkinson, Peter M. / Shoreline mapping from coarse–spatial resolution remote sensing imagery of Seberang Takir, Malaysia. In: Journal of Coastal Research. 2007 ; Vol. 23, No. 6. pp. 1399-1408.

Bibtex

@article{6a0e241f262c4bad9f46e92f9b8ae7a7,
title = "Shoreline mapping from coarse–spatial resolution remote sensing imagery of Seberang Takir, Malaysia",
abstract = "The coastal zone is under considerable pressure from development and is subject to change. Consequently, shoreline monitoring has grown in importance. Remotely sensed imagery from satellite sensors has been used as an alternative to conventional methods, such as those based on the interpretation of aerial photography and ground-based surveying, for monitoring shoreline position. However, the accuracy of shoreline mapping from satellite sensor imagery has been limited because of the relatively coarse spatial resolution (>10 m) of the sensors commonly used. Because of major practical and financial constraints, very fine spatial resolution (<5 m) data are often impractical for mapping large stretches of shoreline, so refinement of image analysis methods are needed to extract the desired subpixel-scale information from relatively coarse spatial resolution imagery. In this paper, the potential to map the shoreline at a subpixel scale from a soft classification of relatively coarse spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery was evaluated. Unlike conventional approaches, the methods used allowed the shoreline to be mapped within image pixels and have the potential to yield an accurate and realistic prediction of shoreline location. The approach involved the use of a soft image classification to estimate the subpixel-scale thematic composition of image pixels, which were then located geographically through postclassification analysis. Specifically, a contouring and geostatistical method based on a two-point histogram was used to position geographically the shoreline within image pixels. The approach was applied to differently shaped shoreline extracts in imagery at two spatial resolutions. The most accurate prediction of the shoreline position from images with 16- and 32-m spatial resolutions were typically for a simple linear stretch of coast for which the smallest root mean square error values were ≤1.20 m. The shoreline predictions satisfied the map accuracy standards specified for large-scale maps.",
keywords = "Remote sensing, subpixel, soft classification, super-resolution, contouring, two-point histogram",
author = "Muslim, {Aidy M.-} and Foody, {Giles M.} and Atkinson, {Peter M.}",
note = "M1 - 6",
year = "2007",
month = nov,
doi = "10.2112/04-0421.1",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1399--1408",
journal = "Journal of Coastal Research",
issn = "0749-0208",
publisher = "Coastal Education Research Foundation Inc.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shoreline mapping from coarse–spatial resolution remote sensing imagery of Seberang Takir, Malaysia

AU - Muslim, Aidy M.-

AU - Foody, Giles M.

AU - Atkinson, Peter M.

N1 - M1 - 6

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - The coastal zone is under considerable pressure from development and is subject to change. Consequently, shoreline monitoring has grown in importance. Remotely sensed imagery from satellite sensors has been used as an alternative to conventional methods, such as those based on the interpretation of aerial photography and ground-based surveying, for monitoring shoreline position. However, the accuracy of shoreline mapping from satellite sensor imagery has been limited because of the relatively coarse spatial resolution (>10 m) of the sensors commonly used. Because of major practical and financial constraints, very fine spatial resolution (<5 m) data are often impractical for mapping large stretches of shoreline, so refinement of image analysis methods are needed to extract the desired subpixel-scale information from relatively coarse spatial resolution imagery. In this paper, the potential to map the shoreline at a subpixel scale from a soft classification of relatively coarse spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery was evaluated. Unlike conventional approaches, the methods used allowed the shoreline to be mapped within image pixels and have the potential to yield an accurate and realistic prediction of shoreline location. The approach involved the use of a soft image classification to estimate the subpixel-scale thematic composition of image pixels, which were then located geographically through postclassification analysis. Specifically, a contouring and geostatistical method based on a two-point histogram was used to position geographically the shoreline within image pixels. The approach was applied to differently shaped shoreline extracts in imagery at two spatial resolutions. The most accurate prediction of the shoreline position from images with 16- and 32-m spatial resolutions were typically for a simple linear stretch of coast for which the smallest root mean square error values were ≤1.20 m. The shoreline predictions satisfied the map accuracy standards specified for large-scale maps.

AB - The coastal zone is under considerable pressure from development and is subject to change. Consequently, shoreline monitoring has grown in importance. Remotely sensed imagery from satellite sensors has been used as an alternative to conventional methods, such as those based on the interpretation of aerial photography and ground-based surveying, for monitoring shoreline position. However, the accuracy of shoreline mapping from satellite sensor imagery has been limited because of the relatively coarse spatial resolution (>10 m) of the sensors commonly used. Because of major practical and financial constraints, very fine spatial resolution (<5 m) data are often impractical for mapping large stretches of shoreline, so refinement of image analysis methods are needed to extract the desired subpixel-scale information from relatively coarse spatial resolution imagery. In this paper, the potential to map the shoreline at a subpixel scale from a soft classification of relatively coarse spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery was evaluated. Unlike conventional approaches, the methods used allowed the shoreline to be mapped within image pixels and have the potential to yield an accurate and realistic prediction of shoreline location. The approach involved the use of a soft image classification to estimate the subpixel-scale thematic composition of image pixels, which were then located geographically through postclassification analysis. Specifically, a contouring and geostatistical method based on a two-point histogram was used to position geographically the shoreline within image pixels. The approach was applied to differently shaped shoreline extracts in imagery at two spatial resolutions. The most accurate prediction of the shoreline position from images with 16- and 32-m spatial resolutions were typically for a simple linear stretch of coast for which the smallest root mean square error values were ≤1.20 m. The shoreline predictions satisfied the map accuracy standards specified for large-scale maps.

KW - Remote sensing

KW - subpixel

KW - soft classification

KW - super-resolution

KW - contouring

KW - two-point histogram

U2 - 10.2112/04-0421.1

DO - 10.2112/04-0421.1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 1399

EP - 1408

JO - Journal of Coastal Research

JF - Journal of Coastal Research

SN - 0749-0208

IS - 6

ER -