Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Should selecting saviour siblings be banned?
View graph of relations

Should selecting saviour siblings be banned?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Should selecting saviour siblings be banned? / Sheldon, S.; Wilkinson, Stephen.

In: Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 30, No. 6, 2004, p. 533-537.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Sheldon, S & Wilkinson, S 2004, 'Should selecting saviour siblings be banned?', Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 533-537. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2003.004150

APA

Vancouver

Author

Sheldon, S. ; Wilkinson, Stephen. / Should selecting saviour siblings be banned?. In: Journal of Medical Ethics. 2004 ; Vol. 30, No. 6. pp. 533-537.

Bibtex

@article{760d3b6a2e4e408c9c43e5860204c91a,
title = "Should selecting saviour siblings be banned?",
abstract = "By using tissue typing in conjunction with preimplantation genetic diagnosis doctors are able to pick a human embryo for implantation which, if all goes well, will become a “saviour sibling”, a brother or sister capable of donating life-saving tissue to an existing child. This paper addresses the question of whether this form of selection should be banned and concludes that it should not. Three main prohibitionist arguments are considered and found wanting: (a) the claim that saviour siblings would be treated as commodities; (b) a slippery slope argument, which suggests that this practice will lead to the creation of so-called “designer babies”; and (c) a child welfare argument, according to which saviour siblings will be physically and/or psychologically harmed. ",
author = "S. Sheldon and Stephen Wilkinson",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1136/jme.2003.004150",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "533--537",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should selecting saviour siblings be banned?

AU - Sheldon, S.

AU - Wilkinson, Stephen

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - By using tissue typing in conjunction with preimplantation genetic diagnosis doctors are able to pick a human embryo for implantation which, if all goes well, will become a “saviour sibling”, a brother or sister capable of donating life-saving tissue to an existing child. This paper addresses the question of whether this form of selection should be banned and concludes that it should not. Three main prohibitionist arguments are considered and found wanting: (a) the claim that saviour siblings would be treated as commodities; (b) a slippery slope argument, which suggests that this practice will lead to the creation of so-called “designer babies”; and (c) a child welfare argument, according to which saviour siblings will be physically and/or psychologically harmed.

AB - By using tissue typing in conjunction with preimplantation genetic diagnosis doctors are able to pick a human embryo for implantation which, if all goes well, will become a “saviour sibling”, a brother or sister capable of donating life-saving tissue to an existing child. This paper addresses the question of whether this form of selection should be banned and concludes that it should not. Three main prohibitionist arguments are considered and found wanting: (a) the claim that saviour siblings would be treated as commodities; (b) a slippery slope argument, which suggests that this practice will lead to the creation of so-called “designer babies”; and (c) a child welfare argument, according to which saviour siblings will be physically and/or psychologically harmed.

U2 - 10.1136/jme.2003.004150

DO - 10.1136/jme.2003.004150

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 533

EP - 537

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 6

ER -