Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Silent reading of direct versus indirect speech...
View graph of relations

Silent reading of direct versus indirect speech activates voice-selective areas in the auditory cortex

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Silent reading of direct versus indirect speech activates voice-selective areas in the auditory cortex. / Yao, B.; Belin, P.; Scheepers, C.
In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 23, No. 10, 31.10.2011, p. 3146–3152.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Yao, B, Belin, P & Scheepers, C 2011, 'Silent reading of direct versus indirect speech activates voice-selective areas in the auditory cortex', Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 3146–3152. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00022

APA

Vancouver

Yao B, Belin P, Scheepers C. Silent reading of direct versus indirect speech activates voice-selective areas in the auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2011 Oct 31;23(10):3146–3152. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00022

Author

Yao, B. ; Belin, P. ; Scheepers, C. / Silent reading of direct versus indirect speech activates voice-selective areas in the auditory cortex. In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2011 ; Vol. 23, No. 10. pp. 3146–3152.

Bibtex

@article{e48a70f96b274b6b9c8db26dd8fb0d7d,
title = "Silent reading of direct versus indirect speech activates voice-selective areas in the auditory cortex",
abstract = "In human communication, direct speech (e.g., Mary said: “I'm hungry”) is perceived to be more vivid than indirect speech (e.g., Mary said [that] she was hungry). However, for silent reading, the representational consequences of this distinction are still unclear. Although many of us share the intuition of an “inner voice,” particularly during silent reading of direct speech statements in text, there has been little direct empirical confirmation of this experience so far. Combining fMRI with eye tracking in human volunteers, we show that silent reading of direct versus indirect speech engenders differential brain activation in voice-selective areas of the auditory cortex. This suggests that readers are indeed more likely to engage in perceptual simulations (or spontaneous imagery) of the reported speaker's voice when reading direct speech as opposed to meaning-equivalent indirect speech statements as part of a more vivid representation of the former. Our results may be interpreted in line with embodied cognition and form a starting point for more sophisticated interdisciplinary research on the nature of auditory mental simulation during reading.",
author = "B. Yao and P. Belin and C. Scheepers",
year = "2011",
month = oct,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1162/jocn_a_00022",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "3146–3152",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience",
issn = "0898-929X",
publisher = "MIT Press",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Silent reading of direct versus indirect speech activates voice-selective areas in the auditory cortex

AU - Yao, B.

AU - Belin, P.

AU - Scheepers, C.

PY - 2011/10/31

Y1 - 2011/10/31

N2 - In human communication, direct speech (e.g., Mary said: “I'm hungry”) is perceived to be more vivid than indirect speech (e.g., Mary said [that] she was hungry). However, for silent reading, the representational consequences of this distinction are still unclear. Although many of us share the intuition of an “inner voice,” particularly during silent reading of direct speech statements in text, there has been little direct empirical confirmation of this experience so far. Combining fMRI with eye tracking in human volunteers, we show that silent reading of direct versus indirect speech engenders differential brain activation in voice-selective areas of the auditory cortex. This suggests that readers are indeed more likely to engage in perceptual simulations (or spontaneous imagery) of the reported speaker's voice when reading direct speech as opposed to meaning-equivalent indirect speech statements as part of a more vivid representation of the former. Our results may be interpreted in line with embodied cognition and form a starting point for more sophisticated interdisciplinary research on the nature of auditory mental simulation during reading.

AB - In human communication, direct speech (e.g., Mary said: “I'm hungry”) is perceived to be more vivid than indirect speech (e.g., Mary said [that] she was hungry). However, for silent reading, the representational consequences of this distinction are still unclear. Although many of us share the intuition of an “inner voice,” particularly during silent reading of direct speech statements in text, there has been little direct empirical confirmation of this experience so far. Combining fMRI with eye tracking in human volunteers, we show that silent reading of direct versus indirect speech engenders differential brain activation in voice-selective areas of the auditory cortex. This suggests that readers are indeed more likely to engage in perceptual simulations (or spontaneous imagery) of the reported speaker's voice when reading direct speech as opposed to meaning-equivalent indirect speech statements as part of a more vivid representation of the former. Our results may be interpreted in line with embodied cognition and form a starting point for more sophisticated interdisciplinary research on the nature of auditory mental simulation during reading.

U2 - 10.1162/jocn_a_00022

DO - 10.1162/jocn_a_00022

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 3146

EP - 3152

JO - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

SN - 0898-929X

IS - 10

ER -