Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Sluts that choose vs doormat gypsies

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Sluts that choose vs doormat gypsies: exploring affect in the postfeminist, visual moral economy of My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Sluts that choose vs doormat gypsies: exploring affect in the postfeminist, visual moral economy of My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding. / Jensen, Tracey Louisa; Ringrose, Jessica.
In: Feminist Media Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2014, p. 369-387.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Jensen TL, Ringrose J. Sluts that choose vs doormat gypsies: exploring affect in the postfeminist, visual moral economy of My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding. Feminist Media Studies. 2014;14(3):369-387. Epub 2013 Jan 25. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2012.756820

Author

Bibtex

@article{6e815d94d1514b4e83e9253d8598a92b,
title = "Sluts that choose vs doormat gypsies: exploring affect in the postfeminist, visual moral economy of My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding",
abstract = "The UK primetime series My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding (Channel 4, 2010, 2011, 2012) offered audiences the opportunity to be armchair matrimonial ethnographers, to reveal the courtship curiosities of “one of the most secretive communities in the UK.” In spite of claims to social realist documentary, however, we argue that this programme has clearer resonances with “sexpos{\'e}” reality television, producing and circulating a moral, visual economy premised upon the cultural figuration of “the gypsy bride.” The gypsy girl and gypsy bride are marked as victims of male gypsy oppression, of “backwards” and repressive cultural practices, of age-inappropriate sexualisation and “excessive” consumerism, and is thus defined by her failure to be a good aspirational postfeminist subject. In this paper, we explore the intersecting discourses around gender, sexuality, class, and race operative within Gypsy Wedding and analyse online forums responding to the programme. We use psychosocial methodologies and theories of affect to argue that the gypsy bride becomes a figure of abjection, desired and despised, and that the (readily accepted) invitation to be appalled by her “oppression” reveals the strategic potency of postfeminist notions of empowerment and the racist, sexist, and classist agendas it can serve.",
keywords = "reality television, Travellers, social class, whiteness, sexualisation, femininity, psychosocial methodology, online discussion forums",
author = "Jensen, {Tracey Louisa} and Jessica Ringrose",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/14680777.2012.756820",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "369--387",
journal = "Feminist Media Studies",
issn = "1468-0777",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sluts that choose vs doormat gypsies

T2 - exploring affect in the postfeminist, visual moral economy of My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding

AU - Jensen, Tracey Louisa

AU - Ringrose, Jessica

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The UK primetime series My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding (Channel 4, 2010, 2011, 2012) offered audiences the opportunity to be armchair matrimonial ethnographers, to reveal the courtship curiosities of “one of the most secretive communities in the UK.” In spite of claims to social realist documentary, however, we argue that this programme has clearer resonances with “sexposé” reality television, producing and circulating a moral, visual economy premised upon the cultural figuration of “the gypsy bride.” The gypsy girl and gypsy bride are marked as victims of male gypsy oppression, of “backwards” and repressive cultural practices, of age-inappropriate sexualisation and “excessive” consumerism, and is thus defined by her failure to be a good aspirational postfeminist subject. In this paper, we explore the intersecting discourses around gender, sexuality, class, and race operative within Gypsy Wedding and analyse online forums responding to the programme. We use psychosocial methodologies and theories of affect to argue that the gypsy bride becomes a figure of abjection, desired and despised, and that the (readily accepted) invitation to be appalled by her “oppression” reveals the strategic potency of postfeminist notions of empowerment and the racist, sexist, and classist agendas it can serve.

AB - The UK primetime series My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding (Channel 4, 2010, 2011, 2012) offered audiences the opportunity to be armchair matrimonial ethnographers, to reveal the courtship curiosities of “one of the most secretive communities in the UK.” In spite of claims to social realist documentary, however, we argue that this programme has clearer resonances with “sexposé” reality television, producing and circulating a moral, visual economy premised upon the cultural figuration of “the gypsy bride.” The gypsy girl and gypsy bride are marked as victims of male gypsy oppression, of “backwards” and repressive cultural practices, of age-inappropriate sexualisation and “excessive” consumerism, and is thus defined by her failure to be a good aspirational postfeminist subject. In this paper, we explore the intersecting discourses around gender, sexuality, class, and race operative within Gypsy Wedding and analyse online forums responding to the programme. We use psychosocial methodologies and theories of affect to argue that the gypsy bride becomes a figure of abjection, desired and despised, and that the (readily accepted) invitation to be appalled by her “oppression” reveals the strategic potency of postfeminist notions of empowerment and the racist, sexist, and classist agendas it can serve.

KW - reality television

KW - Travellers

KW - social class

KW - whiteness

KW - sexualisation

KW - femininity

KW - psychosocial methodology

KW - online discussion forums

U2 - 10.1080/14680777.2012.756820

DO - 10.1080/14680777.2012.756820

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

SP - 369

EP - 387

JO - Feminist Media Studies

JF - Feminist Media Studies

SN - 1468-0777

IS - 3

ER -