Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > So what do we really mean when we say that syst...

Electronic data

  • 1752-0509-4-22

    Rights statement: © 2010 Gatherer; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Final published version, 301 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

So what do we really mean when we say that systems biology is holistic?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

So what do we really mean when we say that systems biology is holistic? / Gatherer, Derek.

In: BMC Systems Biology, Vol. 4, 22, 12.03.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{20e8d6dceeb648f0a5974756396ca0ea,
title = "So what do we really mean when we say that systems biology is holistic?",
abstract = "Background: An old debate has undergone a resurgence in systems biology: that of reductionism versus holism. At least 35 articles in the systems biology literature since 2003 have touched on this issue. The histories of holism and reductionism in the philosophy of biology are reviewed, and the current debate in systems biology is placed in context.Results: Inter-theoretic reductionism in the strict sense envisaged by its creators from the 1930s to the 1960s is largely impractical in biology, and was effectively abandoned by the early 1970s in favour of a more piecemeal approach using individual reductive explanations. Classical holism was a stillborn theory of the 1920s, but the term survived in several fields as a loose umbrella designation for various kinds of anti-reductionism which often differ markedly. Several of these different anti-reductionisms are on display in the holistic rhetoric of the recent systems biology literature. This debate also coincides with a time when interesting arguments are being proposed within the philosophy of biology for a new kind of reductionism.Conclusions: Engaging more deeply with these issues should sharpen our ideas concerning the philosophy of systems biology and its future best methodology. As with previous decisive moments in the history of biology, only those theories that immediately suggest relatively easy experiments will be winners.",
keywords = "MOLECULAR-BIOLOGY, REDUCTIONISM, COMPLEXITY, METABOLOMICS, NETWORKS, MEDICINE, CONTEXT, LIMITS, WHOLE, TERMS",
author = "Derek Gatherer",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2010 Gatherer; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.",
year = "2010",
month = mar,
day = "12",
doi = "10.1186/1752-0509-4-22",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
journal = "BMC Systems Biology",
issn = "1752-0509",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - So what do we really mean when we say that systems biology is holistic?

AU - Gatherer, Derek

N1 - © 2010 Gatherer; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PY - 2010/3/12

Y1 - 2010/3/12

N2 - Background: An old debate has undergone a resurgence in systems biology: that of reductionism versus holism. At least 35 articles in the systems biology literature since 2003 have touched on this issue. The histories of holism and reductionism in the philosophy of biology are reviewed, and the current debate in systems biology is placed in context.Results: Inter-theoretic reductionism in the strict sense envisaged by its creators from the 1930s to the 1960s is largely impractical in biology, and was effectively abandoned by the early 1970s in favour of a more piecemeal approach using individual reductive explanations. Classical holism was a stillborn theory of the 1920s, but the term survived in several fields as a loose umbrella designation for various kinds of anti-reductionism which often differ markedly. Several of these different anti-reductionisms are on display in the holistic rhetoric of the recent systems biology literature. This debate also coincides with a time when interesting arguments are being proposed within the philosophy of biology for a new kind of reductionism.Conclusions: Engaging more deeply with these issues should sharpen our ideas concerning the philosophy of systems biology and its future best methodology. As with previous decisive moments in the history of biology, only those theories that immediately suggest relatively easy experiments will be winners.

AB - Background: An old debate has undergone a resurgence in systems biology: that of reductionism versus holism. At least 35 articles in the systems biology literature since 2003 have touched on this issue. The histories of holism and reductionism in the philosophy of biology are reviewed, and the current debate in systems biology is placed in context.Results: Inter-theoretic reductionism in the strict sense envisaged by its creators from the 1930s to the 1960s is largely impractical in biology, and was effectively abandoned by the early 1970s in favour of a more piecemeal approach using individual reductive explanations. Classical holism was a stillborn theory of the 1920s, but the term survived in several fields as a loose umbrella designation for various kinds of anti-reductionism which often differ markedly. Several of these different anti-reductionisms are on display in the holistic rhetoric of the recent systems biology literature. This debate also coincides with a time when interesting arguments are being proposed within the philosophy of biology for a new kind of reductionism.Conclusions: Engaging more deeply with these issues should sharpen our ideas concerning the philosophy of systems biology and its future best methodology. As with previous decisive moments in the history of biology, only those theories that immediately suggest relatively easy experiments will be winners.

KW - MOLECULAR-BIOLOGY

KW - REDUCTIONISM

KW - COMPLEXITY

KW - METABOLOMICS

KW - NETWORKS

KW - MEDICINE

KW - CONTEXT

KW - LIMITS

KW - WHOLE

KW - TERMS

U2 - 10.1186/1752-0509-4-22

DO - 10.1186/1752-0509-4-22

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

JO - BMC Systems Biology

JF - BMC Systems Biology

SN - 1752-0509

M1 - 22

ER -