Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Social imaginaries, structuration, learning, an...

Research

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

Keywords

View graph of relations

Social imaginaries, structuration, learning, and collibration: their role and limitations in governing complexity

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Social imaginaries, structuration, learning, and collibration: their role and limitations in governing complexity. / Jessop, Bob.
In: Zarządzanie Publiczne, No. 19, 11.2012, p. 71-83.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Jessop, B 2012, 'Social imaginaries, structuration, learning, and collibration: their role and limitations in governing complexity', Zarządzanie Publiczne, no. 19, pp. 71-83.

APA

Jessop, B. (2012). Social imaginaries, structuration, learning, and collibration: their role and limitations in governing complexity. Zarządzanie Publiczne, (19), 71-83.

Vancouver

Jessop B. Social imaginaries, structuration, learning, and collibration: their role and limitations in governing complexity. Zarządzanie Publiczne. 2012 Nov;(19):71-83.

Author

Jessop, Bob. / Social imaginaries, structuration, learning, and collibration : their role and limitations in governing complexity. In: Zarządzanie Publiczne. 2012 ; No. 19. pp. 71-83.

Bibtex

@article{2c10cea850d84993bc881b94bbdf1962,
title = "Social imaginaries, structuration, learning, and collibration: their role and limitations in governing complexity",
abstract = "My contribution to this special issue of Zarz{\c a}dzanie Publiczne (Public Governance) undertakes five tasks: (1) present the key concepts for an analysis of complexity and its reduction through semiosis and structuration; (2) elaborate the notions of lived experience (tied to personal identity or consciousness), social imaginary, and ideology (which involves more than social imaginaries); (3) introduce the key concepts for the study of structuration, including spatio-temporal fix, structural coupling, and ecological dominance; (4) introduce the notion of learning as a crucial mediation between lived experience and social structuration; and (5) show how different forms of coordination of complex interdependence have developed to address these problems, how they fail, and how individual and social agents seek to address governance failure through new forms of imaginary and new efforts at collibration. My contribution ends with some remarks on a research agenda based on these arguments and a practical agenda oriented to better governance based on {\textquoteleft}romantic public irony{\textquoteright} as a way of {\textquoteleft}going on{\textquoteright} in a deeply complex world.",
keywords = "collibration, governance, complexity, deep complexity, meta-governance, compossibility, semiosis, cultural political economy",
author = "Bob Jessop",
year = "2012",
month = nov,
language = "English",
pages = "71--83",
journal = "Zarz{\c a}dzanie Publiczne",
number = "19",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social imaginaries, structuration, learning, and collibration

T2 - their role and limitations in governing complexity

AU - Jessop, Bob

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - My contribution to this special issue of Zarządzanie Publiczne (Public Governance) undertakes five tasks: (1) present the key concepts for an analysis of complexity and its reduction through semiosis and structuration; (2) elaborate the notions of lived experience (tied to personal identity or consciousness), social imaginary, and ideology (which involves more than social imaginaries); (3) introduce the key concepts for the study of structuration, including spatio-temporal fix, structural coupling, and ecological dominance; (4) introduce the notion of learning as a crucial mediation between lived experience and social structuration; and (5) show how different forms of coordination of complex interdependence have developed to address these problems, how they fail, and how individual and social agents seek to address governance failure through new forms of imaginary and new efforts at collibration. My contribution ends with some remarks on a research agenda based on these arguments and a practical agenda oriented to better governance based on ‘romantic public irony’ as a way of ‘going on’ in a deeply complex world.

AB - My contribution to this special issue of Zarządzanie Publiczne (Public Governance) undertakes five tasks: (1) present the key concepts for an analysis of complexity and its reduction through semiosis and structuration; (2) elaborate the notions of lived experience (tied to personal identity or consciousness), social imaginary, and ideology (which involves more than social imaginaries); (3) introduce the key concepts for the study of structuration, including spatio-temporal fix, structural coupling, and ecological dominance; (4) introduce the notion of learning as a crucial mediation between lived experience and social structuration; and (5) show how different forms of coordination of complex interdependence have developed to address these problems, how they fail, and how individual and social agents seek to address governance failure through new forms of imaginary and new efforts at collibration. My contribution ends with some remarks on a research agenda based on these arguments and a practical agenda oriented to better governance based on ‘romantic public irony’ as a way of ‘going on’ in a deeply complex world.

KW - collibration

KW - governance

KW - complexity

KW - deep complexity

KW - meta-governance

KW - compossibility

KW - semiosis

KW - cultural political economy

M3 - Journal article

SP - 71

EP - 83

JO - Zarządzanie Publiczne

JF - Zarządzanie Publiczne

IS - 19

ER -