Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Social Science Sequestered

Research

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Social Science Sequestered

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Social Science Sequestered. / Markusson, Nils; Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye; Chilvers, Jason et al.
In: Frontiers in Climate, Vol. 2, 2, 02.06.2020, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Markusson, N, Balta-Ozkan, N, Chilvers, J, Healey, P, Reiner, D & McLaren, D 2020, 'Social Science Sequestered', Frontiers in Climate, vol. 2, 2, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2020.00002

APA

Markusson, N., Balta-Ozkan, N., Chilvers, J., Healey, P., Reiner, D., & McLaren, D. (2020). Social Science Sequestered. Frontiers in Climate, 2, 1-6. Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2020.00002

Vancouver

Markusson N, Balta-Ozkan N, Chilvers J, Healey P, Reiner D, McLaren D. Social Science Sequestered. Frontiers in Climate. 2020 Jun 2;2:1-6. 2. doi: 10.3389/fclim.2020.00002

Author

Markusson, Nils ; Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye ; Chilvers, Jason et al. / Social Science Sequestered. In: Frontiers in Climate. 2020 ; Vol. 2. pp. 1-6.

Bibtex

@article{7772dc73567d4fdb8bce689554e33044,
title = "Social Science Sequestered",
abstract = "Greenhouse gas removal (GGR) raises many cultural, ethical, legal, social, and political issues, yet in the growing area of GGR research, humanities and social sciences (HASS) research is often marginalized, constrained and depoliticised. This global dynamic is illustrated by an analysis of the UK GGR research programme. This dynamic matters for the knowledge produced and for its users. Without HASS contributions, too narrow a range of perspectives, futures and issues will be considered, undermining or overpromising the prospects for the responsible development of GGR (and threatening worse side-effects), and limiting our understanding of why and how policy demands GGR solutions in the first place. In response, we present policy principles for bringing HASS fully into GGR research, organized around three themes: (1) HASS-led GGR research, (2) Opening up GGR futures, and (3) The politics of GGR futures.",
keywords = "humanities and social sciences, GGR research, marginalized, constrained, depoliticised, UK GGR programme, research policy principles",
author = "Nils Markusson and Nazmiye Balta-Ozkan and Jason Chilvers and Peter Healey and David Reiner and Duncan McLaren",
year = "2020",
month = jun,
day = "2",
doi = "10.3389/fclim.2020.00002",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Frontiers in Climate",
issn = "2624-9553",
publisher = "Frontiers Media",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Science Sequestered

AU - Markusson, Nils

AU - Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye

AU - Chilvers, Jason

AU - Healey, Peter

AU - Reiner, David

AU - McLaren, Duncan

PY - 2020/6/2

Y1 - 2020/6/2

N2 - Greenhouse gas removal (GGR) raises many cultural, ethical, legal, social, and political issues, yet in the growing area of GGR research, humanities and social sciences (HASS) research is often marginalized, constrained and depoliticised. This global dynamic is illustrated by an analysis of the UK GGR research programme. This dynamic matters for the knowledge produced and for its users. Without HASS contributions, too narrow a range of perspectives, futures and issues will be considered, undermining or overpromising the prospects for the responsible development of GGR (and threatening worse side-effects), and limiting our understanding of why and how policy demands GGR solutions in the first place. In response, we present policy principles for bringing HASS fully into GGR research, organized around three themes: (1) HASS-led GGR research, (2) Opening up GGR futures, and (3) The politics of GGR futures.

AB - Greenhouse gas removal (GGR) raises many cultural, ethical, legal, social, and political issues, yet in the growing area of GGR research, humanities and social sciences (HASS) research is often marginalized, constrained and depoliticised. This global dynamic is illustrated by an analysis of the UK GGR research programme. This dynamic matters for the knowledge produced and for its users. Without HASS contributions, too narrow a range of perspectives, futures and issues will be considered, undermining or overpromising the prospects for the responsible development of GGR (and threatening worse side-effects), and limiting our understanding of why and how policy demands GGR solutions in the first place. In response, we present policy principles for bringing HASS fully into GGR research, organized around three themes: (1) HASS-led GGR research, (2) Opening up GGR futures, and (3) The politics of GGR futures.

KW - humanities and social sciences

KW - GGR research

KW - marginalized

KW - constrained

KW - depoliticised

KW - UK GGR programme

KW - research policy principles

U2 - 10.3389/fclim.2020.00002

DO - 10.3389/fclim.2020.00002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Frontiers in Climate

JF - Frontiers in Climate

SN - 2624-9553

M1 - 2

ER -