Rights statement: ©Andrew Lustig, Gavin Brookes, Daniel Hunt. Final published version Lustig A, Brookes G, Hunt D Social Semiotics of Gangstalking Evidence Videos on YouTube: Multimodal Discourse Analysis of a Novel Persecutory Belief System JMIR Ment Health 2021;8(10):e30311doi: 10.2196/30311 is available in JMIR Mental Health https://mental.jmir.org/2021/10/e30311/
Accepted author manuscript, 1.03 MB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Social Semiotics of Gangstalking Evidence Videos on YouTube
T2 - Multimodal Discourse Analysis of a Novel Persecutory Belief System
AU - Lustig, Andrew
AU - Brookes, Gavin
AU - Hunt, Daniel
N1 - ©Andrew Lustig, Gavin Brookes, Daniel Hunt. Final published version Lustig A, Brookes G, Hunt D Social Semiotics of Gangstalking Evidence Videos on YouTube: Multimodal Discourse Analysis of a Novel Persecutory Belief System JMIR Ment Health 2021;8(10):e30311doi: 10.2196/30311 is available in JMIR Mental Health https://mental.jmir.org/2021/10/e30311/
PY - 2021/10/31
Y1 - 2021/10/31
N2 - Background: Gangstalking refers to a novel persecutory belief system wherein sufferers believe that they are being followed,watched, and harassed by a vast network of people in their community who have been recruited as complicit perpetrators. Theyare frequently diagnosed as mentally ill, although they reject this formulation. Those affected by this belief system self-identifyas targeted individuals (TIs). They seek to prove the veracity of their persecution and dispute the notion that they are mentallyill by posting videos online that purport to provide evidence of their claims.Objective: The objective of the study was to characterize the multimodal social semiotic practices used in gangstalking evidencevideos.Methods: We assembled a group of 50 evidence videos posted on YouTube by self-identified TIs and performed a multimodalsocial semiotic discourse analysis using a grounded theory approach to data analysis.Results: TIs accomplished several social and interpersonal tasks in the videos. They constructed their own identity as subjectsof persecution and refuted the notion that they suffered from mental illness. They also cultivated positive ambient affiliation withviewers of the videos but manifested hostility toward people who appeared in the videos. They made extensive use of multimodaldeixis to generate salience and construe the gangstalking belief system. The act of filming itself was a source of conflict andserved as a self-fulfilling prophecy; filming was undertaken to neutrally record hostility directed toward video bloggers (vloggers).However, the act of filming precipitated the very behaviors that they set out to document. Finally, the act of filming was alsoregarded as an act of resistance and empowerment by vloggers.Conclusions: These data provide insight into a novel persecutory belief system. Interpersonal concerns are important for peopleaffected, and they construe others as either sympathetic or hostile. They create positive ambient affiliation with viewers. Wefound that vloggers use multimodal deixis to illustrate the salience of the belief system. The videos highlighted the Derrideanconcept of différance, wherein the meaning of polysemous signifiers is deferred without definitive resolution. This may beimportant in communicating with people and patients with persecutory belief systems. Clinicians may consider stepping awayfrom the traditional true/false dichotomy endorsed by psychiatric classification systems and focus on the ambiguity in semioticsystems generally and in persecutory belief systems specifically.
AB - Background: Gangstalking refers to a novel persecutory belief system wherein sufferers believe that they are being followed,watched, and harassed by a vast network of people in their community who have been recruited as complicit perpetrators. Theyare frequently diagnosed as mentally ill, although they reject this formulation. Those affected by this belief system self-identifyas targeted individuals (TIs). They seek to prove the veracity of their persecution and dispute the notion that they are mentallyill by posting videos online that purport to provide evidence of their claims.Objective: The objective of the study was to characterize the multimodal social semiotic practices used in gangstalking evidencevideos.Methods: We assembled a group of 50 evidence videos posted on YouTube by self-identified TIs and performed a multimodalsocial semiotic discourse analysis using a grounded theory approach to data analysis.Results: TIs accomplished several social and interpersonal tasks in the videos. They constructed their own identity as subjectsof persecution and refuted the notion that they suffered from mental illness. They also cultivated positive ambient affiliation withviewers of the videos but manifested hostility toward people who appeared in the videos. They made extensive use of multimodaldeixis to generate salience and construe the gangstalking belief system. The act of filming itself was a source of conflict andserved as a self-fulfilling prophecy; filming was undertaken to neutrally record hostility directed toward video bloggers (vloggers).However, the act of filming precipitated the very behaviors that they set out to document. Finally, the act of filming was alsoregarded as an act of resistance and empowerment by vloggers.Conclusions: These data provide insight into a novel persecutory belief system. Interpersonal concerns are important for peopleaffected, and they construe others as either sympathetic or hostile. They create positive ambient affiliation with viewers. Wefound that vloggers use multimodal deixis to illustrate the salience of the belief system. The videos highlighted the Derrideanconcept of différance, wherein the meaning of polysemous signifiers is deferred without definitive resolution. This may beimportant in communicating with people and patients with persecutory belief systems. Clinicians may consider stepping awayfrom the traditional true/false dichotomy endorsed by psychiatric classification systems and focus on the ambiguity in semioticsystems generally and in persecutory belief systems specifically.
KW - internet
KW - discourse analysis
KW - psychosis
KW - delusion
KW - semiotics
KW - linguistics
KW - computer-mediated communication
KW - schizophrenia
KW - eHealth
KW - video
KW - communication
KW - YouTube
KW - social media
KW - discourse
KW - mental health
U2 - 10.2196/30311
DO - 10.2196/30311
M3 - Journal article
VL - 8
JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research
JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research
SN - 1439-4456
IS - 10
M1 - 230311
ER -