Rights statement: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics/article/sociophonetic-variation-of-like-in-british-dialects-effects-of-function-context-and-predictability-1/0EFFDF327F80E05BA7B79279627C8740 The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, English Language and Linguistics, 22 (1), pp 35-75 2018, © 2016 Cambridge University Press.
Other version, 1.48 MB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Sociophonetic variation of like in British dialects
T2 - Effects of function, context and predictability
AU - Schleef, Erik
AU - Turton, Danielle
N1 - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics/article/sociophonetic-variation-of-like-in-british-dialects-effects-of-function-context-and-predictability-1/0EFFDF327F80E05BA7B79279627C8740 The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, English Language and Linguistics, 22 (1), pp 35-75 2018, © 2016 Cambridge University Press.
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - This study examines sociophonetic variation in different functions of like among adolescents in London and Edinburgh. It attempts to determine the factors that may explain this variation. Our results suggest that the function of like correlates primarily with contextual factors, rather than the phonetic factors of vowel quality, /l/ to vowel duration and /k/ realisation. In particular, the preceding and following segments and their bigram predictability emerge as highly significant, in addition to the boundary strength following like. In both London and Edinburgh, the vowel appears to be the only non-contextual feature that is sensitive to the function of like: quotative be like is more likely to be monophthongised than other functions of like. We argue that the more monophthongal nature of quotative like is due to the syntactic and prosodic context in which it occurs.
AB - This study examines sociophonetic variation in different functions of like among adolescents in London and Edinburgh. It attempts to determine the factors that may explain this variation. Our results suggest that the function of like correlates primarily with contextual factors, rather than the phonetic factors of vowel quality, /l/ to vowel duration and /k/ realisation. In particular, the preceding and following segments and their bigram predictability emerge as highly significant, in addition to the boundary strength following like. In both London and Edinburgh, the vowel appears to be the only non-contextual feature that is sensitive to the function of like: quotative be like is more likely to be monophthongised than other functions of like. We argue that the more monophthongal nature of quotative like is due to the syntactic and prosodic context in which it occurs.
U2 - 10.1017/S136067431600023X
DO - 10.1017/S136067431600023X
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:84988375026
VL - 22
SP - 35
EP - 75
JO - English Language and Linguistics
JF - English Language and Linguistics
SN - 1360-6743
IS - 1
ER -