Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Sodium-Ion Batteries

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Sodium-Ion Batteries: Current Understanding of the Sodium Storage Mechanism in Hard Carbons

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Sodium-Ion Batteries: Current Understanding of the Sodium Storage Mechanism in Hard Carbons. / Fitzpatrick, Jack; Rodrigues Costa, Sara; Tapia-Ruiz, Nuria.
In: Johnson Matthey Technology Review, Vol. 66, No. 1, 01.01.2022, p. 44-60.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Fitzpatrick J, Rodrigues Costa S, Tapia-Ruiz N. Sodium-Ion Batteries: Current Understanding of the Sodium Storage Mechanism in Hard Carbons. Johnson Matthey Technology Review. 2022 Jan 1;66(1):44-60. Epub 2021 Jun 29. doi: 10.1595/205651322X16250408525547

Author

Bibtex

@article{6205e7efc5cf48048a8d40957c4ddbad,
title = "Sodium-Ion Batteries: Current Understanding of the Sodium Storage Mechanism in Hard Carbons",
abstract = "In recent years, sodium-ion batteries (NIBs) have been greatly explored as an alternative technology to lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) due to their cost-effectiveness and promise in mitigating the energy crisis we currently face. Similarities between both battery systems have enabled a fast development of NIBs, however, their full commercialisation has been delayed due to the lack of an appropriate anode material. Hard carbons (HCs) arise as one of the most promising materials and are already used in the first generation of commercial NIBs. Although promising, HCs exhibit lower performance compared to commercial graphite used as an anode in LIBs in terms of reversible specific capacity, operating voltage, initial coulombic efficiency and cycling stability. Nevertheless, these properties vary greatly depending on the HC in question e.g. surface area, porosity, degree of graphitisation, defect amount, etc., which in turn are dependent on the synthesis method and precursor used. Optimisation of these properties will bring forward the widespread commercialisation of NIBs at a competitive level with current LIBs. This review aims to provide a brief overview of the current understanding of the underlying reaction mechanisms occurring in the state-of-the-art HC anode material as well as their structure-property interdependence. We expect to bring new insights into the engineering of HC materials to achieve optimal, or at least, comparable electrochemical performance to that of graphite in LIBs.",
author = "Jack Fitzpatrick and {Rodrigues Costa}, Sara and Nuria Tapia-Ruiz",
year = "2022",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1595/205651322X16250408525547",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "44--60",
journal = "Johnson Matthey Technology Review",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sodium-Ion Batteries

T2 - Current Understanding of the Sodium Storage Mechanism in Hard Carbons

AU - Fitzpatrick, Jack

AU - Rodrigues Costa, Sara

AU - Tapia-Ruiz, Nuria

PY - 2022/1/1

Y1 - 2022/1/1

N2 - In recent years, sodium-ion batteries (NIBs) have been greatly explored as an alternative technology to lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) due to their cost-effectiveness and promise in mitigating the energy crisis we currently face. Similarities between both battery systems have enabled a fast development of NIBs, however, their full commercialisation has been delayed due to the lack of an appropriate anode material. Hard carbons (HCs) arise as one of the most promising materials and are already used in the first generation of commercial NIBs. Although promising, HCs exhibit lower performance compared to commercial graphite used as an anode in LIBs in terms of reversible specific capacity, operating voltage, initial coulombic efficiency and cycling stability. Nevertheless, these properties vary greatly depending on the HC in question e.g. surface area, porosity, degree of graphitisation, defect amount, etc., which in turn are dependent on the synthesis method and precursor used. Optimisation of these properties will bring forward the widespread commercialisation of NIBs at a competitive level with current LIBs. This review aims to provide a brief overview of the current understanding of the underlying reaction mechanisms occurring in the state-of-the-art HC anode material as well as their structure-property interdependence. We expect to bring new insights into the engineering of HC materials to achieve optimal, or at least, comparable electrochemical performance to that of graphite in LIBs.

AB - In recent years, sodium-ion batteries (NIBs) have been greatly explored as an alternative technology to lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) due to their cost-effectiveness and promise in mitigating the energy crisis we currently face. Similarities between both battery systems have enabled a fast development of NIBs, however, their full commercialisation has been delayed due to the lack of an appropriate anode material. Hard carbons (HCs) arise as one of the most promising materials and are already used in the first generation of commercial NIBs. Although promising, HCs exhibit lower performance compared to commercial graphite used as an anode in LIBs in terms of reversible specific capacity, operating voltage, initial coulombic efficiency and cycling stability. Nevertheless, these properties vary greatly depending on the HC in question e.g. surface area, porosity, degree of graphitisation, defect amount, etc., which in turn are dependent on the synthesis method and precursor used. Optimisation of these properties will bring forward the widespread commercialisation of NIBs at a competitive level with current LIBs. This review aims to provide a brief overview of the current understanding of the underlying reaction mechanisms occurring in the state-of-the-art HC anode material as well as their structure-property interdependence. We expect to bring new insights into the engineering of HC materials to achieve optimal, or at least, comparable electrochemical performance to that of graphite in LIBs.

U2 - 10.1595/205651322X16250408525547

DO - 10.1595/205651322X16250408525547

M3 - Journal article

VL - 66

SP - 44

EP - 60

JO - Johnson Matthey Technology Review

JF - Johnson Matthey Technology Review

IS - 1

ER -