Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Staff: staff and staff: client reliability of t...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Staff: staff and staff: client reliability of the Schalock and Keith (1993): quality of life questionnaire.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Staff: staff and staff: client reliability of the Schalock and Keith (1993): quality of life questionnaire. / Rapley, M.; Ridgway, J.; Beyer, S.
In: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Vol. 42, No. 1, 02.1998, p. 37-43.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Rapley, M, Ridgway, J & Beyer, S 1998, 'Staff: staff and staff: client reliability of the Schalock and Keith (1993): quality of life questionnaire.', Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00066.x

APA

Rapley, M., Ridgway, J., & Beyer, S. (1998). Staff: staff and staff: client reliability of the Schalock and Keith (1993): quality of life questionnaire. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 42(1), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00066.x

Vancouver

Rapley M, Ridgway J, Beyer S. Staff: staff and staff: client reliability of the Schalock and Keith (1993): quality of life questionnaire. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 1998 Feb;42(1):37-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00066.x

Author

Rapley, M. ; Ridgway, J. ; Beyer, S. / Staff: staff and staff: client reliability of the Schalock and Keith (1993): quality of life questionnaire. In: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 1998 ; Vol. 42, No. 1. pp. 37-43.

Bibtex

@article{7b63b506de7c4ab9a910dcb1d6a09e7c,
title = "Staff: staff and staff: client reliability of the Schalock and Keith (1993): quality of life questionnaire.",
abstract = "A small-scale study of the inter-rater and staff:client reliability of the Schalock & Keith (1993) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QOL-Q) was conducted. Whilst the sample size was small and the QOL-Q achieved an acceptable overall level of reliability, the study replicated the pattern of low staff:client concordance and staff overestimation of the independence and autonomy of clients reported by Reiter & Bendov (1996). The results are briefly discussed in the context of the ongoing debate about the utility of proxy response in the literature.",
keywords = "quality of life • service evaluation • inter-rater reliability • mental retardation",
author = "M. Rapley and J. Ridgway and S. Beyer",
year = "1998",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00066.x",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "37--43",
journal = "Journal of Intellectual Disability Research",
issn = "0964-2633",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Staff: staff and staff: client reliability of the Schalock and Keith (1993): quality of life questionnaire.

AU - Rapley, M.

AU - Ridgway, J.

AU - Beyer, S.

PY - 1998/2

Y1 - 1998/2

N2 - A small-scale study of the inter-rater and staff:client reliability of the Schalock & Keith (1993) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QOL-Q) was conducted. Whilst the sample size was small and the QOL-Q achieved an acceptable overall level of reliability, the study replicated the pattern of low staff:client concordance and staff overestimation of the independence and autonomy of clients reported by Reiter & Bendov (1996). The results are briefly discussed in the context of the ongoing debate about the utility of proxy response in the literature.

AB - A small-scale study of the inter-rater and staff:client reliability of the Schalock & Keith (1993) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QOL-Q) was conducted. Whilst the sample size was small and the QOL-Q achieved an acceptable overall level of reliability, the study replicated the pattern of low staff:client concordance and staff overestimation of the independence and autonomy of clients reported by Reiter & Bendov (1996). The results are briefly discussed in the context of the ongoing debate about the utility of proxy response in the literature.

KW - quality of life • service evaluation • inter-rater reliability • mental retardation

U2 - 10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00066.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00066.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 42

SP - 37

EP - 43

JO - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

JF - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

SN - 0964-2633

IS - 1

ER -