Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Stance-taking and public discussion in blogs.
View graph of relations

Stance-taking and public discussion in blogs.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Stance-taking and public discussion in blogs. / Myers, Greg.
In: Critical Discourse Studies, Vol. 7, No. 4, 11.2010, p. 263-275.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Myers, G 2010, 'Stance-taking and public discussion in blogs.', Critical Discourse Studies, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 263-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2010.511832

APA

Vancouver

Myers G. Stance-taking and public discussion in blogs. Critical Discourse Studies. 2010 Nov;7(4):263-275. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2010.511832

Author

Myers, Greg. / Stance-taking and public discussion in blogs. In: Critical Discourse Studies. 2010 ; Vol. 7, No. 4. pp. 263-275.

Bibtex

@article{b3830f559b4a4e93a02d695d9e868c54,
title = "Stance-taking and public discussion in blogs.",
abstract = "Blogs, which can be written and read by anyone with a computer and an internet connection, would seem to expand the possibilities for engagement in public sphere debates. Indeed, blogs are full of the kind of vocabulary that suggests intense discussion. However, a closer look at the way this vocabulary is used in context suggests that the main concern of writers is selfpresentation, positioning themselves in a crowded forum, in what has been called stancetaking. When writers mark their stances, for instance by saying I think, they enact different ways of signalling a relation to others, marking disagreement, enacting surprise, andironicising previous contributions. All these moves are ways of presenting one{\textquoteright}s own contribution as distinctive, showing one{\textquoteright}s entitlement to a position. In this paper, I use concordance tools to identify strings that are very frequent in a corpus of blogs, relative to a general corpus of written texts, focus on those relatively frequent words that mark stance and analyse these markers in context. I argue that the prominence of stance-taking indicates the priority of individual positioning over collective and deliberative discussion.",
keywords = "discourse, blogs, stance, public sphere, irony",
author = "Greg Myers",
year = "2010",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1080/17405904.2010.511832",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "263--275",
journal = "Critical Discourse Studies",
issn = "1740-5904",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stance-taking and public discussion in blogs.

AU - Myers, Greg

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - Blogs, which can be written and read by anyone with a computer and an internet connection, would seem to expand the possibilities for engagement in public sphere debates. Indeed, blogs are full of the kind of vocabulary that suggests intense discussion. However, a closer look at the way this vocabulary is used in context suggests that the main concern of writers is selfpresentation, positioning themselves in a crowded forum, in what has been called stancetaking. When writers mark their stances, for instance by saying I think, they enact different ways of signalling a relation to others, marking disagreement, enacting surprise, andironicising previous contributions. All these moves are ways of presenting one’s own contribution as distinctive, showing one’s entitlement to a position. In this paper, I use concordance tools to identify strings that are very frequent in a corpus of blogs, relative to a general corpus of written texts, focus on those relatively frequent words that mark stance and analyse these markers in context. I argue that the prominence of stance-taking indicates the priority of individual positioning over collective and deliberative discussion.

AB - Blogs, which can be written and read by anyone with a computer and an internet connection, would seem to expand the possibilities for engagement in public sphere debates. Indeed, blogs are full of the kind of vocabulary that suggests intense discussion. However, a closer look at the way this vocabulary is used in context suggests that the main concern of writers is selfpresentation, positioning themselves in a crowded forum, in what has been called stancetaking. When writers mark their stances, for instance by saying I think, they enact different ways of signalling a relation to others, marking disagreement, enacting surprise, andironicising previous contributions. All these moves are ways of presenting one’s own contribution as distinctive, showing one’s entitlement to a position. In this paper, I use concordance tools to identify strings that are very frequent in a corpus of blogs, relative to a general corpus of written texts, focus on those relatively frequent words that mark stance and analyse these markers in context. I argue that the prominence of stance-taking indicates the priority of individual positioning over collective and deliberative discussion.

KW - discourse

KW - blogs

KW - stance

KW - public sphere

KW - irony

U2 - 10.1080/17405904.2010.511832

DO - 10.1080/17405904.2010.511832

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

SP - 263

EP - 275

JO - Critical Discourse Studies

JF - Critical Discourse Studies

SN - 1740-5904

IS - 4

ER -