Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • Hilary Pinnock
  • Melanie Barwick
  • Christopher R. Carpenter
  • Sandra Eldridge
  • Gonzalo Grandes
  • Chris J. Griffiths
  • Joanne Rycroft-Malone
  • Paul Meissner
  • Elizabeth Murray
  • Anita Patel
  • Aziz Sheikh
  • Stephanie J. C. Taylor
Close
Article numberi6795
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>31/10/2017
<mark>Journal</mark>BMJ
Issue number356
Volume2017
Number of pages9
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Implementation studies are often poorly reported and indexed, reducing their potential to inform initiatives to improve healthcare services. The Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) initiative aimed to develop guidelines for transparent and accurate reporting of implementation studies. Informed by the findings of a systematic review and a consensus-building e-Delphi exercise, an international working group of implementation science experts discussed and agreed the StaRI Checklist comprising 27 items. It prompts researchers to describe both the implementation strategy (techniques used to promote implementation of an underused evidence-based intervention) and the effectiveness of the intervention that was being implemented. An accompanying Explanation and Elaboration document (published in BMJ Open, doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013318) details each of the items, explains the rationale, and provides examples of good reporting practice. Adoption of StaRI will improve the reporting of implementation studies, potentially facilitating translation of research into practice and improving the health of individuals and populations.

Bibliographic note

M1 - i6795