Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Statement on the FERA guidance proposal

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Statement on the FERA guidance proposal: ‘Guidance on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments’ (FERA, 2012)

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Statement on the FERA guidance proposal: ‘Guidance on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments’ (FERA, 2012). / EFSA PPR Panel.
In: EFSA Journal, Vol. 13, No. 7, 4175, 13.07.2015.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

EFSA PPR Panel 2015, 'Statement on the FERA guidance proposal: ‘Guidance on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments’ (FERA, 2012)', EFSA Journal, vol. 13, no. 7, 4175. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4175

APA

EFSA PPR Panel (2015). Statement on the FERA guidance proposal: ‘Guidance on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments’ (FERA, 2012). EFSA Journal, 13(7), Article 4175. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4175

Vancouver

EFSA PPR Panel. Statement on the FERA guidance proposal: ‘Guidance on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments’ (FERA, 2012). EFSA Journal. 2015 Jul 13;13(7):4175. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4175

Author

EFSA PPR Panel. / Statement on the FERA guidance proposal : ‘Guidance on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments’ (FERA, 2012). In: EFSA Journal. 2015 ; Vol. 13, No. 7.

Bibtex

@article{f34326a5651f48a2ac4f4d767a835869,
title = "Statement on the FERA guidance proposal: {\textquoteleft}Guidance on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments{\textquoteright} (FERA, 2012)",
abstract = "The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) asked the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues to prepare a scientific opinion on the Food and Environment Research Agency guidance proposal “Guidance on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments”. The Panel concluded that the experimental and modelling approaches described in the proposed guidance are reasonable compromises between the required effort and what is desirable from a theoretical point of view. However, the Panel has concerns about the interpretation of the experiments and how the results of the experiments should be used in the leaching assessment. The Panel investigated options for improvement, but could not complete its evaluation on these two topics because underlying data to test these options were not made available to the Panel. For this reason, the Panel prepared a statement instead of a scientific opinion. Therefore, the Panel cannot recommend the use of the guidance for the time being.",
author = "Ockleford, {Colin Douglas} and {EFSA PPR Panel}",
year = "2015",
month = jul,
day = "13",
doi = "10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4175",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "EFSA Journal",
issn = "1831-4732",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statement on the FERA guidance proposal

T2 - ‘Guidance on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments’ (FERA, 2012)

AU - Ockleford, Colin Douglas

AU - EFSA PPR Panel

PY - 2015/7/13

Y1 - 2015/7/13

N2 - The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) asked the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues to prepare a scientific opinion on the Food and Environment Research Agency guidance proposal “Guidance on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments”. The Panel concluded that the experimental and modelling approaches described in the proposed guidance are reasonable compromises between the required effort and what is desirable from a theoretical point of view. However, the Panel has concerns about the interpretation of the experiments and how the results of the experiments should be used in the leaching assessment. The Panel investigated options for improvement, but could not complete its evaluation on these two topics because underlying data to test these options were not made available to the Panel. For this reason, the Panel prepared a statement instead of a scientific opinion. Therefore, the Panel cannot recommend the use of the guidance for the time being.

AB - The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) asked the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues to prepare a scientific opinion on the Food and Environment Research Agency guidance proposal “Guidance on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments”. The Panel concluded that the experimental and modelling approaches described in the proposed guidance are reasonable compromises between the required effort and what is desirable from a theoretical point of view. However, the Panel has concerns about the interpretation of the experiments and how the results of the experiments should be used in the leaching assessment. The Panel investigated options for improvement, but could not complete its evaluation on these two topics because underlying data to test these options were not made available to the Panel. For this reason, the Panel prepared a statement instead of a scientific opinion. Therefore, the Panel cannot recommend the use of the guidance for the time being.

U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4175

DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4175

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

JO - EFSA Journal

JF - EFSA Journal

SN - 1831-4732

IS - 7

M1 - 4175

ER -