Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN › Conference paper › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN › Conference paper › peer-review
}
TY - CONF
T1 - Status of the crab cavity system development for the ILC
T2 - 36th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop on Nano Scale Beams, NANOBEAM 2005
AU - Goudket, P.
AU - Ma, L.
AU - Kalinin, A.
AU - Beard, C.
AU - Burt, G.
AU - Dexter, A.
A2 - Y., Honda
A2 - T., Tauchi
A2 - J., Urakawa
A2 - Y., Iwashita
A2 - A., Noda
N1 - Conference code: 156553 Export Date: 19 March 2020 References: (2004) First ILC Workshop, , http://lcdev.kek.jp/ILCWS/Talks/15ple-4-WG4_summary.pdf; Burt, G., (2005) Crab Cavity Errors, Crab Cavity Videoconference, , http://www.astec.ac.uk/rf/PDFs/crab/talk_02.pdf, April; Goudket, P., Burt, G., (2005) Snowmass Workshop, , http://alcpg2005.colorado.edu:8080/alcpg2005/program/accelerator/WG4/aug18_burt_Crabsnow.ppt; McAshan, M., Wanzenberg, R., (2001) RF Design of a Transverse Mode Cavity for Kaon Separation, , Fermilab-TM-2144 May; Bellantoni, L., (2005) Snowmass Workshop, , http://alcpg2005.colorado.edu:8080/alcpg2005/program/accelerator/WG4/aug18_CRAB_intro_bellantoni.pdf; Drozhdin, A., http://wwwproject.slac.stanford.edu/lc/bdir/Meetings/beamdelivery/2005-09-27/summary.htm; Liepe, M., Pushing, Q.L., (2005) Proc. ERL 2005 Workshop, , March
PY - 2020/10/21
Y1 - 2020/10/21
N2 - The crab cavity project covers all aspects of the development of the crab cavity system for the ILC. Main issues are the phase control tolerances, which are very tight in order to achieve acceptable luminosity losses, integration into the beam delivery system, and extraction of undesirable modes from the cavity. Differential phase jitter is found to be the tightest phase control requirement (0.066° at 3.9GHz), and will require the development of a high precision control system. The integration of the cavity into the BDS should not pose any particular problems in the case of a 20mrad crossing angle solution, space constraints may present challenges for much smaller crossing angles. The cavity should be placed as close as possible to the final focusing doublet. The crab cavity should be superconducting in order to minimise phase noise. Extraction of the lower order mode is an issue that must be addressed. © 2020 Proceedings of NANOBEAM 2005, 36th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop. All rights reserved.
AB - The crab cavity project covers all aspects of the development of the crab cavity system for the ILC. Main issues are the phase control tolerances, which are very tight in order to achieve acceptable luminosity losses, integration into the beam delivery system, and extraction of undesirable modes from the cavity. Differential phase jitter is found to be the tightest phase control requirement (0.066° at 3.9GHz), and will require the development of a high precision control system. The integration of the cavity into the BDS should not pose any particular problems in the case of a 20mrad crossing angle solution, space constraints may present challenges for much smaller crossing angles. The cavity should be placed as close as possible to the final focusing doublet. The crab cavity should be superconducting in order to minimise phase noise. Extraction of the lower order mode is an issue that must be addressed. © 2020 Proceedings of NANOBEAM 2005, 36th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop. All rights reserved.
KW - Excitons
KW - Extraction
KW - Nanowires
KW - Phase control
KW - Beam delivery systems
KW - Cavity system
KW - Crossing angles
KW - Differential phase
KW - High precision control
KW - Lower order mode
KW - Space constraints
KW - Two term control systems
M3 - Conference paper
SP - 191
EP - 193
Y2 - 17 October 2005 through 21 October 2005
ER -