Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Strategic sponsoring in professional sport

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Strategic sponsoring in professional sport: a review and conceptualization

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Strategic sponsoring in professional sport: a review and conceptualization. / Demir, Robert; Söderman, Sten.
In: European Sport Management Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 3, 08.06.2015, p. 271-300.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Demir, R & Söderman, S 2015, 'Strategic sponsoring in professional sport: a review and conceptualization', European Sport Management Quarterly, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 271-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2015.1042000

APA

Vancouver

Demir R, Söderman S. Strategic sponsoring in professional sport: a review and conceptualization. European Sport Management Quarterly. 2015 Jun 8;15(3):271-300. doi: 10.1080/16184742.2015.1042000

Author

Demir, Robert ; Söderman, Sten. / Strategic sponsoring in professional sport : a review and conceptualization. In: European Sport Management Quarterly. 2015 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 271-300.

Bibtex

@article{e048ebf91b6340f2a80b8aba97820627,
title = "Strategic sponsoring in professional sport: a review and conceptualization",
abstract = "Research question: While the literature on sponsorship of sport has gained interest among scholars in diverse fields such as management, marketing, and psychology in recent years, scant attention has been paid to the extent in which sponsoring may serve as a strategic lever that is mutually beneficial for sponsors and sponsees. We, therefore, ask: What constitutes strategic sponsoring in professional sport? Research methods: In addressing our research question, we selectively review the literature on sport sponsoring, link it to the basic tenets of the resource-based view, and conceptualize this literature into a framework for strategic sponsoring in professional sport. Results and findings: In developing our framework, we consider the concept of regime as the key defining working principle of strategic sponsorship activities. We then elicit six different regimes: the cause regime, loyalty regime, appropriability regime, value-differential regime, heuristics-based regime, and associational regime. Each one of these regime types is further related to the six sponsorship activities identified in our literature review. Implications: In proposing how various regimes serve as generative mechanisms for altering the resource and knowledge-bases of sponsors and sponsees, we provide a conceptually rigorous framework of strategic sponsoring that expands the limits of extant views of sport sponsorship. Hence, our multilevel framework advances sponsorship theory through a more rigorous framing, and it provides practitioners clues for rethinking their sponsorship programs.",
keywords = "professional sport, RBV, regime, sponsorship, strategy",
author = "Robert Demir and Sten S{\"o}derman",
year = "2015",
month = jun,
day = "8",
doi = "10.1080/16184742.2015.1042000",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "271--300",
journal = "European Sport Management Quarterly",
issn = "1618-4742",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strategic sponsoring in professional sport

T2 - a review and conceptualization

AU - Demir, Robert

AU - Söderman, Sten

PY - 2015/6/8

Y1 - 2015/6/8

N2 - Research question: While the literature on sponsorship of sport has gained interest among scholars in diverse fields such as management, marketing, and psychology in recent years, scant attention has been paid to the extent in which sponsoring may serve as a strategic lever that is mutually beneficial for sponsors and sponsees. We, therefore, ask: What constitutes strategic sponsoring in professional sport? Research methods: In addressing our research question, we selectively review the literature on sport sponsoring, link it to the basic tenets of the resource-based view, and conceptualize this literature into a framework for strategic sponsoring in professional sport. Results and findings: In developing our framework, we consider the concept of regime as the key defining working principle of strategic sponsorship activities. We then elicit six different regimes: the cause regime, loyalty regime, appropriability regime, value-differential regime, heuristics-based regime, and associational regime. Each one of these regime types is further related to the six sponsorship activities identified in our literature review. Implications: In proposing how various regimes serve as generative mechanisms for altering the resource and knowledge-bases of sponsors and sponsees, we provide a conceptually rigorous framework of strategic sponsoring that expands the limits of extant views of sport sponsorship. Hence, our multilevel framework advances sponsorship theory through a more rigorous framing, and it provides practitioners clues for rethinking their sponsorship programs.

AB - Research question: While the literature on sponsorship of sport has gained interest among scholars in diverse fields such as management, marketing, and psychology in recent years, scant attention has been paid to the extent in which sponsoring may serve as a strategic lever that is mutually beneficial for sponsors and sponsees. We, therefore, ask: What constitutes strategic sponsoring in professional sport? Research methods: In addressing our research question, we selectively review the literature on sport sponsoring, link it to the basic tenets of the resource-based view, and conceptualize this literature into a framework for strategic sponsoring in professional sport. Results and findings: In developing our framework, we consider the concept of regime as the key defining working principle of strategic sponsorship activities. We then elicit six different regimes: the cause regime, loyalty regime, appropriability regime, value-differential regime, heuristics-based regime, and associational regime. Each one of these regime types is further related to the six sponsorship activities identified in our literature review. Implications: In proposing how various regimes serve as generative mechanisms for altering the resource and knowledge-bases of sponsors and sponsees, we provide a conceptually rigorous framework of strategic sponsoring that expands the limits of extant views of sport sponsorship. Hence, our multilevel framework advances sponsorship theory through a more rigorous framing, and it provides practitioners clues for rethinking their sponsorship programs.

KW - professional sport

KW - RBV

KW - regime

KW - sponsorship

KW - strategy

U2 - 10.1080/16184742.2015.1042000

DO - 10.1080/16184742.2015.1042000

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84938549979

VL - 15

SP - 271

EP - 300

JO - European Sport Management Quarterly

JF - European Sport Management Quarterly

SN - 1618-4742

IS - 3

ER -