Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Stress management and innovation interventions ...
View graph of relations

Stress management and innovation interventions at work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Stress management and innovation interventions at work. / Bunce, David; West, Michael.

In: Human Relations, Vol. 49, No. 2, 02.1996, p. 209-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bunce, David ; West, Michael. / Stress management and innovation interventions at work. In: Human Relations. 1996 ; Vol. 49, No. 2. pp. 209-232.

Bibtex

@article{ed1cbb9e900d4727908a7b5934121171,
title = "Stress management and innovation interventions at work",
abstract = "A study among health-care workers is reported where a traditional stress management program (n = 66) was compared with an intervention promoting innovation at work as a form of stress management (n = 52), and a control group (n = 84). Measures relating to both the process of participation in the respective interventions, and outcome in terms of psychological well-being were taken. The traditional program, emphasizing cognitive-behavioral and arousal reduction techniques, was associated with improvements in general psychological strain and job satisfaction. The intervention promoting innovative responses to stressors (e.g., changing work methods, modifying working relations with colleagues) was associated with improvements in work-related stress, and innovation. Statistical analysis suggested session process variables, in addition to the theoretical orientations of the respective interventions, were associated with outcome variance. Follow-up data, 1 year post-intervention, suggested short-term gains on outcome variables relating to psychological well-being were not maintained. However, increases in levels of innovation, although not apparent post-intervention (3 months), were significant after 1 year. It is concluded that stress management research should focus more on process variables, and that interventions promoting innovation at work, show some promise in addressing occupational strain. ",
keywords = "stress management , innovation , interventions",
author = "David Bunce and Michael West",
year = "1996",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1177/001872679604900205",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "209--232",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "0018-7267",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stress management and innovation interventions at work

AU - Bunce, David

AU - West, Michael

PY - 1996/2

Y1 - 1996/2

N2 - A study among health-care workers is reported where a traditional stress management program (n = 66) was compared with an intervention promoting innovation at work as a form of stress management (n = 52), and a control group (n = 84). Measures relating to both the process of participation in the respective interventions, and outcome in terms of psychological well-being were taken. The traditional program, emphasizing cognitive-behavioral and arousal reduction techniques, was associated with improvements in general psychological strain and job satisfaction. The intervention promoting innovative responses to stressors (e.g., changing work methods, modifying working relations with colleagues) was associated with improvements in work-related stress, and innovation. Statistical analysis suggested session process variables, in addition to the theoretical orientations of the respective interventions, were associated with outcome variance. Follow-up data, 1 year post-intervention, suggested short-term gains on outcome variables relating to psychological well-being were not maintained. However, increases in levels of innovation, although not apparent post-intervention (3 months), were significant after 1 year. It is concluded that stress management research should focus more on process variables, and that interventions promoting innovation at work, show some promise in addressing occupational strain.

AB - A study among health-care workers is reported where a traditional stress management program (n = 66) was compared with an intervention promoting innovation at work as a form of stress management (n = 52), and a control group (n = 84). Measures relating to both the process of participation in the respective interventions, and outcome in terms of psychological well-being were taken. The traditional program, emphasizing cognitive-behavioral and arousal reduction techniques, was associated with improvements in general psychological strain and job satisfaction. The intervention promoting innovative responses to stressors (e.g., changing work methods, modifying working relations with colleagues) was associated with improvements in work-related stress, and innovation. Statistical analysis suggested session process variables, in addition to the theoretical orientations of the respective interventions, were associated with outcome variance. Follow-up data, 1 year post-intervention, suggested short-term gains on outcome variables relating to psychological well-being were not maintained. However, increases in levels of innovation, although not apparent post-intervention (3 months), were significant after 1 year. It is concluded that stress management research should focus more on process variables, and that interventions promoting innovation at work, show some promise in addressing occupational strain.

KW - stress management

KW - innovation

KW - interventions

U2 - 10.1177/001872679604900205

DO - 10.1177/001872679604900205

M3 - Journal article

VL - 49

SP - 209

EP - 232

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 2

ER -