Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Students’ perceptions of the practice firms net...

Electronic data

  • Santos

    Final published version, 3.06 MB, PDF document

View graph of relations

Students’ perceptions of the practice firms network learning environment in Brazil: a phenomenographic approach

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Published

Standard

Students’ perceptions of the practice firms network learning environment in Brazil: a phenomenographic approach. / Santos, Jorge.
Lancaster: Lancaster University, 2008. 403 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Harvard

APA

Santos, J. (2008). Students’ perceptions of the practice firms network learning environment in Brazil: a phenomenographic approach. [Doctoral Thesis, Lancaster University]. Lancaster University.

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@phdthesis{6e7b2ae6dfc1471f9e998292386b7a79,
title = "Students{\textquoteright} perceptions of the practice firms network learning environment in Brazil: a phenomenographic approach",
abstract = "This research deals with how students of a particular learning environment inmanagement education, which I call here the Practice Firms Network LearningEnvironment (PFN), describe their relationship with this learning environment. In the PFN model students conceptualise, design and sell {\textquoteleft}virtual{\textquoteright} products and services to other people within the model, constituting a market that only exists by the pedagogical intentions of those involved with the model. The research was carried out to explore the relationship between students and the PFN model, and to describe the variation in perception of how students experienced this relationship, from their perspective.The research sample was composed of twenty-nine students from two educational institutions in Brazil, using a phenomenographic approach. The students were interviewed and their narratives were analysed and categorised.The analysis showed that the variation in students{\textquoteright} descriptions of their relationships with the PFN model could be synthesised in seven different categories. The students experienced their relationship with the PFN as a:1) Pointless experience;2) Discipline experience;3) Group Work experience;4) Competitive experience;5) Simulated experience;6) Way of Learning experience;7) Realistic experience.The conclusions extracted from the data were thata) Students experienced the PFN in qualitatively different ways;b) The range of variation could be arranged to show that students categorisedtheir experiences in the PFN from a completely pointless experience on onehand to a realistic engagement in the PFN on the other hand;c) From within a meaning dimension, students devalued the PFN model whenthey perceived it as a {\textquoteleft}pointless{\textquoteright} experience and valued it when they perceivedit as adding meaning to their experience;d) From within a structural dimension, students perceived the PFN model asstructured forms of experience to deal with tasks or situations. Whether or notthey learned from these structures was situational.In summary, the study concludes that students engage in learning activities in search of meaning. Nevertheless, the structures of educational activities influence if and how students will achieve their meaning purposes.",
keywords = "Practice Firms, Learning Environments, Students{\textquoteright} Approach, Phenomenography",
author = "Jorge Santos",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",
school = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Students’ perceptions of the practice firms network learning environment in Brazil

T2 - a phenomenographic approach

AU - Santos, Jorge

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This research deals with how students of a particular learning environment inmanagement education, which I call here the Practice Firms Network LearningEnvironment (PFN), describe their relationship with this learning environment. In the PFN model students conceptualise, design and sell ‘virtual’ products and services to other people within the model, constituting a market that only exists by the pedagogical intentions of those involved with the model. The research was carried out to explore the relationship between students and the PFN model, and to describe the variation in perception of how students experienced this relationship, from their perspective.The research sample was composed of twenty-nine students from two educational institutions in Brazil, using a phenomenographic approach. The students were interviewed and their narratives were analysed and categorised.The analysis showed that the variation in students’ descriptions of their relationships with the PFN model could be synthesised in seven different categories. The students experienced their relationship with the PFN as a:1) Pointless experience;2) Discipline experience;3) Group Work experience;4) Competitive experience;5) Simulated experience;6) Way of Learning experience;7) Realistic experience.The conclusions extracted from the data were thata) Students experienced the PFN in qualitatively different ways;b) The range of variation could be arranged to show that students categorisedtheir experiences in the PFN from a completely pointless experience on onehand to a realistic engagement in the PFN on the other hand;c) From within a meaning dimension, students devalued the PFN model whenthey perceived it as a ‘pointless’ experience and valued it when they perceivedit as adding meaning to their experience;d) From within a structural dimension, students perceived the PFN model asstructured forms of experience to deal with tasks or situations. Whether or notthey learned from these structures was situational.In summary, the study concludes that students engage in learning activities in search of meaning. Nevertheless, the structures of educational activities influence if and how students will achieve their meaning purposes.

AB - This research deals with how students of a particular learning environment inmanagement education, which I call here the Practice Firms Network LearningEnvironment (PFN), describe their relationship with this learning environment. In the PFN model students conceptualise, design and sell ‘virtual’ products and services to other people within the model, constituting a market that only exists by the pedagogical intentions of those involved with the model. The research was carried out to explore the relationship between students and the PFN model, and to describe the variation in perception of how students experienced this relationship, from their perspective.The research sample was composed of twenty-nine students from two educational institutions in Brazil, using a phenomenographic approach. The students were interviewed and their narratives were analysed and categorised.The analysis showed that the variation in students’ descriptions of their relationships with the PFN model could be synthesised in seven different categories. The students experienced their relationship with the PFN as a:1) Pointless experience;2) Discipline experience;3) Group Work experience;4) Competitive experience;5) Simulated experience;6) Way of Learning experience;7) Realistic experience.The conclusions extracted from the data were thata) Students experienced the PFN in qualitatively different ways;b) The range of variation could be arranged to show that students categorisedtheir experiences in the PFN from a completely pointless experience on onehand to a realistic engagement in the PFN on the other hand;c) From within a meaning dimension, students devalued the PFN model whenthey perceived it as a ‘pointless’ experience and valued it when they perceivedit as adding meaning to their experience;d) From within a structural dimension, students perceived the PFN model asstructured forms of experience to deal with tasks or situations. Whether or notthey learned from these structures was situational.In summary, the study concludes that students engage in learning activities in search of meaning. Nevertheless, the structures of educational activities influence if and how students will achieve their meaning purposes.

KW - Practice Firms

KW - Learning Environments

KW - Students’ Approach

KW - Phenomenography

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - Lancaster University

CY - Lancaster

ER -