Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Subverting the architectural design competition
View graph of relations

Subverting the architectural design competition

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Conference paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

Subverting the architectural design competition. / Dalton, Ruth; Hoelscher, Christoph; Holgate, Peter et al.
2012. Paper presented at Theory by Design, Antwerp, Belgium.

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Conference paperpeer-review

Harvard

Dalton, R, Hoelscher, C, Holgate, P & Brösamle, M 2012, 'Subverting the architectural design competition', Paper presented at Theory by Design, Antwerp, Belgium, 29/10/12 - 31/10/02.

APA

Dalton, R., Hoelscher, C., Holgate, P., & Brösamle, M. (2012). Subverting the architectural design competition. Paper presented at Theory by Design, Antwerp, Belgium.

Vancouver

Dalton R, Hoelscher C, Holgate P, Brösamle M. Subverting the architectural design competition. 2012. Paper presented at Theory by Design, Antwerp, Belgium.

Author

Dalton, Ruth ; Hoelscher, Christoph ; Holgate, Peter et al. / Subverting the architectural design competition. Paper presented at Theory by Design, Antwerp, Belgium.

Bibtex

@conference{04d689d8bbf44a0aa89723461eb43cce,
title = "Subverting the architectural design competition",
abstract = "In 2011 a seemingly 'typical' architectural competition was organised (consisting of a real site, design brief, International jury and prizes) by the Universities of Freiburg and Bremen (Germany) in collaboration with Northumbria University (UK) but with an ulterior motive of pursuing a specific design-research agenda. The reasons for the competition were: to engage architects in an academic research agenda through a comfortingly familiar modus operandi; to bring together researchers in architectural theory/spatial cognition and practising architects with an interest in user-centred design; to use a design competition as a means to investigate the effects of designing with a particular focus (in this case: movement paths/pedestrian flow and the unfolding user experience); to amass a uniform database of example buildings, all responding to the same brief and site whilst also in a common format amenable to further research analysis. The competition was entered by 30 teams of which a short-list of 12 schemes was selected for exhibition in New York, which took place in November 2011. Three schemes were selected as prize-winners and those designers were invited to present at an academic workshop (on the topic of spatial cognition and architectural design) held concurrently with the exhibition. The compe-tition was perceived as being a highly productive way to engage design practitioners in an active research agenda (and vice versa). The winning architects who subsequently participated in the workshop found it a valuable experience whilst the competi-tion organisers have now amassed a valuable database that will be invaluable resource for further research into the topic. The success of this event has led to plans to repeat the process.",
author = "Ruth Dalton and Christoph Hoelscher and Peter Holgate and Martin Br{\"o}samle",
year = "2012",
month = oct,
day = "1",
language = "English",
note = "Theory by Design : Architectural Research made explicit in the design teaching studio ; Conference date: 29-10-2012 Through 31-10-2102",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Subverting the architectural design competition

AU - Dalton, Ruth

AU - Hoelscher, Christoph

AU - Holgate, Peter

AU - Brösamle, Martin

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - In 2011 a seemingly 'typical' architectural competition was organised (consisting of a real site, design brief, International jury and prizes) by the Universities of Freiburg and Bremen (Germany) in collaboration with Northumbria University (UK) but with an ulterior motive of pursuing a specific design-research agenda. The reasons for the competition were: to engage architects in an academic research agenda through a comfortingly familiar modus operandi; to bring together researchers in architectural theory/spatial cognition and practising architects with an interest in user-centred design; to use a design competition as a means to investigate the effects of designing with a particular focus (in this case: movement paths/pedestrian flow and the unfolding user experience); to amass a uniform database of example buildings, all responding to the same brief and site whilst also in a common format amenable to further research analysis. The competition was entered by 30 teams of which a short-list of 12 schemes was selected for exhibition in New York, which took place in November 2011. Three schemes were selected as prize-winners and those designers were invited to present at an academic workshop (on the topic of spatial cognition and architectural design) held concurrently with the exhibition. The compe-tition was perceived as being a highly productive way to engage design practitioners in an active research agenda (and vice versa). The winning architects who subsequently participated in the workshop found it a valuable experience whilst the competi-tion organisers have now amassed a valuable database that will be invaluable resource for further research into the topic. The success of this event has led to plans to repeat the process.

AB - In 2011 a seemingly 'typical' architectural competition was organised (consisting of a real site, design brief, International jury and prizes) by the Universities of Freiburg and Bremen (Germany) in collaboration with Northumbria University (UK) but with an ulterior motive of pursuing a specific design-research agenda. The reasons for the competition were: to engage architects in an academic research agenda through a comfortingly familiar modus operandi; to bring together researchers in architectural theory/spatial cognition and practising architects with an interest in user-centred design; to use a design competition as a means to investigate the effects of designing with a particular focus (in this case: movement paths/pedestrian flow and the unfolding user experience); to amass a uniform database of example buildings, all responding to the same brief and site whilst also in a common format amenable to further research analysis. The competition was entered by 30 teams of which a short-list of 12 schemes was selected for exhibition in New York, which took place in November 2011. Three schemes were selected as prize-winners and those designers were invited to present at an academic workshop (on the topic of spatial cognition and architectural design) held concurrently with the exhibition. The compe-tition was perceived as being a highly productive way to engage design practitioners in an active research agenda (and vice versa). The winning architects who subsequently participated in the workshop found it a valuable experience whilst the competi-tion organisers have now amassed a valuable database that will be invaluable resource for further research into the topic. The success of this event has led to plans to repeat the process.

M3 - Conference paper

T2 - Theory by Design

Y2 - 29 October 2012 through 31 October 2102

ER -