Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Sustaining SBIRT in the wild: simulating revenu...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Sustaining SBIRT in the wild: simulating revenues and costs for Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Sustaining SBIRT in the wild: simulating revenues and costs for Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs. / Cowell, Alexander J.; Dowd, Bill; Mills, Michael J. et al.
In: Addiction (Abingdon, England), Vol. 112, No. Suppl. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 101-109.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Cowell, AJ, Dowd, B, Mills, MJ, Hinde, JM & Bray, JW 2017, 'Sustaining SBIRT in the wild: simulating revenues and costs for Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs.', Addiction (Abingdon, England), vol. 112, no. Suppl. 2, pp. 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13650

APA

Cowell, A. J., Dowd, B., Mills, M. J., Hinde, J. M., & Bray, J. W. (2017). Sustaining SBIRT in the wild: simulating revenues and costs for Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 112(Suppl. 2), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13650

Vancouver

Cowell AJ, Dowd B, Mills MJ, Hinde JM, Bray JW. Sustaining SBIRT in the wild: simulating revenues and costs for Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs. Addiction (Abingdon, England). 2017 Feb 1;112(Suppl. 2):101-109. Epub 2017 Jan 10. doi: 10.1111/add.13650

Author

Cowell, Alexander J. ; Dowd, Bill ; Mills, Michael J. et al. / Sustaining SBIRT in the wild: simulating revenues and costs for Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs. In: Addiction (Abingdon, England). 2017 ; Vol. 112, No. Suppl. 2. pp. 101-109.

Bibtex

@article{93b5e1d3b53b4507bb7f12527778e4da,
title = "Sustaining SBIRT in the wild: simulating revenues and costs for Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs.",
abstract = "AIMS:To examine the conditions under which Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) programs can be sustained by health insurance payments. DESIGN:A mathematical model was used to estimate the number of patients needed for revenues to exceed costs. SETTING:Three medical settings in the United States were examined: in-patient, out-patient and emergency department. Components of SBIRT were delivered by combinations of health-care practitioners (generalists) and behavioral health specialists. PARTICIPANTS:Practitioners in seven SBIRT programs who received grants from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). MEASUREMENTS:Program costs and revenues were measured using data from grantees. Patient flows were measured from administrative data and adjusted with prevalence and screening estimates from the literature. FINDINGS:SBIRT can be sustained through health insurance reimbursement in out-patient and emergency department settings in most staffing mixes. To sustain SBIRT in in-patient programs, a patient flow larger than the national average may be needed; if that flow is achieved, the range of screens required to maintain a surplus is narrow. Sensitivity analyses suggest that the results are very sensitive to changes in the proportion of insured patients. CONCLUSIONS:Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs in the United States can be sustained by health insurance payments under a variety of staffing models. Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs can be sustained only in an in-patient setting with above-average patient flow (more than 2500 screens). Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs in out-patient and emergency department settings can be sustained with below-average patient flows (fewer than 125 000 out-patient visits and fewer than 27 000 emergency department visits).",
keywords = "Cost, health insurance, revenue, SBIRT, screening and brief intervention, simulation, sustainability",
author = "Cowell, {Alexander J.} and Bill Dowd and Mills, {Michael J.} and Hinde, {Jesse M.} and Bray, {Jeremy W.}",
year = "2017",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/add.13650",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "101--109",
journal = "Addiction (Abingdon, England)",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "Suppl. 2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustaining SBIRT in the wild: simulating revenues and costs for Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs.

AU - Cowell, Alexander J.

AU - Dowd, Bill

AU - Mills, Michael J.

AU - Hinde, Jesse M.

AU - Bray, Jeremy W.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - AIMS:To examine the conditions under which Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) programs can be sustained by health insurance payments. DESIGN:A mathematical model was used to estimate the number of patients needed for revenues to exceed costs. SETTING:Three medical settings in the United States were examined: in-patient, out-patient and emergency department. Components of SBIRT were delivered by combinations of health-care practitioners (generalists) and behavioral health specialists. PARTICIPANTS:Practitioners in seven SBIRT programs who received grants from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). MEASUREMENTS:Program costs and revenues were measured using data from grantees. Patient flows were measured from administrative data and adjusted with prevalence and screening estimates from the literature. FINDINGS:SBIRT can be sustained through health insurance reimbursement in out-patient and emergency department settings in most staffing mixes. To sustain SBIRT in in-patient programs, a patient flow larger than the national average may be needed; if that flow is achieved, the range of screens required to maintain a surplus is narrow. Sensitivity analyses suggest that the results are very sensitive to changes in the proportion of insured patients. CONCLUSIONS:Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs in the United States can be sustained by health insurance payments under a variety of staffing models. Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs can be sustained only in an in-patient setting with above-average patient flow (more than 2500 screens). Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs in out-patient and emergency department settings can be sustained with below-average patient flows (fewer than 125 000 out-patient visits and fewer than 27 000 emergency department visits).

AB - AIMS:To examine the conditions under which Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) programs can be sustained by health insurance payments. DESIGN:A mathematical model was used to estimate the number of patients needed for revenues to exceed costs. SETTING:Three medical settings in the United States were examined: in-patient, out-patient and emergency department. Components of SBIRT were delivered by combinations of health-care practitioners (generalists) and behavioral health specialists. PARTICIPANTS:Practitioners in seven SBIRT programs who received grants from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). MEASUREMENTS:Program costs and revenues were measured using data from grantees. Patient flows were measured from administrative data and adjusted with prevalence and screening estimates from the literature. FINDINGS:SBIRT can be sustained through health insurance reimbursement in out-patient and emergency department settings in most staffing mixes. To sustain SBIRT in in-patient programs, a patient flow larger than the national average may be needed; if that flow is achieved, the range of screens required to maintain a surplus is narrow. Sensitivity analyses suggest that the results are very sensitive to changes in the proportion of insured patients. CONCLUSIONS:Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs in the United States can be sustained by health insurance payments under a variety of staffing models. Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs can be sustained only in an in-patient setting with above-average patient flow (more than 2500 screens). Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs in out-patient and emergency department settings can be sustained with below-average patient flows (fewer than 125 000 out-patient visits and fewer than 27 000 emergency department visits).

KW - Cost

KW - health insurance

KW - revenue

KW - SBIRT

KW - screening and brief intervention

KW - simulation, sustainability

U2 - 10.1111/add.13650

DO - 10.1111/add.13650

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 28074564

VL - 112

SP - 101

EP - 109

JO - Addiction (Abingdon, England)

JF - Addiction (Abingdon, England)

IS - Suppl. 2

ER -