Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Synergistic interventions to control COVID-19

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Synergistic interventions to control COVID-19: Mass testing and isolation mitigates reliance on distancing

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Synergistic interventions to control COVID-19: Mass testing and isolation mitigates reliance on distancing. / Howerton, E.; Ferrari, M.J.; Bjørnstad, O.N. et al.
In: PLoS Computational Biology, Vol. 17, No. 10, e1009518, 28.10.2021.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Howerton, E, Ferrari, MJ, Bjørnstad, ON, Bogich, TL, Borchering, RK, Jewell, CP, Nichols, JD, Probert, WJM, Runge, MC, Tildesley, MJ, Viboud, C & Shea, K 2021, 'Synergistic interventions to control COVID-19: Mass testing and isolation mitigates reliance on distancing', PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 17, no. 10, e1009518. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009518

APA

Howerton, E., Ferrari, M. J., Bjørnstad, O. N., Bogich, T. L., Borchering, R. K., Jewell, C. P., Nichols, J. D., Probert, W. J. M., Runge, M. C., Tildesley, M. J., Viboud, C., & Shea, K. (2021). Synergistic interventions to control COVID-19: Mass testing and isolation mitigates reliance on distancing. PLoS Computational Biology, 17(10), Article e1009518. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009518

Vancouver

Howerton E, Ferrari MJ, Bjørnstad ON, Bogich TL, Borchering RK, Jewell CP et al. Synergistic interventions to control COVID-19: Mass testing and isolation mitigates reliance on distancing. PLoS Computational Biology. 2021 Oct 28;17(10):e1009518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009518

Author

Howerton, E. ; Ferrari, M.J. ; Bjørnstad, O.N. et al. / Synergistic interventions to control COVID-19 : Mass testing and isolation mitigates reliance on distancing. In: PLoS Computational Biology. 2021 ; Vol. 17, No. 10.

Bibtex

@article{ac382fe9cae34274824caaf74c5165df,
title = "Synergistic interventions to control COVID-19: Mass testing and isolation mitigates reliance on distancing",
abstract = "Stay-at-home orders and shutdowns of non-essential businesses are powerful, but socially costly, tools to control the pandemic spread of SARS-CoV-2. Mass testing strategies, which rely on widely administered frequent and rapid diagnostics to identify and isolate infected individuals, could be a potentially less disruptive management strategy, particularly where vaccine access is limited. In this paper, we assess the extent to which mass testing and isolation strategies can reduce reliance on socially costly non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as distancing and shutdowns. We develop a multi-compartmental model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission incorporating both preventative non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and testing and isolation to evaluate their combined effect on public health outcomes. Our model is designed to be a policy-guiding tool that captures important realities of the testing system, including constraints on test administration and non-random testing allocation. We show how strategic changes in the characteristics of the testing system, including test administration, test delays, and test sensitivity, can reduce reliance on preventative NPIs without compromising public health outcomes in the future. The lowest NPI levels are possible only when many tests are administered and test delays are short, given limited immunity in the population. Reducing reliance on NPIs is highly dependent on the ability of a testing program to identify and isolate unreported, asymptomatic infections. Changes in NPIs, including the intensity of lockdowns and stay at home orders, should be coordinated with increases in testing to ensure epidemic control; otherwise small additional lifting of these NPIs can lead to dramatic increases in infections, hospitalizations and deaths. Importantly, our results can be used to guide ramp-up of testing capacity in outbreak settings, allow for the flexible design of combined interventions based on social context, and inform future cost-benefit analyses to identify efficient pandemic management strategies. ",
keywords = "Article, asymptomatic disease, coronavirus disease 2019, death, disease control, disease transmission, health care policy, hospitalization, immunity, isolation, lockdown, mass screening, public health, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, social distancing, virus transmission",
author = "E. Howerton and M.J. Ferrari and O.N. Bj{\o}rnstad and T.L. Bogich and R.K. Borchering and C.P. Jewell and J.D. Nichols and W.J.M. Probert and M.C. Runge and M.J. Tildesley and C. Viboud and K. Shea",
year = "2021",
month = oct,
day = "28",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009518",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
journal = "PLoS Computational Biology",
issn = "1553-734X",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Synergistic interventions to control COVID-19

T2 - Mass testing and isolation mitigates reliance on distancing

AU - Howerton, E.

AU - Ferrari, M.J.

AU - Bjørnstad, O.N.

AU - Bogich, T.L.

AU - Borchering, R.K.

AU - Jewell, C.P.

AU - Nichols, J.D.

AU - Probert, W.J.M.

AU - Runge, M.C.

AU - Tildesley, M.J.

AU - Viboud, C.

AU - Shea, K.

PY - 2021/10/28

Y1 - 2021/10/28

N2 - Stay-at-home orders and shutdowns of non-essential businesses are powerful, but socially costly, tools to control the pandemic spread of SARS-CoV-2. Mass testing strategies, which rely on widely administered frequent and rapid diagnostics to identify and isolate infected individuals, could be a potentially less disruptive management strategy, particularly where vaccine access is limited. In this paper, we assess the extent to which mass testing and isolation strategies can reduce reliance on socially costly non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as distancing and shutdowns. We develop a multi-compartmental model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission incorporating both preventative non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and testing and isolation to evaluate their combined effect on public health outcomes. Our model is designed to be a policy-guiding tool that captures important realities of the testing system, including constraints on test administration and non-random testing allocation. We show how strategic changes in the characteristics of the testing system, including test administration, test delays, and test sensitivity, can reduce reliance on preventative NPIs without compromising public health outcomes in the future. The lowest NPI levels are possible only when many tests are administered and test delays are short, given limited immunity in the population. Reducing reliance on NPIs is highly dependent on the ability of a testing program to identify and isolate unreported, asymptomatic infections. Changes in NPIs, including the intensity of lockdowns and stay at home orders, should be coordinated with increases in testing to ensure epidemic control; otherwise small additional lifting of these NPIs can lead to dramatic increases in infections, hospitalizations and deaths. Importantly, our results can be used to guide ramp-up of testing capacity in outbreak settings, allow for the flexible design of combined interventions based on social context, and inform future cost-benefit analyses to identify efficient pandemic management strategies.

AB - Stay-at-home orders and shutdowns of non-essential businesses are powerful, but socially costly, tools to control the pandemic spread of SARS-CoV-2. Mass testing strategies, which rely on widely administered frequent and rapid diagnostics to identify and isolate infected individuals, could be a potentially less disruptive management strategy, particularly where vaccine access is limited. In this paper, we assess the extent to which mass testing and isolation strategies can reduce reliance on socially costly non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as distancing and shutdowns. We develop a multi-compartmental model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission incorporating both preventative non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and testing and isolation to evaluate their combined effect on public health outcomes. Our model is designed to be a policy-guiding tool that captures important realities of the testing system, including constraints on test administration and non-random testing allocation. We show how strategic changes in the characteristics of the testing system, including test administration, test delays, and test sensitivity, can reduce reliance on preventative NPIs without compromising public health outcomes in the future. The lowest NPI levels are possible only when many tests are administered and test delays are short, given limited immunity in the population. Reducing reliance on NPIs is highly dependent on the ability of a testing program to identify and isolate unreported, asymptomatic infections. Changes in NPIs, including the intensity of lockdowns and stay at home orders, should be coordinated with increases in testing to ensure epidemic control; otherwise small additional lifting of these NPIs can lead to dramatic increases in infections, hospitalizations and deaths. Importantly, our results can be used to guide ramp-up of testing capacity in outbreak settings, allow for the flexible design of combined interventions based on social context, and inform future cost-benefit analyses to identify efficient pandemic management strategies.

KW - Article

KW - asymptomatic disease

KW - coronavirus disease 2019

KW - death

KW - disease control

KW - disease transmission

KW - health care policy

KW - hospitalization

KW - immunity

KW - isolation

KW - lockdown

KW - mass screening

KW - public health

KW - Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

KW - social distancing

KW - virus transmission

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009518

DO - 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009518

M3 - Journal article

VL - 17

JO - PLoS Computational Biology

JF - PLoS Computational Biology

SN - 1553-734X

IS - 10

M1 - e1009518

ER -