Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning. / Beesley, T.; Wills, A.J.; le Pelley, M.E.
In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, 02.2010, p. 122-128.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Beesley, T, Wills, AJ & le Pelley, ME 2010, 'Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning', Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 122-128. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.1.122

APA

Beesley, T., Wills, A. J., & le Pelley, M. E. (2010). Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17(1), 122-128. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.1.122

Vancouver

Beesley T, Wills AJ, le Pelley ME. Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2010 Feb;17(1):122-128. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.122

Author

Beesley, T. ; Wills, A.J. ; le Pelley, M.E. / Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning. In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2010 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 122-128.

Bibtex

@article{98cee67746124a699188057d36d152c7,
title = "Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning",
abstract = "In an artificial grammar learning (AGL) experiment, participants were trained with instances of one grammatical structure before completing a test phase in which they were required to discriminate grammatical from randomly created strings. Importantly, the underlying structure used to generate test strings was different from that used to generate the training strings. Despite the fact that grammatical training strings were more similar to nongrammatical test strings than they were to grammatical test strings, this manipulation resulted in a positive transfer effect, as compared with controls trained with nongrammatical strings. It is suggested that training with grammatical strings leads to an appreciation of set variance that aids the detection of grammatical test strings in AGL tasks. The analysis presented demonstrates that it is useful to conceptualize test performance in AGL as a form of unsupervised category learning.",
author = "T. Beesley and A.J. Wills and {le Pelley}, M.E.",
note = "cited By 3",
year = "2010",
month = feb,
doi = "10.3758/PBR.17.1.122",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "122--128",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning

AU - Beesley, T.

AU - Wills, A.J.

AU - le Pelley, M.E.

N1 - cited By 3

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - In an artificial grammar learning (AGL) experiment, participants were trained with instances of one grammatical structure before completing a test phase in which they were required to discriminate grammatical from randomly created strings. Importantly, the underlying structure used to generate test strings was different from that used to generate the training strings. Despite the fact that grammatical training strings were more similar to nongrammatical test strings than they were to grammatical test strings, this manipulation resulted in a positive transfer effect, as compared with controls trained with nongrammatical strings. It is suggested that training with grammatical strings leads to an appreciation of set variance that aids the detection of grammatical test strings in AGL tasks. The analysis presented demonstrates that it is useful to conceptualize test performance in AGL as a form of unsupervised category learning.

AB - In an artificial grammar learning (AGL) experiment, participants were trained with instances of one grammatical structure before completing a test phase in which they were required to discriminate grammatical from randomly created strings. Importantly, the underlying structure used to generate test strings was different from that used to generate the training strings. Despite the fact that grammatical training strings were more similar to nongrammatical test strings than they were to grammatical test strings, this manipulation resulted in a positive transfer effect, as compared with controls trained with nongrammatical strings. It is suggested that training with grammatical strings leads to an appreciation of set variance that aids the detection of grammatical test strings in AGL tasks. The analysis presented demonstrates that it is useful to conceptualize test performance in AGL as a form of unsupervised category learning.

U2 - 10.3758/PBR.17.1.122

DO - 10.3758/PBR.17.1.122

M3 - Journal article

VL - 17

SP - 122

EP - 128

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 1

ER -