Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Synthetic faces


Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Synthetic faces: how perceptually convincing are they?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineMeeting abstract

Article number2015
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>27/09/2021
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Vision
Issue number9
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English
EventVision Sciences Society Annual Meeting 2021 - Virtual
Duration: 21/05/202126/05/2021


OtherVision Sciences Society Annual Meeting 2021


Recent advances in machine learning, specifically generative adversarial networks (GANs), have made it possible to synthesize highly photo-realistic faces. Such synthetic faces have been used in the creation of fraudulent social media accounts, including the creation of a fictional candidate for U.S. Congress. It has been shown that deep neural networks can be trained to discriminate between real and synthesized faces; it remains unknown, however, if humans can. We examined people’s ability to discriminate between synthetic and real faces. We selected 400 faces synthesized using the state of the art StyleGAN2, further ensuring diversity across gender, age, and race. A convolutional neural network descriptor was used to extract a low-dimensional, perceptually meaningful, representation of each face. For each of the 400 synthesized faces, this representation was used to find the most similar real faces in the Flickr-Faces-HQ (FFHQ) dataset. From these, we manually selected a matching face that did not contain additional discriminative cues (e.g., complex background, other people in the scene). Participants (N=315) were recruited from Mechanical Turk and given a brief tutorial consisting of examples of synthesized and real faces. Each participant then saw 128 trials, each consisting of a single face, either synthesized or real, and had unlimited time to classify the face accordingly. Although unknown to the participant, half of the faces were real and half were synthesized. Across the 128 trials, faces were equally balanced in terms of gender and race. Average performance was close to chance with no response bias (d-prime = -0.09; beta = 0.99). These results suggest that StyleGAN2 can successfully synthesize faces that are realistic enough to fool naive observers. We are examining whether a more detailed training session, raising participants’ awareness of some common synthesis artifacts, will improve their ability to detect synthetic faces.