Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Taking the New Year’s Resolution Test seriously

Electronic data

  • New_year_s_resolution_full_for_pure

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioural Public Policy, ? (?), pp ?-?, 2022, © 2022 Cambridge University Press.

    Accepted author manuscript, 383 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Taking the New Year’s Resolution Test seriously: Eliciting individuals’ judgements about self-control and spontaneity

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print
  • Kevin Grubiak
  • Andrea Isoni
  • Robert Sugden
  • Mengjie Wang
  • Jiwei Zheng
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>31/01/2022
<mark>Journal</mark>Behavioural Public Policy
Pages (from-to)1-23
Publication StatusE-pub ahead of print
Early online date31/01/22
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Self-control failure occurs when an individual experiences a conflict between immediate desires and longer-term goals, recognises psychological forces that hinder goal-directed action, tries to resist them but fails in the attempt. Behavioural economists often invoke assumptions about self-control failure to justify proposals for policy interventions. These arguments require workable methods for eliciting individuals’ goals and for verifying occurrences of self-control failure, but developing such methods confronts two problems. First, it is not clear that individuals’ goals are context-independent. Second, facing an actual conflict between a desire and a self-acknowledged goal, a person may consciously choose not to resist the desire, thinking that spontaneity is more important than self-control. We address these issues through an online survey that elicited individuals’ self-reported judgements about the relative importance of self-control and spontaneity in conflicts between enjoyment and health-related goals. To test for context-sensitivity, the judgement-elicitation questions were preceded by a memory recall task which directed participants’ attention either to the enjoyment of acting on desires or to the satisfaction of achieving goals. We found little evidence of context-sensitivity. In both treatments, however, judgements that favoured spontaneity were expressed with roughly the same frequency and strength as judgments that favoured self-control.

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioural Public Policy, ? (?), pp ?-?, 2022, © 2022 Cambridge University Press.