Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Task-based interactions in classroom and labora...
View graph of relations

Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. / Gass, S.M.; Mackey, Alison Jayne; Ross-Feldman, L.
In: Language Learning, Vol. 55, No. 4, 12.2005, p. 189-220.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Gass, SM, Mackey, AJ & Ross-Feldman, L 2005, 'Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings', Language Learning, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 189-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00318.x

APA

Vancouver

Gass SM, Mackey AJ, Ross-Feldman L. Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning. 2005 Dec;55(4):189-220. Epub 2005 Nov 8. doi: 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00318.x

Author

Gass, S.M. ; Mackey, Alison Jayne ; Ross-Feldman, L. / Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. In: Language Learning. 2005 ; Vol. 55, No. 4. pp. 189-220.

Bibtex

@article{f8715393a5304fc4b5fdb8fe82be1264,
title = "Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings",
abstract = "While there is general agreement that conversational interaction can facilitate interlanguage development, much of the research on interaction has been conducted in experimental aboratory settings. Questions have been raised about the generalizability of the benefits observed in the laboratory to the classroom setting. The current research compared interaction in classrooms and laboratories. Seventy‐four university‐level students learning Spanish as a foreign language worked in dyads to complete 3 different communicative activities in classroom and laboratory settings. Analysis of the interactional patterns of each dyad provided insights into the nature of the interaction in each setting. The data suggest few differences in interactional patterns between the settings. Instead, there were differences depending on the type of task that the learners carried out.",
author = "S.M. Gass and Mackey, {Alison Jayne} and L. Ross-Feldman",
year = "2005",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00318.x",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "189--220",
journal = "Language Learning",
issn = "0023-8333",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings

AU - Gass, S.M.

AU - Mackey, Alison Jayne

AU - Ross-Feldman, L.

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - While there is general agreement that conversational interaction can facilitate interlanguage development, much of the research on interaction has been conducted in experimental aboratory settings. Questions have been raised about the generalizability of the benefits observed in the laboratory to the classroom setting. The current research compared interaction in classrooms and laboratories. Seventy‐four university‐level students learning Spanish as a foreign language worked in dyads to complete 3 different communicative activities in classroom and laboratory settings. Analysis of the interactional patterns of each dyad provided insights into the nature of the interaction in each setting. The data suggest few differences in interactional patterns between the settings. Instead, there were differences depending on the type of task that the learners carried out.

AB - While there is general agreement that conversational interaction can facilitate interlanguage development, much of the research on interaction has been conducted in experimental aboratory settings. Questions have been raised about the generalizability of the benefits observed in the laboratory to the classroom setting. The current research compared interaction in classrooms and laboratories. Seventy‐four university‐level students learning Spanish as a foreign language worked in dyads to complete 3 different communicative activities in classroom and laboratory settings. Analysis of the interactional patterns of each dyad provided insights into the nature of the interaction in each setting. The data suggest few differences in interactional patterns between the settings. Instead, there were differences depending on the type of task that the learners carried out.

U2 - 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00318.x

DO - 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00318.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 55

SP - 189

EP - 220

JO - Language Learning

JF - Language Learning

SN - 0023-8333

IS - 4

ER -