Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Teachers’ attitudes to risk-taking in the secon...

Electronic data

  • 2024fosterphd

    Final published version, 1.23 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Teachers’ attitudes to risk-taking in the secondary school classroom

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Published

Standard

Teachers’ attitudes to risk-taking in the secondary school classroom. / Foster, Karen.
Lancaster University, 2024. 177 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Harvard

APA

Foster, K. (2024). Teachers’ attitudes to risk-taking in the secondary school classroom. [Doctoral Thesis, Lancaster University]. Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2501

Vancouver

Foster K. Teachers’ attitudes to risk-taking in the secondary school classroom. Lancaster University, 2024. 177 p. doi: 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2501

Author

Foster, Karen. / Teachers’ attitudes to risk-taking in the secondary school classroom. Lancaster University, 2024. 177 p.

Bibtex

@phdthesis{297845c664c843cda15d9474e98861ac,
title = "Teachers{\textquoteright} attitudes to risk-taking in the secondary school classroom",
abstract = "Taking risks in the classroom is essential for enhancing the capacity of teachers and improving outcomes for pupils (Fullan, 2009). This study investigates teachers{\textquoteright} attitudes to taking voluntary risks to develop their own teaching practice to find out which teaching approaches are considered more risky; whether attitudes change as teachers progress through their careers; and to identify the barriers to risk-taking in the classroom. The research took place in the Southwest of England during the Covid-19 pandemic. A qualitative methodology was employed consisting of semi-structured interviews with 10 teachers from two contrasting, non-selective, stand-alone secondary schools, and supported by data generated through an online survey. My findings show these teachers have positive attitudes to risk-taking, enjoying opportunities to be creative, and expressing a preference for constructivist teaching approaches. These positive attitudes persisted throughout their careers driven by a need to provide the best for their pupils. While attitudes remain positive, barriers to risk-taking change during a teacher{\textquoteright}s career as knowledge, experience, confidence, and responsibilities change. An optimum point exists between 6- and 12-years{\textquoteright} experience where teachers have both the confidence and capacity to take risks. The barriers to risk-taking fall into three categories: practical considerations, teacher time, and curriculum time. The first two are largely a function of the lack of funding and resources available to schools. Teachers respond to these with pragmatism distributing their risk-taking to compensate. This thesis highlights how a lack of curriculum time linked to examination teaching, preparation, and government control, is the greatest barrier, leading to a narrowing of teaching methods and reduction in risk-taking. The resulting lack of teacher agency makes this the hardest barrier to overcome.",
keywords = "Risk, Teachers, Schools, Education, Professional Development, Voluntary risks, Constructivist, Barriers to risk-taking, Career stages, Loss, Significance of loss, Classroom practice, Attitudes to risk, Examination culture, Critical Pedagogy, Curriculum, Time pressures",
author = "Karen Foster",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2501",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",
school = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Teachers’ attitudes to risk-taking in the secondary school classroom

AU - Foster, Karen

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Taking risks in the classroom is essential for enhancing the capacity of teachers and improving outcomes for pupils (Fullan, 2009). This study investigates teachers’ attitudes to taking voluntary risks to develop their own teaching practice to find out which teaching approaches are considered more risky; whether attitudes change as teachers progress through their careers; and to identify the barriers to risk-taking in the classroom. The research took place in the Southwest of England during the Covid-19 pandemic. A qualitative methodology was employed consisting of semi-structured interviews with 10 teachers from two contrasting, non-selective, stand-alone secondary schools, and supported by data generated through an online survey. My findings show these teachers have positive attitudes to risk-taking, enjoying opportunities to be creative, and expressing a preference for constructivist teaching approaches. These positive attitudes persisted throughout their careers driven by a need to provide the best for their pupils. While attitudes remain positive, barriers to risk-taking change during a teacher’s career as knowledge, experience, confidence, and responsibilities change. An optimum point exists between 6- and 12-years’ experience where teachers have both the confidence and capacity to take risks. The barriers to risk-taking fall into three categories: practical considerations, teacher time, and curriculum time. The first two are largely a function of the lack of funding and resources available to schools. Teachers respond to these with pragmatism distributing their risk-taking to compensate. This thesis highlights how a lack of curriculum time linked to examination teaching, preparation, and government control, is the greatest barrier, leading to a narrowing of teaching methods and reduction in risk-taking. The resulting lack of teacher agency makes this the hardest barrier to overcome.

AB - Taking risks in the classroom is essential for enhancing the capacity of teachers and improving outcomes for pupils (Fullan, 2009). This study investigates teachers’ attitudes to taking voluntary risks to develop their own teaching practice to find out which teaching approaches are considered more risky; whether attitudes change as teachers progress through their careers; and to identify the barriers to risk-taking in the classroom. The research took place in the Southwest of England during the Covid-19 pandemic. A qualitative methodology was employed consisting of semi-structured interviews with 10 teachers from two contrasting, non-selective, stand-alone secondary schools, and supported by data generated through an online survey. My findings show these teachers have positive attitudes to risk-taking, enjoying opportunities to be creative, and expressing a preference for constructivist teaching approaches. These positive attitudes persisted throughout their careers driven by a need to provide the best for their pupils. While attitudes remain positive, barriers to risk-taking change during a teacher’s career as knowledge, experience, confidence, and responsibilities change. An optimum point exists between 6- and 12-years’ experience where teachers have both the confidence and capacity to take risks. The barriers to risk-taking fall into three categories: practical considerations, teacher time, and curriculum time. The first two are largely a function of the lack of funding and resources available to schools. Teachers respond to these with pragmatism distributing their risk-taking to compensate. This thesis highlights how a lack of curriculum time linked to examination teaching, preparation, and government control, is the greatest barrier, leading to a narrowing of teaching methods and reduction in risk-taking. The resulting lack of teacher agency makes this the hardest barrier to overcome.

KW - Risk

KW - Teachers

KW - Schools

KW - Education

KW - Professional Development

KW - Voluntary risks

KW - Constructivist

KW - Barriers to risk-taking

KW - Career stages

KW - Loss

KW - Significance of loss

KW - Classroom practice

KW - Attitudes to risk

KW - Examination culture

KW - Critical Pedagogy

KW - Curriculum

KW - Time pressures

U2 - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2501

DO - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2501

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - Lancaster University

ER -