Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Tell me something I don’t know

Links

View graph of relations

Tell me something I don’t know: Speaker salience and style affect comprehenders’ expectations for informativity

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Published

Standard

Tell me something I don’t know: Speaker salience and style affect comprehenders’ expectations for informativity. / Reksnes, Vilde R. S.; Rees, Alice; Cummins, Chris et al.
Information structure and information theory. ed. / Philippa Cook; Anke Holler; Catherine Fabricus-Hansen. Language Science Press, 2024. (Topics at the Grammar-Discourse Interface; Vol. 10).

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Harvard

Reksnes, VRS, Rees, A, Cummins, C & Rohde, H 2024, Tell me something I don’t know: Speaker salience and style affect comprehenders’ expectations for informativity. in P Cook, A Holler & C Fabricus-Hansen (eds), Information structure and information theory. Topics at the Grammar-Discourse Interface, vol. 10, Language Science Press. <http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~hrohde/papers/ReksnesReesCumminsRohde.2024.pdf>

APA

Reksnes, V. R. S., Rees, A., Cummins, C., & Rohde, H. (2024). Tell me something I don’t know: Speaker salience and style affect comprehenders’ expectations for informativity. In P. Cook, A. Holler, & C. Fabricus-Hansen (Eds.), Information structure and information theory (Topics at the Grammar-Discourse Interface; Vol. 10). Language Science Press. http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~hrohde/papers/ReksnesReesCumminsRohde.2024.pdf

Vancouver

Reksnes VRS, Rees A, Cummins C, Rohde H. Tell me something I don’t know: Speaker salience and style affect comprehenders’ expectations for informativity. In Cook P, Holler A, Fabricus-Hansen C, editors, Information structure and information theory. Language Science Press. 2024. (Topics at the Grammar-Discourse Interface).

Author

Reksnes, Vilde R. S. ; Rees, Alice ; Cummins, Chris et al. / Tell me something I don’t know : Speaker salience and style affect comprehenders’ expectations for informativity. Information structure and information theory. editor / Philippa Cook ; Anke Holler ; Catherine Fabricus-Hansen. Language Science Press, 2024. (Topics at the Grammar-Discourse Interface).

Bibtex

@inbook{54418c99f0254e6eb52a8864a4c49592,
title = "Tell me something I don{\textquoteright}t know: Speaker salience and style affect comprehenders{\textquoteright} expectations for informativity",
abstract = "A comprehender{\textquoteright}s estimate of what events or situations are typical in the world is distinct from their estimate of what a speaker is likely to report on. Comprehension and production studies have shown contradicting preferences for which types of estimates are used by comprehenders and by speakers: typicality is favoured in comprehension (e.g. real-world typical content is associated with processing ease), whereas speakers{\textquoteright} production choices favour the inclusion of surprising or informative content (i.e., easily inferable or typical content is disfavoured). We posit that comprehenders are aware of and make use of speakers{\textquoteright} production preferences when anticipating upcoming content. In two studies, we elicit sentence completions as an index of comprehenders{\textquoteright} expectations about upcoming material and evaluate the informativity of these completions (their object typicality, presence of modification or negation, and information theoretic entropy and relative entropy scores). Experiment 1 manipulated the salience of the speaker and found that increased emphasis on the speaker led to an increase in informativity, showing that the more aware comprehenders are made of an intentionally communicating speaker, the more their expectations favour upcoming words that would yield an informative utterance. Experiment 2 further tested the malleability of this informativity bias by familiarising participants with two speakers who differ in the informativity of their utterances. When completing utterances from the two speakers, comprehenders provide more informative completions for the high-informativityspeaker, showing that comprehenders are able to adapt their expectations for informativity to individual speakers{\textquoteright} communicative styles. This sensitivity to speakers{\textquoteright} production preferences highlights a role for informativity-driven reasoning about the speaker in models of language processing.",
author = "Reksnes, {Vilde R. S.} and Alice Rees and Chris Cummins and Hannah Rohde",
year = "2024",
month = sep,
day = "19",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783985541102",
series = "Topics at the Grammar-Discourse Interface",
publisher = "Language Science Press",
editor = "Philippa Cook and Anke Holler and Catherine Fabricus-Hansen",
booktitle = "Information structure and information theory",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Tell me something I don’t know

T2 - Speaker salience and style affect comprehenders’ expectations for informativity

AU - Reksnes, Vilde R. S.

AU - Rees, Alice

AU - Cummins, Chris

AU - Rohde, Hannah

PY - 2024/9/19

Y1 - 2024/9/19

N2 - A comprehender’s estimate of what events or situations are typical in the world is distinct from their estimate of what a speaker is likely to report on. Comprehension and production studies have shown contradicting preferences for which types of estimates are used by comprehenders and by speakers: typicality is favoured in comprehension (e.g. real-world typical content is associated with processing ease), whereas speakers’ production choices favour the inclusion of surprising or informative content (i.e., easily inferable or typical content is disfavoured). We posit that comprehenders are aware of and make use of speakers’ production preferences when anticipating upcoming content. In two studies, we elicit sentence completions as an index of comprehenders’ expectations about upcoming material and evaluate the informativity of these completions (their object typicality, presence of modification or negation, and information theoretic entropy and relative entropy scores). Experiment 1 manipulated the salience of the speaker and found that increased emphasis on the speaker led to an increase in informativity, showing that the more aware comprehenders are made of an intentionally communicating speaker, the more their expectations favour upcoming words that would yield an informative utterance. Experiment 2 further tested the malleability of this informativity bias by familiarising participants with two speakers who differ in the informativity of their utterances. When completing utterances from the two speakers, comprehenders provide more informative completions for the high-informativityspeaker, showing that comprehenders are able to adapt their expectations for informativity to individual speakers’ communicative styles. This sensitivity to speakers’ production preferences highlights a role for informativity-driven reasoning about the speaker in models of language processing.

AB - A comprehender’s estimate of what events or situations are typical in the world is distinct from their estimate of what a speaker is likely to report on. Comprehension and production studies have shown contradicting preferences for which types of estimates are used by comprehenders and by speakers: typicality is favoured in comprehension (e.g. real-world typical content is associated with processing ease), whereas speakers’ production choices favour the inclusion of surprising or informative content (i.e., easily inferable or typical content is disfavoured). We posit that comprehenders are aware of and make use of speakers’ production preferences when anticipating upcoming content. In two studies, we elicit sentence completions as an index of comprehenders’ expectations about upcoming material and evaluate the informativity of these completions (their object typicality, presence of modification or negation, and information theoretic entropy and relative entropy scores). Experiment 1 manipulated the salience of the speaker and found that increased emphasis on the speaker led to an increase in informativity, showing that the more aware comprehenders are made of an intentionally communicating speaker, the more their expectations favour upcoming words that would yield an informative utterance. Experiment 2 further tested the malleability of this informativity bias by familiarising participants with two speakers who differ in the informativity of their utterances. When completing utterances from the two speakers, comprehenders provide more informative completions for the high-informativityspeaker, showing that comprehenders are able to adapt their expectations for informativity to individual speakers’ communicative styles. This sensitivity to speakers’ production preferences highlights a role for informativity-driven reasoning about the speaker in models of language processing.

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9783985541102

T3 - Topics at the Grammar-Discourse Interface

BT - Information structure and information theory

A2 - Cook, Philippa

A2 - Holler, Anke

A2 - Fabricus-Hansen, Catherine

PB - Language Science Press

ER -