Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Templates of expected measurement uncertainties

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Templates of expected measurement uncertainties

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • D. Neudecker
  • A.M. Lewis
  • E.F. Matthews
  • J. Vanhoy
  • R.C. Haight
  • D.L. Smith
  • P. Talou
  • A.D. Carlson
  • B. Pierson
  • A. Wallner
  • A. Al-Adili
  • L. Bernstein
  • R. Capote
  • M. Devlin
  • M. Drosg
  • D.L. Duke
  • S. Finch
  • M.W. Herman
  • K.J. Kelly
  • A. Koning
  • A.E. Lovell
  • P. Marini
  • K. Montoya
  • G.P.A. Nobre
  • M. Paris
  • B. Pritychenko
  • H. Sjöstrand
  • L. Snyder
  • V. Sobes
  • A. Solders
  • J. Taieb
Close
Article number35
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>10/11/2023
<mark>Journal</mark>EPJ Nuclear Sciences and Technologies
Volume9
Number of pages10
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

The covariance committee of CSEWG (Cross Section Evaluation Working Group) established templates of expected measurement uncertainties for neutron-induced total, (n,γ), neutron-induced charged-particle, and (n,xn) reaction cross sections as well as prompt fission neutron spectra, average prompt and total fission neutron multiplicities, and fission yields. Templates provide a list of what uncertainty sources are expected for each measurement type and observable, and suggest typical ranges of these uncertainties and correlations based on a survey of experimental data, associated literature, and feedback from experimenters. Information needed to faithfully include the experimental data in the nuclear-data evaluation process is also provided. These templates could assist (a) experimenters and EXFOR compilers in delivering more complete uncertainties and measurement information relevant for evaluations of new experimental data, and (b) evaluators in achieving a more comprehensive uncertainty quantification for evaluation purposes. This effort might ultimately lead to more realistic evaluated covariances for nuclear-data applications. In this topical issue, we cover the templates coming out of this CSEWG effort–typically, one observable per paper. This paper here prefaces this topical issue by introducing the concept and mathematical framework of templates, discussing potential use cases, and giving an example of how they can be applied (estimating missing experimental uncertainties of 235U(n,f) average prompt fission neutron multiplicities), and their impact on nuclear-data evaluations.