Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Testing active choice for screening practitione...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Testing active choice for screening practitioner's gender in endoscopy among disinclined women: An online experiment

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Testing active choice for screening practitioner's gender in endoscopy among disinclined women: An online experiment. / Stoffel, Sandro T; Hirst, Yasemin; Ghanouni, Alex et al.
In: Journal of medical screening, Vol. 26, No. 2, 30.06.2019, p. 98-103.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Stoffel, ST, Hirst, Y, Ghanouni, A, McGregor, LM, Kerrison, R, Verstraete, W, Gallagher, A, Waller, J & von Wagner, C 2019, 'Testing active choice for screening practitioner's gender in endoscopy among disinclined women: An online experiment', Journal of medical screening, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 98-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969141318806322

APA

Stoffel, S. T., Hirst, Y., Ghanouni, A., McGregor, L. M., Kerrison, R., Verstraete, W., Gallagher, A., Waller, J., & von Wagner, C. (2019). Testing active choice for screening practitioner's gender in endoscopy among disinclined women: An online experiment. Journal of medical screening, 26(2), 98-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969141318806322

Vancouver

Stoffel ST, Hirst Y, Ghanouni A, McGregor LM, Kerrison R, Verstraete W et al. Testing active choice for screening practitioner's gender in endoscopy among disinclined women: An online experiment. Journal of medical screening. 2019 Jun 30;26(2):98-103. Epub 2018 Nov 14. doi: 10.1177/0969141318806322

Author

Stoffel, Sandro T ; Hirst, Yasemin ; Ghanouni, Alex et al. / Testing active choice for screening practitioner's gender in endoscopy among disinclined women : An online experiment. In: Journal of medical screening. 2019 ; Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 98-103.

Bibtex

@article{7b1054a8761e4b43a11323e58d426e3b,
title = "Testing active choice for screening practitioner's gender in endoscopy among disinclined women: An online experiment",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: A large proportion of women have a preference for a same-gender endoscopy practitioner. We tested how information about practitioner gender affected intention to have bowel scope screening in a sample of women disinclined to have the test.METHODS: In an online experimental survey, women aged 35-54 living in England who did not intend to participate in bowel scope screening (N = 1060) were randomised to one of four experimental conditions: (1) control (practitioner's gender is unknown), (2) opposite-gender (male practitioner by default), (3) same gender (female practitioner by default), and (4) active choice (the patient could choose the gender of the practitioner). Intention was measured following the interventions.RESULTS: Of 1010 (95.3%) women who completed the survey, most were White-British (83.6%), and working (63.3%). Compared with control, both active choice and same-gender conditions increased intention among disinclined women (9.3% vs. 16.0% and 17.9%; OR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.07-3.20 and OR: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.23-3.50). There were no differences in intention between the opposite-gender and control conditions (9.8% vs. 9.3%; OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.60-1.90) or the active choice and same-gender conditions (16.0% vs. 17.9%: OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.55-1.46, using same gender as baseline).CONCLUSIONS: Offering disinclined women a same-gender practitioner, either by choice or default, increased subsequent intention, while an opposite gender default did not negatively affect intention. Reducing uncertainty about gender of practitioner could positively affect uptake in women, and should be tested in a randomised controlled trial.",
keywords = "Adult, Endoscopy/methods, England, Female, Humans, Internet, Male, Mass Screening/methods, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Participation, Physician-Patient Relations, Sex Factors, Surveys and Questionnaires",
author = "Stoffel, {Sandro T} and Yasemin Hirst and Alex Ghanouni and McGregor, {Lesley M} and Robert Kerrison and Wouter Verstraete and Ailish Gallagher and Jo Waller and {von Wagner}, Christian",
year = "2019",
month = jun,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1177/0969141318806322",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "98--103",
journal = "Journal of medical screening",
issn = "0969-1413",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing active choice for screening practitioner's gender in endoscopy among disinclined women

T2 - An online experiment

AU - Stoffel, Sandro T

AU - Hirst, Yasemin

AU - Ghanouni, Alex

AU - McGregor, Lesley M

AU - Kerrison, Robert

AU - Verstraete, Wouter

AU - Gallagher, Ailish

AU - Waller, Jo

AU - von Wagner, Christian

PY - 2019/6/30

Y1 - 2019/6/30

N2 - OBJECTIVES: A large proportion of women have a preference for a same-gender endoscopy practitioner. We tested how information about practitioner gender affected intention to have bowel scope screening in a sample of women disinclined to have the test.METHODS: In an online experimental survey, women aged 35-54 living in England who did not intend to participate in bowel scope screening (N = 1060) were randomised to one of four experimental conditions: (1) control (practitioner's gender is unknown), (2) opposite-gender (male practitioner by default), (3) same gender (female practitioner by default), and (4) active choice (the patient could choose the gender of the practitioner). Intention was measured following the interventions.RESULTS: Of 1010 (95.3%) women who completed the survey, most were White-British (83.6%), and working (63.3%). Compared with control, both active choice and same-gender conditions increased intention among disinclined women (9.3% vs. 16.0% and 17.9%; OR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.07-3.20 and OR: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.23-3.50). There were no differences in intention between the opposite-gender and control conditions (9.8% vs. 9.3%; OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.60-1.90) or the active choice and same-gender conditions (16.0% vs. 17.9%: OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.55-1.46, using same gender as baseline).CONCLUSIONS: Offering disinclined women a same-gender practitioner, either by choice or default, increased subsequent intention, while an opposite gender default did not negatively affect intention. Reducing uncertainty about gender of practitioner could positively affect uptake in women, and should be tested in a randomised controlled trial.

AB - OBJECTIVES: A large proportion of women have a preference for a same-gender endoscopy practitioner. We tested how information about practitioner gender affected intention to have bowel scope screening in a sample of women disinclined to have the test.METHODS: In an online experimental survey, women aged 35-54 living in England who did not intend to participate in bowel scope screening (N = 1060) were randomised to one of four experimental conditions: (1) control (practitioner's gender is unknown), (2) opposite-gender (male practitioner by default), (3) same gender (female practitioner by default), and (4) active choice (the patient could choose the gender of the practitioner). Intention was measured following the interventions.RESULTS: Of 1010 (95.3%) women who completed the survey, most were White-British (83.6%), and working (63.3%). Compared with control, both active choice and same-gender conditions increased intention among disinclined women (9.3% vs. 16.0% and 17.9%; OR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.07-3.20 and OR: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.23-3.50). There were no differences in intention between the opposite-gender and control conditions (9.8% vs. 9.3%; OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.60-1.90) or the active choice and same-gender conditions (16.0% vs. 17.9%: OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.55-1.46, using same gender as baseline).CONCLUSIONS: Offering disinclined women a same-gender practitioner, either by choice or default, increased subsequent intention, while an opposite gender default did not negatively affect intention. Reducing uncertainty about gender of practitioner could positively affect uptake in women, and should be tested in a randomised controlled trial.

KW - Adult

KW - Endoscopy/methods

KW - England

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Internet

KW - Male

KW - Mass Screening/methods

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Patient Acceptance of Health Care

KW - Patient Participation

KW - Physician-Patient Relations

KW - Sex Factors

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

U2 - 10.1177/0969141318806322

DO - 10.1177/0969141318806322

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30428750

VL - 26

SP - 98

EP - 103

JO - Journal of medical screening

JF - Journal of medical screening

SN - 0969-1413

IS - 2

ER -