Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Testing Potential Transfer Effects in Heritage ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Testing Potential Transfer Effects in Heritage and Adult L2 Bilinguals Acquiring a Mini Grammar as an Additional Language: An ERP Approach

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Testing Potential Transfer Effects in Heritage and Adult L2 Bilinguals Acquiring a Mini Grammar as an Additional Language: An ERP Approach. / Soares, Sergio Miguel Pereira; Kupisch, Tanja; Rothman, Jason.
In: Brain Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 5, 669, 20.05.2022.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{52b9819b18884c9d9a883f694ab4c0de,
title = "Testing Potential Transfer Effects in Heritage and Adult L2 Bilinguals Acquiring a Mini Grammar as an Additional Language: An ERP Approach",
abstract = "Models on L3/Ln acquisition differ with respect to how they envisage degree (holistic vs. selective transfer of the L1, L2 or both) and/or timing (initial stages vs. development) of how the influence of source languages unfolds. This study uses EEG/ERPs to examine these models, bringing together two types of bilinguals: heritage speakers (HSs) (Italian‐German, n = 15) compared to adult L2 learners (L1 German, L2 English, n = 28) learning L3/Ln Latin. Participants were trained on a selected Latin lexicon over two sessions and, afterward, on two grammatical properties: case (similar between German and Latin) and adjective–noun order (similar between Italian and Latin). Neurophysiological findings show an N200/N400 deflection for the HSs in case morphology and a P600 effect for the German L2 group in adjectival position. None of the current L3/Ln models predict the observed results, which questions the appropriateness of this methodology. Nevertheless, the results are illustrative of differences in how HSs and L2 learners approach the very initial stages of additional language learning, the implications of which are discussed.",
keywords = "adjective position, EEG/ERPs, L3/Ln acquisition, Mini‐Latin, morphological case",
author = "Soares, {Sergio Miguel Pereira} and Tanja Kupisch and Jason Rothman",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.",
year = "2022",
month = may,
day = "20",
doi = "10.3390/brainsci12050669",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Brain Sciences",
issn = "2076-3425",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing Potential Transfer Effects in Heritage and Adult L2 Bilinguals Acquiring a Mini Grammar as an Additional Language

T2 - An ERP Approach

AU - Soares, Sergio Miguel Pereira

AU - Kupisch, Tanja

AU - Rothman, Jason

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

PY - 2022/5/20

Y1 - 2022/5/20

N2 - Models on L3/Ln acquisition differ with respect to how they envisage degree (holistic vs. selective transfer of the L1, L2 or both) and/or timing (initial stages vs. development) of how the influence of source languages unfolds. This study uses EEG/ERPs to examine these models, bringing together two types of bilinguals: heritage speakers (HSs) (Italian‐German, n = 15) compared to adult L2 learners (L1 German, L2 English, n = 28) learning L3/Ln Latin. Participants were trained on a selected Latin lexicon over two sessions and, afterward, on two grammatical properties: case (similar between German and Latin) and adjective–noun order (similar between Italian and Latin). Neurophysiological findings show an N200/N400 deflection for the HSs in case morphology and a P600 effect for the German L2 group in adjectival position. None of the current L3/Ln models predict the observed results, which questions the appropriateness of this methodology. Nevertheless, the results are illustrative of differences in how HSs and L2 learners approach the very initial stages of additional language learning, the implications of which are discussed.

AB - Models on L3/Ln acquisition differ with respect to how they envisage degree (holistic vs. selective transfer of the L1, L2 or both) and/or timing (initial stages vs. development) of how the influence of source languages unfolds. This study uses EEG/ERPs to examine these models, bringing together two types of bilinguals: heritage speakers (HSs) (Italian‐German, n = 15) compared to adult L2 learners (L1 German, L2 English, n = 28) learning L3/Ln Latin. Participants were trained on a selected Latin lexicon over two sessions and, afterward, on two grammatical properties: case (similar between German and Latin) and adjective–noun order (similar between Italian and Latin). Neurophysiological findings show an N200/N400 deflection for the HSs in case morphology and a P600 effect for the German L2 group in adjectival position. None of the current L3/Ln models predict the observed results, which questions the appropriateness of this methodology. Nevertheless, the results are illustrative of differences in how HSs and L2 learners approach the very initial stages of additional language learning, the implications of which are discussed.

KW - adjective position

KW - EEG/ERPs

KW - L3/Ln acquisition

KW - Mini‐Latin

KW - morphological case

U2 - 10.3390/brainsci12050669

DO - 10.3390/brainsci12050669

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35625058

AN - SCOPUS:85131045033

VL - 12

JO - Brain Sciences

JF - Brain Sciences

SN - 2076-3425

IS - 5

M1 - 669

ER -